Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDEnvironmental monitoring and assessment

Operational comparability of ecological status assessment in Iberian transboundary rivers.

  • António Tovar Faro1
  • João Manuel Oliveira2,3,4
  • Gonçalo Duarte5
  • Paulo Branco5
  • Pedro Segurado5
  • Teresa Ferreira5
5 affiliations
  1. 1Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected].
  2. 2Santarém Polytechnic University, School of Agriculture, Quinta Do Galinheiro-S. Pedro, Santarém, 2001-904, Portugal.
  3. 3Research Center in Natural Resources, Environment and Society (CERNAS), Santarém Polytechnic University, 2001-904, Quinta Do Galinheiro-S. Pedro, Portugal.
  4. 4cE3c-Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE-Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
  5. 5Forest Research Centre, TERRA Associate Laboratory, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1349-017, Portugal.
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

The European Union Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires member states to assess the ecological status of surface waters using biological quality elements (BQEs). Although the WFD includes intercalibration procedures to harmonise class boundaries, differences between national assessment systems may affect the comparability of ecological status classifications, particularly in transboundary rivers. This study evaluated the consistency of Portuguese and Spanish ecological status assessments in 32 water bodies across Iberian transboundary rivers in the Minho, Lima, Douro, Tagus and Guadiana basins, using data collected between 2019 and 2021. Comparisons included fish, macrophytes, benthic macroinvertebrates and diatoms. Biological assemblages, ecological quality ratios (EQRs) and ecological quality classifications were analysed. Results differed markedly among BQEs. Fish showed no significant differences in assemblage composition or EQR values between countries and a moderate positive correlation in ecological quality classifications. Macroinvertebrates displayed weak compositional separation, no differences in EQR values and a weak, nonsignificant positive correlation between countries. Macrophytes showed significant compositional differences despite similar EQR distributions and a weak, nonsignificant positive correlation in ecological quality classifications. Diatoms showed the strongest divergence, with clear assemblage separation, higher EQR values in Spain and a very weak, nonsignificant negative correlation between countries. Final ecological classifications also showed a weak, nonsignificant positive correlation between countries. These findings show that formal intercalibration alone does not guarantee operational comparability in shared river systems. Cross-border assessment consistency depends strongly on the BQEs considered and on methodological differences between national monitoring systems, highlighting the need for improved harmonisation of monitoring procedures and taxonomic practices.

Related

  1. Standardizing freshwater macroinvertebrate taxonomy: a Lithuanian operational taxa list for ecological quality assessments and biodiversity research.
    Diana Osadčaja, Giedrė Višinskienė, Sabina Solovjova +2
    Environmental monitoring and assessmentPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEcologyEurope PMC
  2. Associations between social network characteristics and daily social experiences in later life: evidence from ecological momentary assessment
    Brea L Perry, Tianyao Qu, Siyun Peng +1
    The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social SciencesPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text1 citedNeurosciencePMC
  3. Investigating the dynamic relationship between anxiety and spatial memory using autonomous ecological momentary assessment
    C. Z. Han, K. C. Zhao, L. M. Wang +12
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Matching laboratory and real-world listening environments with ecological momentary assessment improves prediction of speech perception.
    Erik Jorgensen, Megan Werner, Autumn Grove +1
    JASA express lettersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  5. Calculation and application of the selenium toxicity coefficient for potential ecological risk assessment
    Xintian Wen, Yanjin Huang
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEvolutionary biologyPLOS

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{faro2026operational,
  title = {{Operational comparability of ecological status assessment in Iberian transboundary rivers.}},
  author = {António Tovar Faro and João Manuel Oliveira and Gonçalo Duarte and Paulo Branco and Pedro Segurado and Teresa Ferreira},
  journal = {Environmental monitoring and assessment},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s10661-026-16021-6},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897373},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Operational comparability of ecological status assessment in Iberian transboundary rivers.
AU  - António Tovar Faro
AU  - João Manuel Oliveira
AU  - Gonçalo Duarte
AU  - Paulo Branco
AU  - Pedro Segurado
AU  - Teresa Ferreira
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - Environmental monitoring and assessment
DO  - 10.1007/s10661-026-16021-6
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897373
AB  - The European Union Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires member states to assess the ecological status of surface waters using biological quality elements (BQEs). Although the WFD includes intercalibration procedures to harmonise class boundaries, differences between national assessment systems may affect the comparability of ecological status classifications, particularly in transboundary rivers. This study evaluated the consistency of Portuguese and Spanish ecological status assessments in 32 water bodies across Iberian transboundary rivers in the Minho, Lima, Douro, Tagus and Guadiana basins, using data collected between 2019 and 2021. Comparisons included fish, macrophytes, benthic macroinvertebrates and diatoms. Biological assemblages, ecological quality ratios (EQRs) and ecological quality classifications were analysed. Results differed markedly among BQEs. Fish showed no significant differences in assemblage composition or EQR values between countries and a moderate positive correlation in ecological quality classifications. Macroinvertebrates displayed weak compositional separation, no differences in EQR values and a weak, nonsignificant positive correlation between countries. Macrophytes showed significant compositional differences despite similar EQR distributions and a weak, nonsignificant positive correlation in ecological quality classifications. Diatoms showed the strongest divergence, with clear assemblage separation, higher EQR values in Spain and a very weak, nonsignificant negative correlation between countries. Final ecological classifications also showed a weak, nonsignificant positive correlation between countries. These findings show that formal intercalibration alone does not guarantee operational comparability in shared river systems. Cross-border assessment consistency depends strongly on the BQEs considered and on methodological differences between national monitoring systems, highlighting the need for improved harmonisation of monitoring procedures and taxonomic practices.
SN  - 0167-6369
SN  - 1573-2959
ER  -