Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Psycho-Oncology

Breaking the Silence: A Mixed Methods Analysis Unveiling Barriers to Mental Health Service Use in Breast Cancer Survivors With Clinically Significant Distress

4 affiliations
  1. 1Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA
  2. 2Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA
  3. 3Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health Indiana University Indianapolis Indianapolis Indiana USA
  4. 4William M. Tierney Center for Health Services Research Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Indianapolis Indiana USA

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer survivors are at elevated risk for psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, and post‐traumatic stress (PTS), compared to healthy controls. Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is particularly prevalent, with approximately 50% of breast cancer survivors reporting clinically significant FCR.

Aims: This mixed methods study examined associations among psychological distress, mental health service (MHS) use, and barriers to MHS use among breast cancer survivors.

Methods: Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods design, we analyzed baseline data from 384 early‐stage, post‐treatment breast cancer survivors with clinically significant FCR enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Associations between distress symptoms and MHS use were examined. Subsequently, qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 distressed breast cancer survivors to explore barriers to MHS use.

Results: Of 298 (77.81%) breast cancer survivors with at least one clinically significant distress measure, only 61 (20.47%) reported MHS use within the prior 3 months. Anxiety (p = 0.0030), depression (p = 0.0015), and PTS (p = 0.0387) symptoms were significantly associated with MHS use, whereas FCR was associated with fewer MHS visits. Interviews revealed barriers including avoidant coping, financial and logistical challenges, and limited access to timely, integrated care, as well as suggestions for improved support.

Conclusions: Few clinically distressed breast cancer survivors utilize MHS. Anxiety, depression, and PTS symptoms may better predict MHS use than FCR, potentially due to avoidant coping among fearful survivors. Interventions targeting avoidance, alongside survivor‐informed improvements in mental health care delivery, may enhance MHS access and outcomes.

Trial Registration: NCT05364450

Related

  1. Characterization and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Clinically Significant Non-fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated From Clinical Specimens
    Dhanashree R Chavan, Ravindra V Shinde, Satish R Patil
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Transcatheter atrial septal defect closure in infants weighing 3 to 6 kg with clinically significant bronchopulmonary dysplasia
    Ernesto Mejia, Anne C Taylor, Martin L Bocks +1
    JTCVS Structural and EndovascularPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCEurope PMC
  3. Validation of the discriminatory performance of the iPREFACE score for clinically significant fetal acidemia: an outcome-enriched nested case–control study
    Ayumu Ito, Mio Kamiya, Eijiro Hayata +2
    AJOG global reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Clinically significant neck pain and tablet tilt angles in real-world educational settings: A nationwide cross-sectional study of university students
    Saikaew Chuachan, Jetsadakorn Thawornrattanachot, Jakrapan Sen +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  5. Strategies to establish a biologically defined Parkinson's disease cohort prior to the onset of clinically significant motor symptoms
    Ethan G. Brown, Helena Blumenau, David-Erick Lafontant +17
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurologymedRxivPMC
BibTeX
@article{danner2026breaking,
  title = {{Breaking the Silence: A Mixed Methods Analysis Unveiling Barriers to Mental Health Service Use in Breast Cancer Survivors With Clinically Significant Distress}},
  author = {Ana Danner and Tayler Gowan and Madison Schwarz and Matthew Hays and Yang Li and Shelley A. Johns},
  journal = {Psycho-Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/pon.70599},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70599},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Breaking the Silence: A Mixed Methods Analysis Unveiling Barriers to Mental Health Service Use in Breast Cancer Survivors With Clinically Significant Distress
AU  - Ana Danner
AU  - Tayler Gowan
AU  - Madison Schwarz
AU  - Matthew Hays
AU  - Yang Li
AU  - Shelley A. Johns
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
JO  - Psycho-Oncology
DO  - 10.1002/pon.70599
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70599
AB  - Background: Breast cancer survivors are at elevated risk for psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, and post‐traumatic stress (PTS), compared to healthy controls. Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is particularly prevalent, with approximately 50% of breast cancer survivors reporting clinically significant FCR.  Aims: This mixed methods study examined associations among psychological distress, mental health service (MHS) use, and barriers to MHS use among breast cancer survivors.  Methods: Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods design, we analyzed baseline data from 384 early‐stage, post‐treatment breast cancer survivors with clinically significant FCR enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Associations between distress symptoms and MHS use were examined. Subsequently, qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 distressed breast cancer survivors to explore barriers to MHS use.  Results: Of 298 (77.81%) breast cancer survivors with at least one clinically significant distress measure, only 61 (20.47%) reported MHS use within the prior 3 months. Anxiety (p = 0.0030), depression (p = 0.0015), and PTS (p = 0.0387) symptoms were significantly associated with MHS use, whereas FCR was associated with fewer MHS visits. Interviews revealed barriers including avoidant coping, financial and logistical challenges, and limited access to timely, integrated care, as well as suggestions for improved support.  Conclusions: Few clinically distressed breast cancer survivors utilize MHS. Anxiety, depression, and PTS symptoms may better predict MHS use than FCR, potentially due to avoidant coping among fearful survivors. Interventions targeting avoidance, alongside survivor‐informed improvements in mental health care delivery, may enhance MHS access and outcomes.  Trial Registration: NCT05364450
SN  - 1057-9249
SN  - 1099-1611
ER  -