Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Attraction to hierarchical feature memory explains orientation bias

Abstract

When recalling the orientation of recent stimuli, observers are systematically biased away from the cardinal axes. The prevailing explanation is that this ''anti-cardinal bias'' arises because cardinal orientations are encoded with greater neural resources and therefore less noise, consistent with efficient coding of environmentally common features. Under this account, the bias should occur independently for each stimulus; any serial attraction towards previously seen orientations should be independent of absolute orientation. By contrast, we find that serial effects in orientation recall are unexpectedly strong and reflect a hitherto unrecognised hierarchical interaction, consistent with recurrent connectivity across hierarchies of sensory processing in the brain. We found that serial dependence in visual orientation recall is dominated not by attraction to the previous orientation itself, but to a compound feature representing both a tilt and its mirror reflection about the cardinal axes. Consistent with greater spatial abstraction at higher levels, the influence of this compound feature persisted across the visual midline, whereas orientation-specific effects weakened between hemifields. We developed a quantitative model based on the optimal combination of a noisy representation of the current stimulus with a hierarchical memory trace incorporating these compound features. Remarkably, although the coding fidelity was uniform across angles, this model accurately reproduced not only the serial dependence, but also the anti-cardinal bias. Our results suggest that memory traces are not isolated to single features, but reflect compound reactivation of hierarchical representations. Furthermore, they reveal that inference across hierarchical representations can generate systematic perceptual distortions previously ascribed to coding constraints.

Related

  1. Memory retrieval explains dynamic effects of expectations on perceptual decisions
    A. Khoudary, M. A. K. Peters, a. bornstein
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. A hierarchical framework of representational emergence: From feature binding to supramodal emergence
    Evangelos Paraskevopoulos, Panagiotis Bamidis
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCell PressCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. A generative network model reveals hierarchical structural memory guiding post-mitotic 3D genome inheritance
    L. Morelli, S. Cretti, D. Michelatti +6
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  4. A hierarchical memory architecture overcomes context limits in long-horizon multi-agent computational modeling
    Shivendra G. Tewari, Holly Kimko
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBioinformatics & computational biologyarXiv
  5. Hierarchical feature binding in a spiking neural network model of the primate ventral visual pathway
    Brian Gardner, Patrick T. McCarthy, Joseph Chrol-Cannon +4
    PLOS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePhysiologyPLOS
BibTeX
@misc{dusterwald2026attraction,
  title = {{Attraction to hierarchical feature memory explains orientation bias}},
  author = {Kira Michaela Düsterwald and Peter Vincent and Ana Kapros and Athena Akrami and Maneesh Sahani},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.40204},
  eprint = {2609.40204},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.40204},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Attraction to hierarchical feature memory explains orientation bias
AU  - Kira Michaela Düsterwald
AU  - Peter Vincent
AU  - Ana Kapros
AU  - Athena Akrami
AU  - Maneesh Sahani
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.40204
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.40204
AB  - When recalling the orientation of recent stimuli, observers are systematically biased away from the cardinal axes. The prevailing explanation is that this ''anti-cardinal bias'' arises because cardinal orientations are encoded with greater neural resources and therefore less noise, consistent with efficient coding of environmentally common features. Under this account, the bias should occur independently for each stimulus; any serial attraction towards previously seen orientations should be independent of absolute orientation. By contrast, we find that serial effects in orientation recall are unexpectedly strong and reflect a hitherto unrecognised hierarchical interaction, consistent with recurrent connectivity across hierarchies of sensory processing in the brain. We found that serial dependence in visual orientation recall is dominated not by attraction to the previous orientation itself, but to a compound feature representing both a tilt and its mirror reflection about the cardinal axes. Consistent with greater spatial abstraction at higher levels, the influence of this compound feature persisted across the visual midline, whereas orientation-specific effects weakened between hemifields. We developed a quantitative model based on the optimal combination of a noisy representation of the current stimulus with a hierarchical memory trace incorporating these compound features. Remarkably, although the coding fidelity was uniform across angles, this model accurately reproduced not only the serial dependence, but also the anti-cardinal bias. Our results suggest that memory traces are not isolated to single features, but reflect compound reactivation of hierarchical representations. Furthermore, they reveal that inference across hierarchical representations can generate systematic perceptual distortions previously ascribed to coding constraints.
ER  -