Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Flow Matching for Fast Posterior Sampling in Bayesian Inverse Problems

Abstract

Sampling from the posterior is the central task of computational Bayesian inverse problems. The standard workhorse in Bayesian inference---Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)---is sequential, yields correlated samples, and must be rerun for each new observation. Conditional flow matching offers an amortized alternative: a transport map, trained once on joint samples of parameter and data, that yields independent approximate posterior samples for any observation at negligible online cost, without new likelihood evaluations. We give a careful, MCMC-literate assessment of flow matching for PDE-based inverse problems with function-valued parameters. Exploiting the flow's tractable density, we derive computable accuracy estimates for the learned posterior in total variation distance and Kullback--Leibler divergence and, moreover, propose a hybrid sampler that is made asymptotically exact by Metropolization. We validate the accuracy estimates and demonstrate amortization in several numerical examples, including electrical impedance tomography and a likelihood-free Lotka--Volterra model. Flow matching reproduces posterior means and credible bands closely at a fraction of the forward solves required by MCMC, but its accuracy degrades for concentrated posteriors and for observations that are atypical under the prior.

Related

  1. Accelerating posterior sampling in Bayesian inverse problems with diffusion models: an online-offline perspective
    Duc-Lam Duong
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingStatisticsarXiv
  2. Posterior Convergence without Force Convergence: Resolution-Stable Sampling for Rough Bayesian Inverse Problems
    Zhiliang Deng, Xiaomei Yang
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingStatisticsarXiv
  3. Flow Annealing Posterior Sampling for Function-Space Regression and Inverse Problems
    Yaozhong Shi, Zachary E. Ross, Yisong Yue
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Kinetic Langevin Meets Split Gibbs: Accelerated Posterior Sampling for Imaging Inverse Problems with Diffusion Priors
    Dai Hai Nguyen, Duc Dung Nguyen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. On Prior-to-Posterior Stability in the Wasserstein Metric for Bayesian Inverse Problems
    Lianghao Cao
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{blechschmidt2026flow,
  title = {{Flow Matching for Fast Posterior Sampling in Bayesian Inverse Problems}},
  author = {Jan Blechschmidt and Oliver G. Ernst and Moritz Poguntke and Björn Sprungk},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.02377},
  eprint = {2610.02377},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02377},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Flow Matching for Fast Posterior Sampling in Bayesian Inverse Problems
AU  - Jan Blechschmidt
AU  - Oliver G. Ernst
AU  - Moritz Poguntke
AU  - Björn Sprungk
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.02377
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02377
AB  - Sampling from the posterior is the central task of computational Bayesian inverse problems. The standard workhorse in Bayesian inference---Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)---is sequential, yields correlated samples, and must be rerun for each new observation. Conditional flow matching offers an amortized alternative: a transport map, trained once on joint samples of parameter and data, that yields independent approximate posterior samples for any observation at negligible online cost, without new likelihood evaluations. We give a careful, MCMC-literate assessment of flow matching for PDE-based inverse problems with function-valued parameters. Exploiting the flow's tractable density, we derive computable accuracy estimates for the learned posterior in total variation distance and Kullback--Leibler divergence and, moreover, propose a hybrid sampler that is made asymptotically exact by Metropolization. We validate the accuracy estimates and demonstrate amortization in several numerical examples, including electrical impedance tomography and a likelihood-free Lotka--Volterra model. Flow matching reproduces posterior means and credible bands closely at a fraction of the forward solves required by MCMC, but its accuracy degrades for concentrated posteriors and for observations that are atypical under the prior.
ER  -