Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Frequentist prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis via confidence-distribution propagation

Abstract

Prediction intervals are increasingly recommended in random-effects meta-analysis because they describe the range of true effects expected in a future study or setting. Conventional frequentist intervals can have inadequate finite-sample coverage because uncertainty in the between-study variance is not fully propagated. We propose a confidence-distribution propagation method that carries uncertainty through the random-effects hierarchy. The method samples the between-study variance from a confidence distribution obtained by inverting the exact distribution of Cochran's Q and, conditional on each draw, samples the average effect from its corresponding normal confidence distribution before generating a future true effect. Prediction limits are empirical quantiles of the resulting Monte Carlo distribution. Across the scenarios examined, the proposed method improved or maintained coverage relative to existing frequentist intervals, including the Nagashima-Noma-Furukawa confidence-distribution bootstrap, with generally modest increases in expected width. The same Monte Carlo sample also yields confidence intervals for the average effect and heterogeneity measures. The method is implemented in the R package cdmeta available at CRAN (https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.cdmeta).

Related

  1. Confidence Intervals Based on the Modified Chi-Squared Distribution and Its Applications in Medicine
    Mulan Wu, Mengyu Xu, Dong-yun Kim
    Journal of statistical theory and practicePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textStatisticsPMC
  2. Adaptive confidence intervals with missing data
    Tianyi Ma, Kabir A. Verchand, Chao Gao +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Changepoint localization via nested exchangeability tests: from point estimates to confidence intervals
    Rohan Hore, Aaditya Ramdas
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Sub-Gaussian Confidence Intervals for Heavy-Tailed Data: Characterizing the Limits of Inference
    Ilyes Hammouda, Stanislav Minsker, Mohamed Ndaoud
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Differentially Private Confidence Intervals for Relative Risk and Odds Ratio
    Tomer Shoham, Katrina Ligett
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{noma2026frequentist,
  title = {{Frequentist prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis via confidence-distribution propagation}},
  author = {Hisashi Noma and Guido Schwarzer},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.26527},
  eprint = {2608.26527},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26527},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Frequentist prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis via confidence-distribution propagation
AU  - Hisashi Noma
AU  - Guido Schwarzer
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.26527
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26527
AB  - Prediction intervals are increasingly recommended in random-effects meta-analysis because they describe the range of true effects expected in a future study or setting. Conventional frequentist intervals can have inadequate finite-sample coverage because uncertainty in the between-study variance is not fully propagated. We propose a confidence-distribution propagation method that carries uncertainty through the random-effects hierarchy. The method samples the between-study variance from a confidence distribution obtained by inverting the exact distribution of Cochran's Q and, conditional on each draw, samples the average effect from its corresponding normal confidence distribution before generating a future true effect. Prediction limits are empirical quantiles of the resulting Monte Carlo distribution. Across the scenarios examined, the proposed method improved or maintained coverage relative to existing frequentist intervals, including the Nagashima-Noma-Furukawa confidence-distribution bootstrap, with generally modest increases in expected width. The same Monte Carlo sample also yields confidence intervals for the average effect and heterogeneity measures. The method is implemented in the R package cdmeta available at CRAN (https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.cdmeta).
ER  -