Joint inference for gravitational-wave signal and noise glitch: Method and application
Abstract
Non-Gaussian noise transients ("glitches") in gravitational-wave observatories degrade our ability to accurately perform astrophysical inference. We present the analysis pipeline bilby_glitch, which allows for simultaneous Bayesian inference of gravitational-wave signals and glitches. Our framework is modular and built on top of the popular bilby framework, facilitating future extensions with additional glitch and signal models. We integrate transdimensional bilby into our framework and discuss three glitch models: a physically-motivated slow scattering model, and flexible sine-Gaussian and chirplet models. Using a combination of simulated and real data, we demonstrate that bilby_glitch produces reliable results. We then reanalyse two gravitational-wave events - GW191109 and GW200129 - which show signs of interesting black-hole spins, but which may also be affected by data-quality issues. Our results for GW191109 are consistent with previous analysis. For GW200129, we recover results consistent with [Payne et al., Phys. Rev. D 106, 104017 (2022) ], where the evidence of spin-precession is much weaker when using the waveform approximant NRSur7dq4 in combination with wavelet-based glitch modeling. Furthermore, we show the evidence of spin precession of this event is dependent on the interplay between the waveform approximant and glitch model, since in contrast to NRSur7dq4 we find that inference with the waveform approximant IMRPhenomXPHM shows strong evidence of spin-precession when used in combination with wavelet-based glitch modeling.
Related
- Analytic Marginalization Over Calibration Uncertainties in Gravitational Wave Inference and Application to Black Hole Ringdown
- Fisher Information Velocity: A New Geometric Channel for Precision Glitch Identification in Gravitational-Wave Detectors
- Reduced Gravitational Wave Signal Reopens the Ultralight Primordial Black Hole Window
- Photonic-Based Adaptive Spectrum Analysis of RF Signals. Application to Signal Detection by Generalized Time-Frequency Filtering
- Deterministic denoising of long-duration gravitational-wave signal candidates with α-(de)blending
BibTeX
@misc{cheung2026joint,
title = {{Joint inference for gravitational-wave signal and noise glitch: Method and application}},
author = {Shun Yin Cheung and Rhiannon Udall and Derek Davis and Paul D. Lasky and Eric Thrane},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.09111},
eprint = {2607.09111},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09111},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Joint inference for gravitational-wave signal and noise glitch: Method and application
AU - Shun Yin Cheung
AU - Rhiannon Udall
AU - Derek Davis
AU - Paul D. Lasky
AU - Eric Thrane
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.09111
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09111
AB - Non-Gaussian noise transients ("glitches") in gravitational-wave observatories degrade our ability to accurately perform astrophysical inference. We present the analysis pipeline bilby_glitch, which allows for simultaneous Bayesian inference of gravitational-wave signals and glitches. Our framework is modular and built on top of the popular bilby framework, facilitating future extensions with additional glitch and signal models. We integrate transdimensional bilby into our framework and discuss three glitch models: a physically-motivated slow scattering model, and flexible sine-Gaussian and chirplet models. Using a combination of simulated and real data, we demonstrate that bilby_glitch produces reliable results. We then reanalyse two gravitational-wave events - GW191109 and GW200129 - which show signs of interesting black-hole spins, but which may also be affected by data-quality issues. Our results for GW191109 are consistent with previous analysis. For GW200129, we recover results consistent with [Payne et al., Phys. Rev. D 106, 104017 (2022) ], where the evidence of spin-precession is much weaker when using the waveform approximant NRSur7dq4 in combination with wavelet-based glitch modeling. Furthermore, we show the evidence of spin precession of this event is dependent on the interplay between the waveform approximant and glitch model, since in contrast to NRSur7dq4 we find that inference with the waveform approximant IMRPhenomXPHM shows strong evidence of spin-precession when used in combination with wavelet-based glitch modeling.
ER -