Quantile Regression Postprocessing with Negative Electricity Price Forecasts
Abstract
Negative electricity prices create market-relevant risks for trading, bidding, renewable revenues, and flexibility valuation. Quantile regression-based postprocessing is a widely used approach for converting point forecasts into predictive distributions. We show that the standard specification, which imposes a single linear relationship between the point forecast and predictive quantiles, can become structurally incoherent when the conditioning point forecast is negative. In such cases, the resulting predictive distribution may exhibit not only ordinary quantile crossing, where adjacent quantiles are in the wrong order, but also a severe version of crossing, which we refer to as tail-quantile inversion. This can reverse downside and upside risk signals. To address this problem, we propose sign-dependent QR-based postprocessing specifications that allow the quantile function to differ between positive and negative point forecasts. Using German day-ahead electricity prices as an empirical illustration, we show that these specifications improve predictive accuracy, particularly for negative point forecasts and for extreme probability levels. Moreover, when combined with joint estimation across quantiles, the sign-dependent specifications largely eliminate tail-quantile inversion and all quantile crossing. The results demonstrate that the sign of the point forecast should be explicitly accounted for when constructing probabilistic forecasts in markets where negative prices can occur.
Related
- Tail reliability in probabilistic electricity price forecasts: comparing model combination and conformal prediction in the GB day-ahead market
- Quantile-Only Regression: Inference and Partial Identification under Quantile Disclosure
- Clouded Representatives and Score Matching for Distributed Quantile Regression
- A New Framework for Estimation of Unconditional Quantile Treatment Effects: The Residualized Quantile Regression (RQR) Model
- Conformalized Quantile Regression and Minimax Limits of Fixed-Score Calibration under Known Covariate Shift
BibTeX
@misc{uniejewski2026quantile,
title = {{Quantile Regression Postprocessing with Negative Electricity Price Forecasts}},
author = {Bartosz Uniejewski and James W. Taylor},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.35885},
eprint = {2610.35885},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35885},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Quantile Regression Postprocessing with Negative Electricity Price Forecasts
AU - Bartosz Uniejewski
AU - James W. Taylor
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.35885
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35885
AB - Negative electricity prices create market-relevant risks for trading, bidding, renewable revenues, and flexibility valuation. Quantile regression-based postprocessing is a widely used approach for converting point forecasts into predictive distributions. We show that the standard specification, which imposes a single linear relationship between the point forecast and predictive quantiles, can become structurally incoherent when the conditioning point forecast is negative. In such cases, the resulting predictive distribution may exhibit not only ordinary quantile crossing, where adjacent quantiles are in the wrong order, but also a severe version of crossing, which we refer to as tail-quantile inversion. This can reverse downside and upside risk signals. To address this problem, we propose sign-dependent QR-based postprocessing specifications that allow the quantile function to differ between positive and negative point forecasts. Using German day-ahead electricity prices as an empirical illustration, we show that these specifications improve predictive accuracy, particularly for negative point forecasts and for extreme probability levels. Moreover, when combined with joint estimation across quantiles, the sign-dependent specifications largely eliminate tail-quantile inversion and all quantile crossing. The results demonstrate that the sign of the point forecast should be explicitly accounted for when constructing probabilistic forecasts in markets where negative prices can occur.
ER -