Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Landscape and Urban Planning

Should I stay or should I go: How urban heat gradients affect the local distribution of birds and bats

3 more authors

Abstract

Facing escalating biodiversity decline, threats extend beyond species loss to reduced evolutionary and functional potential in ecosystems. Urbanisation is one of the main causes of biodiversity loss, and its impact is expected to be further increased by the anticipated growth in the human population over the coming decades. In this context, achieving sustainable development requires a balance between conservation and urban growth. A key step in characterizing the impacts of urbanisation on biodiversity using integrative approaches that reflect current scenarios of global change. This study focuses on the main representatives of urban flying vertebrates, birds and bats, to study how different levels of urbanisation affect these components of biodiversity. More precisely, we examine the influence of Urban Heat Islands (UHIs), as a proxy of strong urbanisation, on community composition and taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of bats and birds in the French city of Poitiers. We also assess the contribution of turnover and nestedness to community composition. Our results indicate that high urbanisation, reflected by UHIs, affects community composition, particularly for bats, whose diversity across taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional components is reduced. In contrast, birds display only a decline in taxonomic diversity in these zones. Turnover is the dominant process structuring bird communities, whereas nestedness primarily drives bat assemblages, suggesting greater potential for species replacement in birds. These results highlight the differing vulnerability of birds and bats to urbanisation and emphasize the need to consider these differences and the ecological interactions between them in conservation and urban planning strategies.

Related

  1. Land-use legacies and drought exposure affect aboveground carbon dynamics along elevational gradients in tropical forests of China
    Ruiming Cheng, Huiwen Wang, Chen Chen +7
    Forest Ecology and ManagementPeer-reviewedLicence not statedEcologyHAL
  2. Planting set-up and local environmental conditions affect outcomes in tropical agricultural restoration
    S. Shin-Clayton, A. A. K. Aryawan, D. Buchori +7
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEcologybioRxiv
  3. Spatio-temporal patterns of diversity and distribution of common Megachile bees across agroclimatic gradients in Eastern India
    Kaushik Pramanik, Ipsita Ghosh, Debashis Mandal +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCrossref
  4. Crown-based growth strategies explain the distribution and co-occurrence of tree functional groups along environmental gradients
    K. K. Htoo, M. Onishi, M. F. Rahman +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEcologybioRxiv
  5. Distribution Patterns and Community Assembly of Soil Nematodes Along Elevation Gradients in a Dry‐Hot Valley
    Jinxiu Zhang, Haoran Lei, Na Lin +4
    Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{querejeta2026should,
  title = {{Should I stay or should I go: How urban heat gradients affect the local distribution of birds and bats}},
  author = {Marina Querejeta and Axel Jame and Élie Morin and Simon Chapenoire and Alice Chéron and Hélène Paulhac and Mohamed Said Ramdani and Yvonnick Guinard and Thibaut Preux and Romain Michenaud and Jean-Louis Yengué and Dominique Royoux and Thomas Rodier and Nicolas Bech and Sophie Beltran-Bech},
  journal = {Landscape and Urban Planning},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.landurbplan.2026.105735},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05729857v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Should I stay or should I go: How urban heat gradients affect the local distribution of birds and bats
AU  - Marina Querejeta
AU  - Axel Jame
AU  - Élie Morin
AU  - Simon Chapenoire
AU  - Alice Chéron
AU  - Hélène Paulhac
AU  - Mohamed Said Ramdani
AU  - Yvonnick Guinard
AU  - Thibaut Preux
AU  - Romain Michenaud
AU  - Jean-Louis Yengué
AU  - Dominique Royoux
AU  - Thomas Rodier
AU  - Nicolas Bech
AU  - Sophie Beltran-Bech
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Landscape and Urban Planning
DO  - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2026.105735
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05729857v1
AB  - Facing escalating biodiversity decline, threats extend beyond species loss to reduced evolutionary and functional potential in ecosystems. Urbanisation is one of the main causes of biodiversity loss, and its impact is expected to be further increased by the anticipated growth in the human population over the coming decades. In this context, achieving sustainable development requires a balance between conservation and urban growth. A key step in characterizing the impacts of urbanisation on biodiversity using integrative approaches that reflect current scenarios of global change. This study focuses on the main representatives of urban flying vertebrates, birds and bats, to study how different levels of urbanisation affect these components of biodiversity. More precisely, we examine the influence of Urban Heat Islands (UHIs), as a proxy of strong urbanisation, on community composition and taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of bats and birds in the French city of Poitiers. We also assess the contribution of turnover and nestedness to community composition. Our results indicate that high urbanisation, reflected by UHIs, affects community composition, particularly for bats, whose diversity across taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional components is reduced. In contrast, birds display only a decline in taxonomic diversity in these zones. Turnover is the dominant process structuring bird communities, whereas nestedness primarily drives bat assemblages, suggesting greater potential for species replacement in birds. These results highlight the differing vulnerability of birds and bats to urbanisation and emphasize the need to consider these differences and the ecological interactions between them in conservation and urban planning strategies.
SN  - 0169-2046
ER  -