Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in Insect Science

Norroa™ as a dsRNA biopesticide for Varroa destructor: insights from New Zealand research on mode of action, field efficacy, non−target effects, and social acceptance

5 affiliations
  1. 1School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington
  2. 2GreenLight Biosciences Inc
  3. 3Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland
  4. 4Te Kawa a Māui– School of Māori Studies, Victoria University of Wellington
  5. 5Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki

Abstract

(hereafter varroa), a globally distributed parasitic mite and a key driver of honey bee colony losses. Here, we review laboratory, field, and social research conducted in New Zealand that has enhanced understanding of vadescana, a dsRNA biopesticide targeting calmodulin gene expression in varroa, and its commercial formulation Norroa™. Laboratory studies using mini-hive systems demonstrate that vadescana can suppress mite reproduction, primarily through disruption of embryonic development. Varroa calmodulin and calmodulin-like gene expression was suppressed. Vadescana does not appear to affect adult mite survival. Field trials in commercial beekeeping operations in both the North and South Islands have shown that vadescana can be used to manage varroa populations and maintain low infestation levels for extended periods. The efficacy of this biopesticide in maintaining low mite populations was comparable to synthetic miticides under some conditions, but variability was observed across sites, infestation levels, and management contexts. Importantly, New Zealand-based studies indicate no or minimal impacts of vadescana on honey bee larval and adult survival, foraging behaviour, colony growth, and honey production. Bioinformatic and experimental assessments have predicted a low risk of adverse effects on non-target organisms associated with beehives. Finally, we discuss remaining challenges and future directions, including resistance management, optimisation of application strategies, incorporation into varroa integrated pest management programmes, and the need for international regulatory harmonisation. Collectively, the greatest utility of Norroa™ appears to lie in maintaining low mite populations and supporting integrated pest management programmes, rather than functioning as a stand-alone, knock-down treatment under high varroa infestation pressure.

Related

  1. From eco-affective narrowing to agency: acceptance, externalization, and efficacy in climate-related cognition
    Paolo Raile
    Frontiers in cognitionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  2. Effect of Shallot Biopesticide Extract and Liquid Organic Fertilizer on Plant Growth and Suppression of Fusarium-Induced Twisting Disease
    Haryuni Haryuni, Endang Suprapti, Mugi Harsono +3
    Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology EducationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyDOAJ
  3. Varroa‐Sensitive Hygiene (VSH) as a Potential Contributor to the Natural Survival of Ethiopian Honey Bees (Apis mellifera simensis) Against Varroa destructor Mite
    Alemu Tsegaye, Tessema Aynalem, Mengistie Taye +5
    Ecology and evolutionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Silk Web Removal Enhances the Efficacy of Beauveria bassiana Treatment Against Hyphantria cunea: Insights from Immune and Physiological Parameters
    Hong Jiang, Peng Li, Ying Wang +4
    InsectsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEurope PMC
  5. Efficacy and mechanistic insights of Kluyveromyces marxianus cell wall in enhancing pear fruit resistance against Penicillium expansum
    Yalan Wu, Xin-ai Chen, Ting Yu +1
    Food Innovation and AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{lester2026norroa,
  title = {{Norroa™ as a dsRNA biopesticide for Varroa destructor: insights from New Zealand research on mode of action, field efficacy, non−target effects, and social acceptance}},
  author = {Philip John Lester and Mariana Bulgarella and Brian Manley and James D. Masucci and Rose A. McGruddy and Joana Merk and Kenneth E. Narva and Symon Palmer and O Ripeka Mercier and Zoe E. Smeele},
  journal = {Frontiers in Insect Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.3389/finsc.2026.1814622},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2026.1814622},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Norroa™ as a dsRNA biopesticide for Varroa destructor: insights from New Zealand research on mode of action, field efficacy, non−target effects, and social acceptance
AU  - Philip John Lester
AU  - Mariana Bulgarella
AU  - Brian Manley
AU  - James D. Masucci
AU  - Rose A. McGruddy
AU  - Joana Merk
AU  - Kenneth E. Narva
AU  - Symon Palmer
AU  - O Ripeka Mercier
AU  - Zoe E. Smeele
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/09
JO  - Frontiers in Insect Science
DO  - 10.3389/finsc.2026.1814622
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2026.1814622
AB  - (hereafter varroa), a globally distributed parasitic mite and a key driver of honey bee colony losses. Here, we review laboratory, field, and social research conducted in New Zealand that has enhanced understanding of vadescana, a dsRNA biopesticide targeting calmodulin gene expression in varroa, and its commercial formulation Norroa™. Laboratory studies using mini-hive systems demonstrate that vadescana can suppress mite reproduction, primarily through disruption of embryonic development. Varroa calmodulin and calmodulin-like gene expression was suppressed. Vadescana does not appear to affect adult mite survival. Field trials in commercial beekeeping operations in both the North and South Islands have shown that vadescana can be used to manage varroa populations and maintain low infestation levels for extended periods. The efficacy of this biopesticide in maintaining low mite populations was comparable to synthetic miticides under some conditions, but variability was observed across sites, infestation levels, and management contexts. Importantly, New Zealand-based studies indicate no or minimal impacts of vadescana on honey bee larval and adult survival, foraging behaviour, colony growth, and honey production. Bioinformatic and experimental assessments have predicted a low risk of adverse effects on non-target organisms associated with beehives. Finally, we discuss remaining challenges and future directions, including resistance management, optimisation of application strategies, incorporation into varroa integrated pest management programmes, and the need for international regulatory harmonisation. Collectively, the greatest utility of Norroa™ appears to lie in maintaining low mite populations and supporting integrated pest management programmes, rather than functioning as a stand-alone, knock-down treatment under high varroa infestation pressure.
SN  - 2673-8600
ER  -