Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYNeuroImage

Real-time measurement instead of prediction enables high-precision phase-specific stimulation of the human brain

  1. 1Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital and University of Tübingen, Tübingen, 72076, Germany

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phase-specific brain stimulation provides a tool to probe the functional relevance of ongoing neural oscillations. Current closed-loop stimulation approaches often use predictive algorithms to compensate for processing and stimulation delays, but prediction error can limit phase-targeting accuracy, particularly at higher frequencies. A real-time approach that minimizes latency without relying on phase prediction may improve the precision and interpretability of phase-specific stimulation. METHODS: In this technical proof-of-concept study, we developed and validated a prototype real-time closed-loop system for electroencephalography-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation (EEG-TMS). The system performs signal acquisition, phase estimation, and stimulation triggering within a 1 ms closed-loop update cycle and does not require phase prediction. Empirical testing was performed in human participants receiving EEG-triggered TMS across eight target phases and ten target frequencies ranging from 4 to 40 Hz. RESULTS: Across all target phases and frequencies, the system achieved single-digit phase accuracy without phase prediction. On average, stimulation was 5.6° away from the intended target phase. The typical single-pulse error was 3.7°, and trial-to-trial variability was 7.8° These results indicate stable phase-targeting performance across the tested phase and frequency range. CONCLUSION: This real-time EEG-TMS system demonstrates the technical feasibility of prediction-free phase-specific stimulation across physiologically relevant frequencies. By reducing dependence on predictive phase extrapolation, the approach provides a platform for studying phase-dependent brain physiology and for developing closed-loop neuromodulation protocols with improved temporal precision.

Related

  1. Advancing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression: Novel Protocols, Precision Targeting, and Future Directions
    Wenzhong Liu, Yang Fan, Pingping Ma +4
    Alpha PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
  2. Patient-specific subnetwork connectivity predicts deep brain stimulation response in obsessive-compulsive disorder
    Robert L. Seilheimer, Nikolaos Vardalakis, Wonkyung Choi +16
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxivPMC
  3. Prediction of Spinal Pain Intensity from Perception-Dependent Stimulation Thresholds and Patient Characteristics: A Regression and Machine Learning Approach
    Kübra Okuyucu, Aybike Şenel, Ahmet Gülünay +1
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Physics-informed neural operators for rapid electric field prediction in transcranial magnetic stimulation of healthy and tumor subjects
    Philipp Moser, Fabian Greifeneder, Dominik Freinberger +6
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  5. Measurement precision matters: Accounting for uncertainty alters estimated memory trajectories across the cognitive spectrum
    Emily H. Trittschuh, Phoebe Scollard, Paul K. Crane +5
    Alzheimer's & DementiaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{guggenberger2026realtime,
  title = {{Real-time measurement instead of prediction enables high-precision phase-specific stimulation of the human brain}},
  author = {Robert Guggenberger and Farzin Negahbani and Julian-Samuel Gebühr and Marius Keute and Alireza Gharabaghi},
  journal = {NeuroImage},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122216},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122216},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Real-time measurement instead of prediction enables high-precision phase-specific stimulation of the human brain
AU  - Robert Guggenberger
AU  - Farzin Negahbani
AU  - Julian-Samuel Gebühr
AU  - Marius Keute
AU  - Alireza Gharabaghi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
JO  - NeuroImage
DO  - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122216
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122216
AB  - BACKGROUND: Phase-specific brain stimulation provides a tool to probe the functional relevance of ongoing neural oscillations. Current closed-loop stimulation approaches often use predictive algorithms to compensate for processing and stimulation delays, but prediction error can limit phase-targeting accuracy, particularly at higher frequencies. A real-time approach that minimizes latency without relying on phase prediction may improve the precision and interpretability of phase-specific stimulation. METHODS: In this technical proof-of-concept study, we developed and validated a prototype real-time closed-loop system for electroencephalography-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation (EEG-TMS). The system performs signal acquisition, phase estimation, and stimulation triggering within a 1 ms closed-loop update cycle and does not require phase prediction. Empirical testing was performed in human participants receiving EEG-triggered TMS across eight target phases and ten target frequencies ranging from 4 to 40 Hz. RESULTS: Across all target phases and frequencies, the system achieved single-digit phase accuracy without phase prediction. On average, stimulation was 5.6° away from the intended target phase. The typical single-pulse error was 3.7°, and trial-to-trial variability was 7.8° These results indicate stable phase-targeting performance across the tested phase and frequency range. CONCLUSION: This real-time EEG-TMS system demonstrates the technical feasibility of prediction-free phase-specific stimulation across physiologically relevant frequencies. By reducing dependence on predictive phase extrapolation, the approach provides a platform for studying phase-dependent brain physiology and for developing closed-loop neuromodulation protocols with improved temporal precision.
SN  - 1053-8119
SN  - 1095-9572
ER  -