Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

The impact of secondary school closures on pandemic control: a systematic literature review

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, secondary schools (∼ages 11-19) were closed for a substantial time, causing educational disruption and widening socio-economic inequalities. Clear evidence on the transmission impact of secondary school closures is essential to inform future pandemic policymaking, yet remains limited. There are two issues: analyses often do not disaggregate primary and secondary education, despite differences in contact patterns and transmission potential; and closures coincided with other public health measures, complicating causal attribution. We synthesized evidence on the population-level impact of secondary school closures on transmission, and considered how studies attempted to isolate this effect. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Five databases were searched in March 2025 for school closure/reopening and SARS-CoV-2/influenza. Title/abstract screening combined manual review (Covidence) with machine-assisted screening (ASReview). Full-text screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were completed in Covidence. Eligible studies quantified changes in population-level transmission associated with secondary school closure/reopening. Of 6,334 records identified, 23 studies were included. Many were excluded for not distinguishing secondary schools (or ages 11-19) from other school settings. Included studies showed heterogeneity in outcome measures and contextual factors. Nineteen studies addressed SARS-CoV-2 and four influenza. Findings were varied: some studies reported transmission reductions following closures or increases after reopening, while others found minimal effects on transmission. The utility of existing COVID-19 literature is limited when school settings are not clearly defined. Because adolescents and children differ in contact patterns, age- or school-level disaggregation is needed for valid inference. This review strengthens the evidence base for more informed decision-making in future pandemics.

Key messages: • Clear evidence on the population-level impact of secondary school closures on respiratory viruses is limited and methodologically heterogeneous, due to poor school-level disaggregation.

• Better age- or school-specific definitions are needed to improve causal attribution and strengthen the evidence base for infectious disease control policies in future pandemics.

Related

  1. The role of big data analytics in financial fraud detection: A systematic literature review
    Dedik Nur Triyanto, Syaiful Ali
    International Review of Economics & FinancePeer-reviewedCC BY6 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  2. Governing Agentic AI in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review of Ethical Challenges, Framework Gaps, and Ubuntu-Informed Governance Solutions
    Tope Samuel Adeyelure
    Journal of Information Systems and InformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  3. Hierarchical Cognitive Structuring and Game Mechanics Alignment in Educational Game Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
    Umi Rosyidah, Purwanto, Putri Taqwa Prasetyaningrum
    Journal of Information Systems and InformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  4. Graph-Enhanced Knowledge Tracing for Explainable Learner Modeling: A Systematic Literature Review
    Nurfaizah, R Rizal Isnanto, Imam Tahyudin
    Journal of Information Systems and InformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  5. Mapping E-Readiness Dimensions for Digital Village Development: A Systematic Literature and Bibliometric Review
    Yenni Fatman, Catur Edi Widodo, Dinar Mutiara Kusumo Nugraheni
    Journal of Information Systems and InformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{eck2026impact,
  title = {{The impact of secondary school closures on pandemic control: a systematic literature review}},
  author = {L C Van Eck and T Florschütz and C M De Korne and PCJL Bruijning-Verhagen and AJM Schreijer},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1645},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1645},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The impact of secondary school closures on pandemic control: a systematic literature review
AU  - L C Van Eck
AU  - T Florschütz
AU  - C M De Korne
AU  - PCJL Bruijning-Verhagen
AU  - AJM Schreijer
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1645
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1645
AB  - During the COVID-19 pandemic, secondary schools (∼ages 11-19) were closed for a substantial time, causing educational disruption and widening socio-economic inequalities. Clear evidence on the transmission impact of secondary school closures is essential to inform future pandemic policymaking, yet remains limited. There are two issues: analyses often do not disaggregate primary and secondary education, despite differences in contact patterns and transmission potential; and closures coincided with other public health measures, complicating causal attribution. We synthesized evidence on the population-level impact of secondary school closures on transmission, and considered how studies attempted to isolate this effect. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Five databases were searched in March 2025 for school closure/reopening and SARS-CoV-2/influenza. Title/abstract screening combined manual review (Covidence) with machine-assisted screening (ASReview). Full-text screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were completed in Covidence. Eligible studies quantified changes in population-level transmission associated with secondary school closure/reopening. Of 6,334 records identified, 23 studies were included. Many were excluded for not distinguishing secondary schools (or ages 11-19) from other school settings. Included studies showed heterogeneity in outcome measures and contextual factors. Nineteen studies addressed SARS-CoV-2 and four influenza. Findings were varied: some studies reported transmission reductions following closures or increases after reopening, while others found minimal effects on transmission. The utility of existing COVID-19 literature is limited when school settings are not clearly defined. Because adolescents and children differ in contact patterns, age- or school-level disaggregation is needed for valid inference. This review strengthens the evidence base for more informed decision-making in future pandemics.  Key messages: • Clear evidence on the population-level impact of secondary school closures on respiratory viruses is limited and methodologically heterogeneous, due to poor school-level disaggregation.  • Better age- or school-specific definitions are needed to improve causal attribution and strengthen the evidence base for infectious disease control policies in future pandemics.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -