Anthropometric PHV-prediction models versus skeletal age in elite Chinese U12–U13 male soccer players: a cross-sectional study
- 1China Institute of Sport Science, General Administration of Sport of China, Beijing, China
- 2Chinese Football Association, Beijing, China
- 3Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China
Abstract
Background: Assessing biological maturity in youth soccer helps reduce maturity-related selection bias. Anthropometric peak height velocity (PHV) prediction models provide non-invasive, repeatable tools for maturity monitoring, but their performance relative to skeletal-age (SA) indicators remains insufficiently examined in Chinese youth athletes. We evaluated the association, discrimination, and age-group performance of PHV-derived indicators (MO and APHV) from three models against SA in Chinese elite U12–U13 male soccer players.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 313 elite male players (123 U12, 190 U13) underwent anthropometry and left hand-wrist radiography. SA was assessed with the CHN05 standard by two blinded experts. MO and APHV were computed with the Mirwald [1], Moore [2], and Fransen [3] models. Correlation, one-way ANOVA, ordinal logistic regression, and ROC analyses compared raw PHV-derived indicators with SA-derived maturity status.
Results: SA inter-rater reliability was excellent (U12 ICC = 0.967; U13 ICC = 0.992). SO was negatively correlated with APHV (r = − 0.797 to − 0.651) and SA was positively correlated with MO (r = 0.573 to 0.716; all p < 0.001); these associations remained significant after adjustment for chronological age. All models differentiated SA-based maturity groups (all p < 0.001; η² = 0.22 to 0.53), with APHV models yielding higher Nagelkerke pseudo-R² than MO models. ROC discrimination was acceptable-to-excellent (AUC = 0.757 to 0.964, higher for APHV than MO). Individual error was larger in U13 than U12 (MAE 0.45 to 0.70 years). Bland–Altman limits of agreement were wide ( ≈ ± 1.1 to ± 1.8 years) with significant proportional bias.
Conclusions: The PHV-derived indicators showed meaningful association and discrimination relative to SA and can supplement squad-wide monitoring. At the group level the three models were broadly comparable, with none uniformly superior and APHV outperforming MO. At the individual level, accuracy was limited: the limits of agreement exceeded the ± 1-year maturity-category band and showed proportional bias. Model performance differed by purpose and age group: the Moore model produced the narrowest range and largest individual-level error and suited group ranking, whereas Fransen was closest to SA in U12 and Mirwald in U13. These findings support their supplementary use in this population and the need for future longitudinal calibration.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01931-2.
Related
- Peripheral Nerve Conduction and Anthropometric Characteristics in Elite American Football Players: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study
- A cross-sectional study on anthropometric indices and hypertension in Chinese adults: comparison of discriminatory power and age-stratified analysis
- Anthropometric, reach jump, medicine-ball throw and lateral movement differences among elite female volleyball players: a field-based assessment
- Associations among quality of life, depressive symptoms, body shape concerns, anthropometric characteristics, and diet quality in women with PMOS: a cross-sectional study
- Association between anthropometric indices and serum liver enzyme levels in Iranian older adults: A cross-sectional study based on the Neyshabur Longitudinal Study on Ageing (NeLSA).
BibTeX
@article{li2026anthropometric,
title = {{Anthropometric PHV-prediction models versus skeletal age in elite Chinese U12–U13 male soccer players: a cross-sectional study}},
author = {Yue Li and Haipeng Li and Yi Song and Zhe Ren and Bin Zhang},
journal = {BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s13102-026-01931-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01931-2},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Anthropometric PHV-prediction models versus skeletal age in elite Chinese U12–U13 male soccer players: a cross-sectional study
AU - Yue Li
AU - Haipeng Li
AU - Yi Song
AU - Zhe Ren
AU - Bin Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/07
JO - BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
DO - 10.1186/s13102-026-01931-2
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01931-2
AB - Background: Assessing biological maturity in youth soccer helps reduce maturity-related selection bias. Anthropometric peak height velocity (PHV) prediction models provide non-invasive, repeatable tools for maturity monitoring, but their performance relative to skeletal-age (SA) indicators remains insufficiently examined in Chinese youth athletes. We evaluated the association, discrimination, and age-group performance of PHV-derived indicators (MO and APHV) from three models against SA in Chinese elite U12–U13 male soccer players. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 313 elite male players (123 U12, 190 U13) underwent anthropometry and left hand-wrist radiography. SA was assessed with the CHN05 standard by two blinded experts. MO and APHV were computed with the Mirwald [1], Moore [2], and Fransen [3] models. Correlation, one-way ANOVA, ordinal logistic regression, and ROC analyses compared raw PHV-derived indicators with SA-derived maturity status. Results: SA inter-rater reliability was excellent (U12 ICC = 0.967; U13 ICC = 0.992). SO was negatively correlated with APHV (r = − 0.797 to − 0.651) and SA was positively correlated with MO (r = 0.573 to 0.716; all p < 0.001); these associations remained significant after adjustment for chronological age. All models differentiated SA-based maturity groups (all p < 0.001; η² = 0.22 to 0.53), with APHV models yielding higher Nagelkerke pseudo-R² than MO models. ROC discrimination was acceptable-to-excellent (AUC = 0.757 to 0.964, higher for APHV than MO). Individual error was larger in U13 than U12 (MAE 0.45 to 0.70 years). Bland–Altman limits of agreement were wide ( ≈ ± 1.1 to ± 1.8 years) with significant proportional bias. Conclusions: The PHV-derived indicators showed meaningful association and discrimination relative to SA and can supplement squad-wide monitoring. At the group level the three models were broadly comparable, with none uniformly superior and APHV outperforming MO. At the individual level, accuracy was limited: the limits of agreement exceeded the ± 1-year maturity-category band and showed proportional bias. Model performance differed by purpose and age group: the Moore model produced the narrowest range and largest individual-level error and suited group ranking, whereas Fransen was closest to SA in U12 and Mirwald in U13. These findings support their supplementary use in this population and the need for future longitudinal calibration. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01931-2.
SN - 2052-1847
ER -