Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCChemRxiv

Coverages and Configurations of CO* and H* on Pt(111) under Realistic Reaction Conditions

5 affiliations
  1. 1William G. Lowrie Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Ohio State University, 151 W. Woodruff Rd., Columbus, Ohio, 43210
  2. 2Center for Programmable Energy Catalysis
  3. 3Minnesota
  4. 4Department of Chemical Engineering
  5. 5University of California Santa Barbara

Abstract

Lateral interactions between co–adsorbed species can produce non-random spatial organization that governs the availability of reactive motifs relevant to catalytic behavior. For CO* and H* co–adsorbed on Pt(111), these interactions determine how the two species distribute across the surface and therefore which local CO*–H* configurations are available under reaction conditions. In this work, we combine density functional theory, cluster expansions, and grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations to determine how CO* and H* organize on Pt(111), and subsequently use electronic surface charge as a controlled perturbation to examine how this organization responds to changes in the underlying energetics. On neutral Pt(111), CO*–H* first-nearest-neighbor interactions are strongly repulsive (0.42 eV), CO*–CO* first-nearest-neighbor interactions are moderately repulsive (0.12 eV), and H*–H* interactions are comparatively weak. These interactions cause CO* to nucleate into islands that grow and coalesce with increasing CO* coverage, while H* preferentially occupies regions outside CO*-rich domains. Consequently, the abundance of CO*–H* nearest-neighbor configurations varies non-monotonically with CO* coverage, reaching a maximum at intermediate coverage before decreasing as CO* islands grow and the adsorbates become increasingly segregated. Positive surface charge strengthens CO* adsorption but also increases CO*–CO* repulsion, producing higher CO* coverages, a broader distribution of CO* island sizes, and larger low-coverage regions between islands where H* can adsorb away from CO*. This suppresses CO*–H* nearest-neighbor configurations relative to the neutral surface. Negative charging weakens CO* adsorption, producing lower CO* coverages, higher H* coverages, and less consolidated CO* islands, thereby increasing the prevalence of mixed CO*–H* local environments. At intermediate CO* coverage, CO* islands enter a regime of accelerated growth and coalescence that coincides with a shallow plateau in H* coverage. This coincidence suggests that the onset of CO* island coalescence is accompanied by a reorganization of the co-adsorbed layer. Further, it illustrates the strong influence of lateral interactions on the formation of potentially reactive motifs, highlighting how they become influential in determining catalytic reactivity.

Related

  1. Engineering MoOₓ-based catalysts and reaction conditions to balance deoxygenation and hydrogenation in glycerol conversion for stable propylene production
    Mohamed El Doukkali, Meryem Bahlouri, Svetlana Heyte +2
    Chemical Engineering JournalPeer-reviewedLicence not statedCatalysisHAL
  2. Hydrothermal Zn–Fe Mixed Oxide Nanocatalysts: Influence of Synthesis Conditions on Physicochemical Properties, Acidity, and Catalytic Activity in the Biginelli Reaction
    Samira Slyemi, Juliette Blanchard, Ouzna Kheffache +5
    Chemistry AfricaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textCatalysisMaterials & polymersHAL
  3. Understanding the Dynamics of C-OH Bond Activation over Mo ₂ C under Hydrodeoxygenation Reaction Conditions
    Raghavendra Meena, Albert Solé-Daura, Han Zuilhof +3
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  4. Impact of Reaction Conditions on Product Distribution in Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethane over MoVNbTeO x Catalysts.
    Yannick Weis, Martin Schubert, Andreas Meiswinkel +5
    Industrial & engineering chemistry researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCatalysisEurope PMC
  5. Realistic Simulations of Energy Materials Using Foundation Models and Electrode-Potential Learning
    Jinwoong Chae, Hyeseung Kim, Kiseop Im +11
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{hossain2026coverages,
  title = {{Coverages and Configurations of CO* and H* on Pt(111) under Realistic Reaction Conditions}},
  author = {Sifat Hossain and Venkata Rohit Punyapu and Phillip Christopher and Rachel B. Getman},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15009043/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15009043/v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Coverages and Configurations of CO* and H* on Pt(111) under Realistic Reaction Conditions
AU  - Sifat Hossain
AU  - Venkata Rohit Punyapu
AU  - Phillip Christopher
AU  - Rachel B. Getman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/18
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15009043/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15009043/v1
AB  - Lateral interactions between co–adsorbed species can produce non-random spatial organization that governs the availability of reactive motifs relevant to catalytic behavior. For CO* and H* co–adsorbed on Pt(111), these interactions determine how the two species distribute across the surface and therefore which local CO*–H* configurations are available under reaction conditions. In this work, we combine density functional theory, cluster expansions, and grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations to determine how CO* and H* organize on Pt(111), and subsequently use electronic surface charge as a controlled perturbation to examine how this organization responds to changes in the underlying energetics. On neutral Pt(111), CO*–H* first-nearest-neighbor interactions are strongly repulsive (0.42 eV), CO*–CO* first-nearest-neighbor interactions are moderately repulsive (0.12 eV), and H*–H* interactions are comparatively weak. These interactions cause CO* to nucleate into islands that grow and coalesce with increasing CO* coverage, while H* preferentially occupies regions outside CO*-rich domains. Consequently, the abundance of CO*–H* nearest-neighbor configurations varies non-monotonically with CO* coverage, reaching a maximum at intermediate coverage before decreasing as CO* islands grow and the adsorbates become increasingly segregated. Positive surface charge strengthens CO* adsorption but also increases CO*–CO* repulsion, producing higher CO* coverages, a broader distribution of CO* island sizes, and larger low-coverage regions between islands where H* can adsorb away from CO*. This suppresses CO*–H* nearest-neighbor configurations relative to the neutral surface. Negative charging weakens CO* adsorption, producing lower CO* coverages, higher H* coverages, and less consolidated CO* islands, thereby increasing the prevalence of mixed CO*–H* local environments. At intermediate CO* coverage, CO* islands enter a regime of accelerated growth and coalescence that coincides with a shallow plateau in H* coverage. This coincidence suggests that the onset of CO* island coalescence is accompanied by a reorganization of the co-adsorbed layer. Further, it illustrates the strong influence of lateral interactions on the formation of potentially reactive motifs, highlighting how they become influential in determining catalytic reactivity.
ER  -