Learning Curve, Training, and Operator Experience in Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review
- 1Gynecology, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, COD
- 2Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, COD
Abstract
Vaginoscopic hysteroscopy, also known as the no-touch technique, is widely used in outpatient gynecologic practice, but the experience required to achieve reproducible competence remains uncertain. This systematic review synthesized clinical and simulation-based evidence on learning curves, training, operator experience, technical performance, and competency assessment in vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Eligible reports explicitly described vaginoscopic or no-touch access and evaluated at least one learning-related outcome. The included studies differed substantially in design, operator experience, training context, and definitions of technical performance. Clinical reports suggested improvement in procedural efficiency and success with experience, while simulation-based studies identified differences in technical performance between operators of varying experience. However, procedural speed, overall outpatient hysteroscopy proficiency, and vaginoscopy-specific competence were not assessed consistently, and the available evidence did not establish a validated, universal case-number threshold for independent vaginoscopic cervical access. No included clinical study established an individualized competency threshold for vaginoscopic access using sequential learning-curve methodology. These findings favor multidimensional, performance-based assessment rather than reliance on procedure counts alone and support prospective studies with standardized success criteria and individualized monitoring.
Related
- Evaluating the effectiveness of the SPICES model in enhancing students' learning experience in social medicine and public health field training at jiroft university of medical sciences, Iran.
- Independent Associations of Body Composition with Dance Training Experience, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behavior Among Polish Folk Dancers: A Cross-Sectional Study
- The Relevance of Otorhinolaryngology in Social and Economical Vulnerability Scenarios and its Role in Medical Training: Experience of FMUSP's Bandeira Científica in 2025
- The Role of Hysteroscopy in Reproductive Medicine and Subfertility: A Critical Narrative Review
- Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access Training: A Single-Center Experience Using Gelatin-Based Simulation Models
BibTeX
@article{sibo2026learning,
title = {{Learning Curve, Training, and Operator Experience in Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review}},
author = {Guy lambert M Monzango Sibo and Phaka Phoba},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.118081},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719143},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Learning Curve, Training, and Operator Experience in Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review
AU - Guy lambert M Monzango Sibo
AU - Phaka Phoba
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/17
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.118081
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719143
AB - Vaginoscopic hysteroscopy, also known as the no-touch technique, is widely used in outpatient gynecologic practice, but the experience required to achieve reproducible competence remains uncertain. This systematic review synthesized clinical and simulation-based evidence on learning curves, training, operator experience, technical performance, and competency assessment in vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Eligible reports explicitly described vaginoscopic or no-touch access and evaluated at least one learning-related outcome. The included studies differed substantially in design, operator experience, training context, and definitions of technical performance. Clinical reports suggested improvement in procedural efficiency and success with experience, while simulation-based studies identified differences in technical performance between operators of varying experience. However, procedural speed, overall outpatient hysteroscopy proficiency, and vaginoscopy-specific competence were not assessed consistently, and the available evidence did not establish a validated, universal case-number threshold for independent vaginoscopic cervical access. No included clinical study established an individualized competency threshold for vaginoscopic access using sequential learning-curve methodology. These findings favor multidimensional, performance-based assessment rather than reliance on procedure counts alone and support prospective studies with standardized success criteria and individualized monitoring.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -