Chlorhexidine Versus Iodine-Based Skin Preparation Was Not Associated with a Significant Difference in 90-Day Infection Risk After Instrumented Degenerative Cervical or Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 1 Kettle Point Avenue, East Providence, RI 02914, USA
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Chlorhexidine and iodine-based preparations are both widely used, and the existing literature suggests a possible advantage of chlorhexidine in clean elective surgery. Whether this extends to instrumented degenerative spine surgery is unknown. We asked whether chlorhexidine-based skin preparation reduces 90-day postoperative infection compared with iodine-based preparation after instrumented degenerative cervical or lumbar spine surgery. Methods: A retrospective TriNetX cohort study was performed among adults undergoing instrumented degenerative cervical or lumbar spine surgery. Patients were stratified by anatomic region and by preoperative preparation exposure: chlorhexidine-based versus iodine-based. Moreover, 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed within each anatomic stratum on demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), diabetes, smoking, obesity and BMI, immunosuppression, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier status, and index procedure codes. The primary outcome was 90-day postoperative infection. Secondary outcomes were superficial and deep surgical site infection, MRSA infection, incision and drainage, debridement, sepsis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia. Results: After matching, the cervical cohort included 3528 patients per group and the lumbar cohort 4164 per group. Postoperative infection did not differ in the cervical cohort (1.76% vs. 1.59%; risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–1.58; p = 0.578) or the lumbar cohort (3.17% vs. 3.29%; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76–1.22; p = 0.757). Superficial and deep infection, MRSA infection, debridement, sepsis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia did not differ significantly in either cohort. Conclusions: No statistically significant difference in 90-day postoperative infection was found between chlorhexidine-based and iodine-based skin preparation after instrumented degenerative cervical or lumbar spine surgery.
Related
- Efficacy of chlorhexidine vaginal preparation in reducing postoperative infections during emergency cesarean deliveries for women in labor: a randomized controlled trial
- Impact of chlorhexidine gluconate on periurethral cleansing on catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a before-and-after quasi-experimental study at a tertiary care hospital.
- Chlorhexidine within a standardized oral-care bundle for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a pragmatic cluster-randomized crossover trial in six medical intensive care units.
- Factors associated with significant fibrosis and MASH in a diabetic Caribbean population of the French West Indies
- Factors associated with significant liver fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a single-center retrospective study
BibTeX
@article{batrash2026chlorhexidine,
title = {{Chlorhexidine Versus Iodine-Based Skin Preparation Was Not Associated with a Significant Difference in 90-Day Infection Risk After Instrumented Degenerative Cervical or Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis}},
author = {Firas Batrash and Fahad Jamal and Siddharth Jasti and James A. Belanger and Timothy A. Reiad and Tasif Mahmoud and Ahmed Iqbal and Artin Allahverdian and Bassel G. Diebo and Bryce A. Basques and Alan H. Daniels},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15197714},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/19/7714},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Chlorhexidine Versus Iodine-Based Skin Preparation Was Not Associated with a Significant Difference in 90-Day Infection Risk After Instrumented Degenerative Cervical or Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
AU - Firas Batrash
AU - Fahad Jamal
AU - Siddharth Jasti
AU - James A. Belanger
AU - Timothy A. Reiad
AU - Tasif Mahmoud
AU - Ahmed Iqbal
AU - Artin Allahverdian
AU - Bassel G. Diebo
AU - Bryce A. Basques
AU - Alan H. Daniels
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15197714
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/19/7714
AB - Background/Objectives: Chlorhexidine and iodine-based preparations are both widely used, and the existing literature suggests a possible advantage of chlorhexidine in clean elective surgery. Whether this extends to instrumented degenerative spine surgery is unknown. We asked whether chlorhexidine-based skin preparation reduces 90-day postoperative infection compared with iodine-based preparation after instrumented degenerative cervical or lumbar spine surgery. Methods: A retrospective TriNetX cohort study was performed among adults undergoing instrumented degenerative cervical or lumbar spine surgery. Patients were stratified by anatomic region and by preoperative preparation exposure: chlorhexidine-based versus iodine-based. Moreover, 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed within each anatomic stratum on demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), diabetes, smoking, obesity and BMI, immunosuppression, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier status, and index procedure codes. The primary outcome was 90-day postoperative infection. Secondary outcomes were superficial and deep surgical site infection, MRSA infection, incision and drainage, debridement, sepsis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia. Results: After matching, the cervical cohort included 3528 patients per group and the lumbar cohort 4164 per group. Postoperative infection did not differ in the cervical cohort (1.76% vs. 1.59%; risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–1.58; p = 0.578) or the lumbar cohort (3.17% vs. 3.29%; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76–1.22; p = 0.757). Superficial and deep infection, MRSA infection, debridement, sepsis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia did not differ significantly in either cohort. Conclusions: No statistically significant difference in 90-day postoperative infection was found between chlorhexidine-based and iodine-based skin preparation after instrumented degenerative cervical or lumbar spine surgery.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -