Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Exact T-counts of CCZ layers from an isotropy bound

Abstract

The T-count is a dominant cost of fault-tolerant Clifford+T computation. We prove that every Hadamard-free Clifford+T circuit with clean ancillas for a layer of m disjoint CCZ gates, the diagonal core of a parallel Toffoli layer, uses at least 6m+1 T gates. Campbell and Howard gave a circuit with 6m+1, and to our knowledge this is the first proof that it is optimal for general m. The proof combines Campbell and Howard's self-orthogonality of the columns of the parity matrix with a rank (flattening) bound, sharpened by one. More generally, the argument gives a lower bound on the T-count of every diagonal gate in the third level of the Clifford hierarchy, the isotropy floor, computable by Gaussian elimination. It is never below the stabilizer nullity ν and reaches 2ν+1 on non-Clifford gates whose phase is purely cubic. No bound that also holds for circuits with measurement and feedforward can do this, since such circuits implement CCZ (ν=3) with four T gates and the layer with 4m, where the floor gives seven and 6m+1. The floor also recovers Campbell and Howard's count 4m+3 for a fan-out of Toffolis. On the output of PyZX's TODD-based optimizer, relative to its Hadamard placement, it certifies $193$ of $311$ phase-polynomial blocks T-optimal once repeated parities are merged (at the best of five optimizer seeds), against $113$ for nullity, including $37$ of the $72$ blocks too large for exhaustive search.

Related

  1. [Depreciated and replaced by V3] No Dice: Deterministic Interference, Exact Branch Counts, and Quantum Measurement from the Fold
    Maria Smith
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Peer-reviewedCC BY7 citedAtomic, molecular & optical physicsOpenAlex
  2. Mapping-based exact-integral formulation of skin-friction transformations for zero-pressure-gradient compressible turbulent boundary layers
    Xuke Zhu, Xiaoshuo Yang, Yongchao Ji +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  3. Unitary-accessible coherence-erasure distance: Exact qubit solution and a tight qutrit bound
    Dong-Ping Xuan, Hua Nan, Zhi-Xi Wang +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Exact Characterization of the Holevo Bound by a Quantum Fisher Information Family
    Koji Yamaguchi, Hiroyasu Tajima
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. An exact computer-assisted lower bound for Fisher-information convexity along the two-dimensional heat flow
    Fayez Abu-Ajamieh, Xiaoyan Huo
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mazumder2026exact,
  title = {{Exact $T$-counts of CCZ layers from an isotropy bound}},
  author = {Arul Rhik Mazumder},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.01024},
  eprint = {2610.01024},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01024},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Exact T-counts of CCZ layers from an isotropy bound
AU  - Arul Rhik Mazumder
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.01024
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01024
AB  - The T-count is a dominant cost of fault-tolerant Clifford+T computation. We prove that every Hadamard-free Clifford+T circuit with clean ancillas for a layer of m disjoint CCZ gates, the diagonal core of a parallel Toffoli layer, uses at least 6m+1 T gates. Campbell and Howard gave a circuit with 6m+1, and to our knowledge this is the first proof that it is optimal for general m. The proof combines Campbell and Howard's self-orthogonality of the columns of the parity matrix with a rank (flattening) bound, sharpened by one. More generally, the argument gives a lower bound on the T-count of every diagonal gate in the third level of the Clifford hierarchy, the isotropy floor, computable by Gaussian elimination. It is never below the stabilizer nullity ν and reaches 2ν+1 on non-Clifford gates whose phase is purely cubic. No bound that also holds for circuits with measurement and feedforward can do this, since such circuits implement CCZ (ν=3) with four T gates and the layer with 4m, where the floor gives seven and 6m+1. The floor also recovers Campbell and Howard's count 4m+3 for a fan-out of Toffolis. On the output of PyZX's TODD-based optimizer, relative to its Hadamard placement, it certifies $193$ of $311$ phase-polynomial blocks T-optimal once repeated parities are merged (at the best of five optimizer seeds), against $113$ for nullity, including $37$ of the $72$ blocks too large for exhaustive search.
ER  -