Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAnnals of Intensive Care

The effect of time-varying left ventricular ejection fraction on clinical outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients

1 more authors

Abstract

Background

Although right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and acute cor pulmonale are associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19, the prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction remains insufficiently characterized. In particular, dynamic changes in cardiac function during intensive care has seldom been studied. We therefore investigated the association between time-varying LV systolic function, assessed by LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in patients with COVID-19, taking into account right ventricular function and forward flow.Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study combined three ICU data repositories comprising 808 patients with 1614 echocardiographic examinations. Time-varying LV systolic function (LVEF ≤ 50%, 51-70%, >70%) was the primary exposure, and ICU mortality was the outcome. Multivariable Cox models with time-varying covariates, including, acute cor pulmonale, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and key clinical characteristics were used to assess associations between LV systolic function phenotypes and outcome.Results

At baseline, 27% of patients had abnormal LV systolic function (LVEF ≤ 50%) and 17% had hyperdynamic LV function (LVEF > 70%). The proportion of patients with normal LV systolic function increased over time. Abnormal LV systolic function was most prevalent at the first echocardiographic examination (27%) and least prevalent at the fifth examination (17%), whereas hyperdynamic LV function became more frequent during ICU stay, peaking at the 4th echocardiographic examination. Abnormal (aHR; 1.174, 95% CI: 0.901-1.531) or hyperdynamic (aHR: 1.041, 95% CI: 0.785-1.379) LV systolic dysfunction was not independently associated with ICU mortality.Conclusion

In critically ill patients with COVID-19, LV systolic dysfunction, including both abnormal and hyperdynamic LV phenotypes, were common and dynamic during ICU stay. LV systolic dysfunction was not independently associated with ICU mortality when modelled longitudinally and adjusted for RV dysfunction, forward flow and other clinical covariates. These findings suggest that the prognostic value LVEF phenotypes in severe COVID-19 may be limited. Further studies incorporating more sensitive measures of LV function and biomarkers of myocardial injury may be required to delineate subtle changes not captured by LVEF.

Related

  1. Single-nucleus multi-omics reveals reversible molecular signatures in skeletal muscle of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    M. L. Bose, A. Varshney, N. J. Carruthers +14
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  2. Potential roles for transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
    Zhicheng Gao, Jiaqi Bao, Chaojie He +3
    Channels (Austin, Tex.)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  3. BAG3 genetic variant is associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes
    Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu, Hendri Susilo, Jesselyn Wijaya +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biochemistryCell biologyPLOSPMC
  4. Patiromer Efficacy across Kidney Function and Hyperkalemia Subgroups in Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Andreas P Kalogeropoulos, Ahmed Mustafa Rashid, Stefan D Anker +22
    Kidney360Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyHAL
  5. The clinical picture of ICANS after CAR-T cell therapy in critically ill patients: A retrospective clustering analysis of a multicentre multinational cohort study
    Ana Vagos-Mata, Pedro Castro, Sandrine Valade +25
    Annals of Intensive CarePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
BibTeX
@article{chew2026effect,
  title = {{The effect of time-varying left ventricular ejection fraction on clinical outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients}},
  author = {M.S. Chew and S. Jansson and M. Jozwiak and Z. Hassanzadeh and H. Didriksson and C. Jonsson and H. Andersson and M. Åström Aneq and M. Slama and A. Vieillard Baron and P. Vignon and H. Zhang and S. Huang},
  journal = {Annals of Intensive Care},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100171},
  url = {https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-05836675v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The effect of time-varying left ventricular ejection fraction on clinical outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients
AU  - M.S. Chew
AU  - S. Jansson
AU  - M. Jozwiak
AU  - Z. Hassanzadeh
AU  - H. Didriksson
AU  - C. Jonsson
AU  - H. Andersson
AU  - M. Åström Aneq
AU  - M. Slama
AU  - A. Vieillard Baron
AU  - P. Vignon
AU  - H. Zhang
AU  - S. Huang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
JO  - Annals of Intensive Care
DO  - 10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100171
UR  - https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-05836675v1
AB  - Background  Although right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and acute cor pulmonale are associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19, the prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction remains insufficiently characterized. In particular, dynamic changes in cardiac function during intensive care has seldom been studied. We therefore investigated the association between time-varying LV systolic function, assessed by LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in patients with COVID-19, taking into account right ventricular function and forward flow.Methods  This retrospective observational cohort study combined three ICU data repositories comprising 808 patients with 1614 echocardiographic examinations. Time-varying LV systolic function (LVEF ≤ 50%, 51-70%, >70%) was the primary exposure, and ICU mortality was the outcome. Multivariable Cox models with time-varying covariates, including, acute cor pulmonale, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and key clinical characteristics were used to assess associations between LV systolic function phenotypes and outcome.Results  At baseline, 27% of patients had abnormal LV systolic function (LVEF ≤ 50%) and 17% had hyperdynamic LV function (LVEF > 70%). The proportion of patients with normal LV systolic function increased over time. Abnormal LV systolic function was most prevalent at the first echocardiographic examination (27%) and least prevalent at the fifth examination (17%), whereas hyperdynamic LV function became more frequent during ICU stay, peaking at the 4th echocardiographic examination. Abnormal (aHR; 1.174, 95% CI: 0.901-1.531) or hyperdynamic (aHR: 1.041, 95% CI: 0.785-1.379) LV systolic dysfunction was not independently associated with ICU mortality.Conclusion  In critically ill patients with COVID-19, LV systolic dysfunction, including both abnormal and hyperdynamic LV phenotypes, were common and dynamic during ICU stay. LV systolic dysfunction was not independently associated with ICU mortality when modelled longitudinally and adjusted for RV dysfunction, forward flow and other clinical covariates. These findings suggest that the prognostic value LVEF phenotypes in severe COVID-19 may be limited. Further studies incorporating more sensitive measures of LV function and biomarkers of myocardial injury may be required to delineate subtle changes not captured by LVEF.
SN  - 2110-5820
ER  -