Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in trauma-affected refugees with PTSD

Abstract

Background: Trauma-affected refugees often experience impaired functioning due to psychiatric symptoms and post-migration stressors. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) is increasingly used in refugee mental health research, but its measurement properties in clinical refugee populations have not been sufficiently examined. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the clinician-rated 12-item WHODAS in trauma-affected refugees with PTSD.

Methods: Baseline data were combined from two randomized controlled trials (N = 214) conducted at a specialized outpatient clinic for trauma-affected refugees in Denmark. Participants were adult refugees diagnosed with PTSD. Rasch analysis examined model fit, dimensionality, reliability, and differential item functioning across key subgroups.

Results: The baseline model showed acceptable global fit (p = .060), but evidence of multidimensionality, item misfit, and differential item functioning. Items related to mobility and self-care formed a distinct somatic subdimension separate from the remaining psychosocial items. A modified seven-item psychosocial subscale showed acceptable fit after accounting for local dependence and differential item functioning by sex and education. These findings indicate that different aspects of functioning are captured across items rather than a single construct. Men reported greater concentration difficulties, and respondents with lower education reported greater difficulties learning new tasks at the same trait level.

Conclusions: The 12-item WHODAS captures important aspects of functioning in trauma-affected refugees with PTSD, but it may not function as a strictly unidimensional measure. Total scores should therefore be interpreted with caution. Item-level responses may provide clinically useful information about functional profiles and barriers to recovery, particularly when functioning is shaped by both psychiatric symptoms and post-migration stressors.

Key messages: • WHODAS-12 captures functioning in trauma-affected refugees but is not strictly unidimensional; total scores should be interpreted with caution.

• Item-level responses can identify functional profiles and barriers to recovery, supporting more targeted and patient-centred interventions.

Related

  1. Psychometric Properties of the Swedish version of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) in a mixed trauma sample – a comprehensive evaluation
    Kristina Bondjers, Albin Granlöf, Josefin Sveen +1
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  2. The impact of racist events on post-trauma mental health symptoms among immigrants and refugees in Canada: the role of racial trauma.
    Ling Jin, Tina Nguyen
    European journal of psychotraumatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  3. Clinical and resting-state EEG changes following neurofeedback in adult refugees with persistent trauma-related symptoms: a transdiagnostic pre-post observational study.
    Mirjana Askovic, Matteo Mascelloni, Sejla Murdoch +3
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Psychometric properties of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF) in adolescents from the Peruvian Amazon.
    Marita Mily Paz-Vilchez, Yosmeli Moreno-Acosta, Julio Cjuno +1
    Frontiers in psychologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  5. German Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Conversation Questionnaire
    Peter Bang, Lilly Fimpel, Joel Baisch +3
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
BibTeX
@article{vindbjerg2026psychometric,
  title = {{Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in trauma-affected refugees with PTSD}},
  author = {E Vindbjerg and H A Laugesen and J Carlsson and M Bruhn and H Sandahl},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1022},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1022},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in trauma-affected refugees with PTSD
AU  - E Vindbjerg
AU  - H A Laugesen
AU  - J Carlsson
AU  - M Bruhn
AU  - H Sandahl
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1022
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1022
AB  - Background: Trauma-affected refugees often experience impaired functioning due to psychiatric symptoms and post-migration stressors. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) is increasingly used in refugee mental health research, but its measurement properties in clinical refugee populations have not been sufficiently examined. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the clinician-rated 12-item WHODAS in trauma-affected refugees with PTSD.  Methods: Baseline data were combined from two randomized controlled trials (N = 214) conducted at a specialized outpatient clinic for trauma-affected refugees in Denmark. Participants were adult refugees diagnosed with PTSD. Rasch analysis examined model fit, dimensionality, reliability, and differential item functioning across key subgroups.  Results: The baseline model showed acceptable global fit (p = .060), but evidence of multidimensionality, item misfit, and differential item functioning. Items related to mobility and self-care formed a distinct somatic subdimension separate from the remaining psychosocial items. A modified seven-item psychosocial subscale showed acceptable fit after accounting for local dependence and differential item functioning by sex and education. These findings indicate that different aspects of functioning are captured across items rather than a single construct. Men reported greater concentration difficulties, and respondents with lower education reported greater difficulties learning new tasks at the same trait level.  Conclusions: The 12-item WHODAS captures important aspects of functioning in trauma-affected refugees with PTSD, but it may not function as a strictly unidimensional measure. Total scores should therefore be interpreted with caution. Item-level responses may provide clinically useful information about functional profiles and barriers to recovery, particularly when functioning is shaped by both psychiatric symptoms and post-migration stressors.  Key messages: • WHODAS-12 captures functioning in trauma-affected refugees but is not strictly unidimensional; total scores should be interpreted with caution.  • Item-level responses can identify functional profiles and barriers to recovery, supporting more targeted and patient-centred interventions.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -