Identifying Panel Conditioning with Refreshment Samples: Sharp Bounds and Design Assumptions
Abstract
Refreshment samples are the standard remedy for panel attrition, and the identification results behind them maintain that participation does not change measurement. We characterize what a refreshment sample identifies about panel conditioning, modelled as a deterministic monotone map at reinterview, when attrition is unrestricted. A candidate map is consistent with the data if and only if the retention-scaled distribution of the stayers' implied latent outcomes is setwise dominated by the refreshment distribution; every such map is rationalized by an explicit attrition process. Without attrition the map is identified on the latent-outcome support; with attrition, a density-ratio condition governs the identified set, and tail behaviour alone does not determine it. For an unrestricted map the survivors' mean effect has the familiar trimming bounds; for an item with all categories reported, the model reduces to a test of no conditioning. Within a cohort, other waves, dropout patterns and entry-wave items leave the set unchanged unless restrictions link selection across waves. Under explicit selection restrictions, survival matching, symmetric matching and entry-wave correction identify survivor effects. We derive their biases and give rank conditions under which refreshment schedules identify curvature in the conditioning path. A Japanese panel illustrates the results.
Related
- Towards more plausible point-identifying assumptions in two-sample Mendelian randomization
- Tight Bounds for Equivalence Testing with Non-Adaptive Conditional Samples
- Exploiting Exact Conditionals Improves Conditioning: Provably Fast Mixing Time Bounds By Sampling from the Marginal
- Conditioning and interpolation error bounds for second-order Stiefel retractions with closed-form inverses
- How Many Independent Samples Does a Satellite Image Contain? Generalization Bounds for Spatially Dependent Data
BibTeX
@misc{okubo2026identifying,
title = {{Identifying Panel Conditioning with Refreshment Samples: Sharp Bounds and Design Assumptions}},
author = {Shoki Okubo},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.01654},
eprint = {2610.01654},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01654},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Identifying Panel Conditioning with Refreshment Samples: Sharp Bounds and Design Assumptions
AU - Shoki Okubo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.01654
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01654
AB - Refreshment samples are the standard remedy for panel attrition, and the identification results behind them maintain that participation does not change measurement. We characterize what a refreshment sample identifies about panel conditioning, modelled as a deterministic monotone map at reinterview, when attrition is unrestricted. A candidate map is consistent with the data if and only if the retention-scaled distribution of the stayers' implied latent outcomes is setwise dominated by the refreshment distribution; every such map is rationalized by an explicit attrition process. Without attrition the map is identified on the latent-outcome support; with attrition, a density-ratio condition governs the identified set, and tail behaviour alone does not determine it. For an unrestricted map the survivors' mean effect has the familiar trimming bounds; for an item with all categories reported, the model reduces to a test of no conditioning. Within a cohort, other waves, dropout patterns and entry-wave items leave the set unchanged unless restrictions link selection across waves. Under explicit selection restrictions, survival matching, symmetric matching and entry-wave correction identify survivor effects. We derive their biases and give rank conditions under which refreshment schedules identify curvature in the conditioning path. A Japanese panel illustrates the results.
ER -