Surface EMG Characterization of the Jefferson Curl at a Submaximal Load Matched to the Romanian Deadlift: A Cross-Sectional Study in Resistance-Trained Adults
- 1Biomedical Engineering Technion - Israel Institute of Technology.
- 2Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University.
- 3The Institute of Active Lifestyle Palacký University Olomouc.
Abstract
Background
The Jefferson curl, a loaded spinal flexion exercise, has gained popularity in strength and rehabilitation practice but lacks empirical characterization. Whether it elicits different posterior-chain activation than the Romanian deadlift (RDL), a well-documented hip-hinge exercise, at a matched submaximal load is unknown. Hypothesis/Purpose: To characterize erector spinae activation during the Jefferson curl at a submaximal load and test the hypothesis that, at the same absolute load, the Jefferson curl elicits greater erector spinae activation than the RDL; and to describe gluteus maximus and biceps femoris activation without a directional hypothesis.Study design
Cross-sectional observational study.Methods
Twenty-one resistance-trained adults performed five repetitions of the Jefferson curl and of the RDL on a 30-cm platform. Load was adjusted to a Borg RPE of 16 during the Jefferson curl, and the same absolute load was used for the RDL. Surface EMG was recorded from the upper, middle, and lower erector spinae, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris bilaterally and normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC). Left and right values were averaged. A linear mixed-effects model with exercise*muscle fixed effects and participant as a random intercept was used. Benjamini-Hochberg procedure controlled the false discovery rate.Results
The Jefferson curl elicited higher mean activation than the RDL in the upper erector spinae (62.84 vs 44.52 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.003, Hedges' g=0.83), lower erector spinae (60.07 vs 47.85 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.035, g=0.49), and biceps femoris (54.18 vs 41.54 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.035, g=0.60). The middle erector spinae and gluteus maximus activation did not differ significantly (adjusted p≥0.45).Conclusion
In resistance-trained adults, the Jefferson curl at a submaximal load produced greater upper- and lower-erector spinae and biceps femoris activation than the RDL at the same absolute load. The Jefferson curl can be considered when designing targeted recruitment of the erector spinae and hamstrings through controlled spinal flexion.Level of evidence
3.
Related
- Multipathogen antimicrobial resistance in a Romanian tertiary-care hospital: a retrospective antibiogram analysis, January–July 2025
- Physiological characterization using standardized submaximal treadmill responses in professional male soccer players.
- Score Distributions of the Mini-Mental State Examination, Clock Drawing Test, and Reisberg Global Deterioration Scale Across Operational Cognitive Impairment Severity Strata in Romanian Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study
- Clinical AI Liability Literacy, Disclosure Confidence, and Adoption Readiness Among Romanian Healthcare Professionals: An Exploratory Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.
- Systemic inflammatory responses to maximal versus submaximal lengthening contractions of the elbow flexors
BibTeX
@article{yona2026surface,
title = {{Surface EMG Characterization of the Jefferson Curl at a Submaximal Load Matched to the Romanian Deadlift: A Cross-Sectional Study in Resistance-Trained Adults}},
author = {Tomer Yona and Bar Kalifa and Segev Gildar and Raz Margi and Itai Har-Nir and Arielle G Fischer},
journal = {International journal of sports physical therapy},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.26603/001c.172559},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13727010},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Surface EMG Characterization of the Jefferson Curl at a Submaximal Load Matched to the Romanian Deadlift: A Cross-Sectional Study in Resistance-Trained Adults
AU - Tomer Yona
AU - Bar Kalifa
AU - Segev Gildar
AU - Raz Margi
AU - Itai Har-Nir
AU - Arielle G Fischer
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/01
JO - International journal of sports physical therapy
DO - 10.26603/001c.172559
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13727010
AB - Background The Jefferson curl, a loaded spinal flexion exercise, has gained popularity in strength and rehabilitation practice but lacks empirical characterization. Whether it elicits different posterior-chain activation than the Romanian deadlift (RDL), a well-documented hip-hinge exercise, at a matched submaximal load is unknown. Hypothesis/Purpose: To characterize erector spinae activation during the Jefferson curl at a submaximal load and test the hypothesis that, at the same absolute load, the Jefferson curl elicits greater erector spinae activation than the RDL; and to describe gluteus maximus and biceps femoris activation without a directional hypothesis.Study design Cross-sectional observational study.Methods Twenty-one resistance-trained adults performed five repetitions of the Jefferson curl and of the RDL on a 30-cm platform. Load was adjusted to a Borg RPE of 16 during the Jefferson curl, and the same absolute load was used for the RDL. Surface EMG was recorded from the upper, middle, and lower erector spinae, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris bilaterally and normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC). Left and right values were averaged. A linear mixed-effects model with exercise*muscle fixed effects and participant as a random intercept was used. Benjamini-Hochberg procedure controlled the false discovery rate.Results The Jefferson curl elicited higher mean activation than the RDL in the upper erector spinae (62.84 vs 44.52 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.003, Hedges' g=0.83), lower erector spinae (60.07 vs 47.85 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.035, g=0.49), and biceps femoris (54.18 vs 41.54 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.035, g=0.60). The middle erector spinae and gluteus maximus activation did not differ significantly (adjusted p≥0.45).Conclusion In resistance-trained adults, the Jefferson curl at a submaximal load produced greater upper- and lower-erector spinae and biceps femoris activation than the RDL at the same absolute load. The Jefferson curl can be considered when designing targeted recruitment of the erector spinae and hamstrings through controlled spinal flexion.Level of evidence 3.
SN - 2159-2896
ER -