Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
206,690 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Functional Analysis of Widefield Radio Interferometry

Abstract

Radio interferometry relies on reconstruction techniques to form images from discrete visibility measurements. As instruments encompass wider fields of view, the nuance of that reconstruction can lead to geometrical errors in the image. As a result, the estimation of the flux density of sources can change. We derive the full functional analysis of widefield radio interferometry to provide a foundation for investigating geometry-based errors. We use this framework to investigate three examples: 1) deconvolution errors resulting from a minor iteration, 2) gridding errors resulting from excluding primary beam sidelobes, and 3) w-term errors resulting from omitting the non-coplanar dimension on a 2 min near-zenith transit. We use their adjoint operator descriptions to simulate each of the three cases for two fields using the Murchison Widefield Array. While the estimated errors on the flux density of reconstructed sources are small, overall errors depend on the field observed. For our two fields, we find fractional flux density errors up to 5% due to deconvolution, 0.1% due to gridding, and 10% due to non-coplanarity. Our operator formalism can be used to investigate many other forms of image reconstruction errors.

Related

  1. Inferring radio beams from sparse sampling patterns: a case study with the Murchison Widefield Array
    Michael J. Wilensky, Aman Chokshi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  2. VROOM-SBI: A Fast Simulation-Based Bayesian Inference Methodology for Stokes QU-Fitting in Radio Interferometry
    Arpan Pal, Preshanth Jagannathan
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  3. The Peculiar Astrometric Behaviour and Radio Structure of the Quasar 1524-136 Revealed with Very Long Baseline Interferometry
    Angelina Osetrova, Sándor Frey, Oleg Titov +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGalaxiesarXiv
  4. Options for Compression of radio interferometry data: lossy compression of visibilities and lossless compression of uv-visibility grids for the MHONGOOSE survey
    Richard Dodson, Jonghwan Rhee, W. J. G. de Blok +6
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  5. Accurate dynamical mass and orbit determination of the M dwarf binary DG CVn using astrometric very long baseline interferometry
    E. Paul Boven, Huib Jan van Langevelde, Geoffrey Bower +3
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{barry2026functional,
  title = {{Functional Analysis of Widefield Radio Interferometry}},
  author = {Nichole Barry and Jaiden Cook and Cathryn Trott and Tiasha Biswas and Nazeef},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.22752},
  eprint = {2610.22752},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22752},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Functional Analysis of Widefield Radio Interferometry
AU  - Nichole Barry
AU  - Jaiden Cook
AU  - Cathryn Trott
AU  - Tiasha Biswas
AU  - Nazeef
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.22752
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22752
AB  - Radio interferometry relies on reconstruction techniques to form images from discrete visibility measurements. As instruments encompass wider fields of view, the nuance of that reconstruction can lead to geometrical errors in the image. As a result, the estimation of the flux density of sources can change. We derive the full functional analysis of widefield radio interferometry to provide a foundation for investigating geometry-based errors. We use this framework to investigate three examples: 1) deconvolution errors resulting from a minor iteration, 2) gridding errors resulting from excluding primary beam sidelobes, and 3) w-term errors resulting from omitting the non-coplanar dimension on a 2 min near-zenith transit. We use their adjoint operator descriptions to simulate each of the three cases for two fields using the Murchison Widefield Array. While the estimated errors on the flux density of reconstructed sources are small, overall errors depend on the field observed. For our two fields, we find fractional flux density errors up to 5% due to deconvolution, 0.1% due to gridding, and 10% due to non-coplanarity. Our operator formalism can be used to investigate many other forms of image reconstruction errors.
ER  -