Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYSoil Security

Perceptions and adaptive responses to soil salinity in irrigated systems of the Abaya–Chamo Lakes Basin, Ethiopia

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Natural Resource Management, Arba Minch University, P.O. Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia; Corresponding author.
  2. 2Department of Plant Sciences, Arba Minch University, P. O. Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
  3. 3Department of Natural Resource Management, Arba Minch University, P.O. Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
  4. 4Department of Horticulture, Arba Minch University, P. O. Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia

Abstract

Soil salinization threatens agricultural sustainability, food security, and essential soil functions in arid and semi-arid regions, including Ethiopia's Abaya–Chamo Lakes Basin. This study assessed smallholder farmers' perceptions of soil salinity and their adaptive strategies within irrigated farming systems. A mixed-methods design was employed, drawing on household survey data from 380 farmers selected through multistage stratified random sampling across five purposively selected kebeles, complemented by key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations. Data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistical techniques: descriptive statistics summarized household profiles, farm-level attributes, and socioeconomic conditions, while multinomial logistic regression identified the determinants of adaptation choices. Most farmers rated salinity severity as severe (98.9%) and chronic (50.5%), while technical awareness of salinity dynamics remained moderate (51.3%). Salinity moderately affected cultivated land for 53.9% of respondents and caused severe yield losses for 65.0% of farmers, particularly in banana (43.2%) and maize (33.9%) production systems. Farmers' vulnerability was compounded by heavy dependence on-farm income (47.9%) and limited livelihood diversification (81.6%). Dissatisfaction with institutional support for salinity management was widespread (91.9%), reflected in a low mean satisfaction score of 1.45. Farming experience, landholding size, labor availability, and income diversification significantly influenced adaptation and coping decisions. The findings reveal a capacity–vulnerability paradox, whereby better-resourced farmers adopt more advanced adaptation measures yet may still incur larger absolute income losses. Strengthening resilience in the study area therefore requires integrated interventions that combine technical salinity management, enhanced institutional support, and livelihood diversification.

Related

  1. Climate change and internal migration nexus in Ethiopia a narrative review of drivers, patterns, and policy responses from 2000 to 2025
    Girma Senbetie Asefawu, David Sungho Park
    Discover SustainabilityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  2. Mitigating Heavy Metal Uptake in Wastewater-Irrigated Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) through Biochar and L-Methionine Application
    Trends in Animal and Plant SciencesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text5 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionOpenAlex
  3. Intensification of irrigated agriculture and precipitation explain rising evapotranspiration in the Snake River Basin despite declining atmospheric demand
    Meetpal Singh Kukal, Dinesh Gulati, Meng Zhao +2
    Journal of Hydrology: Regional StudiesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
  4. Delineating season-specific hotspots: A spatio-temporal risk assessment of neck blast disease in rainfed and irrigated ecosystems of Cumilla District, Bangladesh
    Md. Mamunur Rashid, Niaz Md. Farhat Rahman, Nazmul Haque +8
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyPlant biologyPLOS
  5. Systematic overestimation of evapotranspiration over irrigated areas by an offline land surface model
    Tanguy Lunel, Belén Martí, Aaron Boone +1
    Hydrology and Earth System SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{apira2026perceptions,
  title = {{Perceptions and adaptive responses to soil salinity in irrigated systems of the Abaya–Chamo Lakes Basin, Ethiopia}},
  author = {Yohannes Golida Apira and Dereje Tsegaye Salfeko and Tizita Endale Elcho and Azmera Walche Mengesha},
  journal = {Soil Security},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.soisec.2026.100253},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2026.100253},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Perceptions and adaptive responses to soil salinity in irrigated systems of the Abaya–Chamo Lakes Basin, Ethiopia
AU  - Yohannes Golida Apira
AU  - Dereje Tsegaye Salfeko
AU  - Tizita Endale Elcho
AU  - Azmera Walche Mengesha
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Soil Security
DO  - 10.1016/j.soisec.2026.100253
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2026.100253
AB  - Soil salinization threatens agricultural sustainability, food security, and essential soil functions in arid and semi-arid regions, including Ethiopia's Abaya–Chamo Lakes Basin. This study assessed smallholder farmers' perceptions of soil salinity and their adaptive strategies within irrigated farming systems. A mixed-methods design was employed, drawing on household survey data from 380 farmers selected through multistage stratified random sampling across five purposively selected kebeles, complemented by key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations. Data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistical techniques: descriptive statistics summarized household profiles, farm-level attributes, and socioeconomic conditions, while multinomial logistic regression identified the determinants of adaptation choices. Most farmers rated salinity severity as severe (98.9%) and chronic (50.5%), while technical awareness of salinity dynamics remained moderate (51.3%). Salinity moderately affected cultivated land for 53.9% of respondents and caused severe yield losses for 65.0% of farmers, particularly in banana (43.2%) and maize (33.9%) production systems. Farmers' vulnerability was compounded by heavy dependence on-farm income (47.9%) and limited livelihood diversification (81.6%). Dissatisfaction with institutional support for salinity management was widespread (91.9%), reflected in a low mean satisfaction score of 1.45. Farming experience, landholding size, labor availability, and income diversification significantly influenced adaptation and coping decisions. The findings reveal a capacity–vulnerability paradox, whereby better-resourced farmers adopt more advanced adaptation measures yet may still incur larger absolute income losses. Strengthening resilience in the study area therefore requires integrated interventions that combine technical salinity management, enhanced institutional support, and livelihood diversification.
SN  - 2667-0062
ER  -