Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

From AI Criticism to Purposeful Action: The New Human Rights as a Framework for Human-AI Cooperation

  1. 1Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt

Abstract

This conceptual article examines how human-AI cooperation can be directed toward addressing social harm. Its starting point is a question of priorities: how can criticism of artificial intelligence contribute to meaningful improvements in human life, while its analytical and productive capacities are used to address injustice, exclusion and harmful institutional structures?

Jean-Pol Martin’s New Human Rights (NMR) provide a framework organized around six basic needs: thinking, health, security, social inclusion, self-realization and participation, and meaning. Learning by Teaching (LdL) contributes an iterative process of explanation, feedback and conceptual revision.

The article’s specific contribution is a five-stage procedure: specifying the situation; mapping needs and conflicts; examining power and responsibility; developing feasible alternatives; and acting, observing and revising. A hypothetical example of digital exclusion in municipal services demonstrates how the procedure connects AI assistance with institutional responsibility and the participation of affected people.

Within the developing NMR and human-AI cooperation series, this article bridges theoretical orientation and practical intervention. It extends the discussion of needs awareness and power concentration by proposing a reusable procedure for accountable action. Prevention, reliability and sustainability guide the assessment of alternatives.

The article presents a conceptual framework and research agenda. It reports no new empirical findings. Developed by Jean-Pol Martin in dialogue with ChatGPT.

Related

  1. H.5. Round Table: How to use human rights-based advocacy and legal action to advance public health
    EUPHA Law and Public Health section, EUPHA Ethics in Public Health section, EUPHA Global Health section, Groningen Centre for Health Law (Netherlands), GNAPH PHEL Network, Department of Public Health Simmons University (USA), Johns Hopkins Lerner Center for Public Health Advocacy (USA), Farhang Tahzib, Andreea Badache
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPMCEurope PMC
  2. An emergency decision support framework for flight-deck accidents: integrating dynamic adjudication, multi-agent cooperation, and hierarchical path planning
    Jianwei Huang, Yue Hou, Kangbo Wang +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Crossref
  3. Assessment of Healthcare Workers’ Understanding of PLHIV’s Rights Based on the Framework of HIV and AIDS Act 2017 in India
    Shivangi Das, Asmita Patnaik, Kalolini D. Samant +11
    Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CarePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textInfectious diseasePMC
  4. From Pester Power to Purposeful Co-Shopping, a Dual-Pathway PLS-SEM Model: The Influence of Children’s Food Purchases in Urban India
    Murale Venugopalan, Preetha R., Gyanendra Singh Sisodia
    Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  5. Social psychology and life design meet product design: how to craft a purposeful path, creating roadmaps for meaningful career futures
    Elisabetta Camussi, Francesco Zurlo, Venanzio Arquilla +5
    Frontiers in psychologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{martin2026from,
  title = {{From AI Criticism to Purposeful Action: The New Human Rights as a Framework for Human-AI Cooperation}},
  author = {Jean-Pol Martin},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23639045},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23639045},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - From AI Criticism to Purposeful Action: The New Human Rights as a Framework for Human-AI Cooperation
AU  - Jean-Pol Martin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23639045
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23639045
AB  - This conceptual article examines how human-AI cooperation can be directed toward addressing social harm. Its starting point is a question of priorities: how can criticism of artificial intelligence contribute to meaningful improvements in human life, while its analytical and productive capacities are used to address injustice, exclusion and harmful institutional structures?  Jean-Pol Martin’s New Human Rights (NMR) provide a framework organized around six basic needs: thinking, health, security, social inclusion, self-realization and participation, and meaning. Learning by Teaching (LdL) contributes an iterative process of explanation, feedback and conceptual revision.  The article’s specific contribution is a five-stage procedure: specifying the situation; mapping needs and conflicts; examining power and responsibility; developing feasible alternatives; and acting, observing and revising. A hypothetical example of digital exclusion in municipal services demonstrates how the procedure connects AI assistance with institutional responsibility and the participation of affected people.  Within the developing NMR and human-AI cooperation series, this article bridges theoretical orientation and practical intervention. It extends the discussion of needs awareness and power concentration by proposing a reusable procedure for accountable action. Prevention, reliability and sustainability guide the assessment of alternatives.  The article presents a conceptual framework and research agenda. It reports no new empirical findings. Developed by Jean-Pol Martin in dialogue with ChatGPT.
ER  -