Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

Cytology, High-Risk HPV Genotyping, and Histology in Cervical Pathology: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Doctoral School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
  2. 2Department I of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
  3. 3Department of Clinical Practical Skills, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
  4. 4Department XII, Obstetrics-Gynecology I, Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer prevention relies on cytology, high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing, and histological confirmation, but these modalities may disagree. We quantified test concordance and determinants of CIN2+ in a specialized gynecologic referral cohort with very low HPV vaccination coverage. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 172 women evaluated for suspected or established cervical pathology between 2022 and 2024. Of these, 160 had a definitive HPV result and 130 had histology; histology-based performance analyses used complete cases and are conditional on biopsy verification. Cytology was categorized by the Bethesda system, HR-HPV genotypes were recorded, and histology was dichotomized as CIN2+ versus ≤CIN1. Results: Among 160 women with definitive HPV results, 109 (68.1%) were HPV-positive. HPV-positive women were younger (median 33 vs. 43 years, p < 0.001) and, among biopsied women, more frequently had CIN2+ (70.2% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.001). Cyto-histological agreement was fair (65.0%, κ = 0.32). HPV16/18 was strongly associated with CIN2+ (OR 6.85, 95% CI 2.54-18.49). Within histologically verified complete cases, HPV DNA positivity had the highest apparent sensitivity (91.7%), whereas HPV16/18 had the highest PPV (86.0%). Conclusions: Cytology and HR-HPV testing provide complementary information in this referral-enriched cohort. Because disease prevalence was high and biopsy verification was selective, predictive values and apparent diagnostic-performance estimates should not be extrapolated directly to population screening; external validation in primary-screening populations is required.

Related

  1. CERVEX: A Foundation-Model Framework With Built-In Explainable AI for Automated Cervical Cytology Classification From Pap Smear Images
    N. Sriratana, P. Pongsiripreeda, P. Uasawaengboon +2
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  2. Prevalence and predictors of abnormal cervical cytology among women living with HIV and without HIV from the MACS/WIHS combined cohort study
    Dominique Guillaume, Sarah Olson, Jodie A Dionne +9
    Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  3. CytoLens: a modular deep learning system for quantitative cervical cytology
    K. Lee, R. J. Yoon, R. S. Lee +1
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  4. Combined plasma and liquid-based cytology microRNA signatures as biomarkers of high-grade cervical lesions: association with HPV infection and p16 expression.
    Tabinda Hasan, Huda Eltayeb, Amal N Alanazi +3
    The journal of liquid biopsyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. A study of epithelial cell abnormalities of cervical cytology by Bethesda categorization with histopathological correlation in a rural tertiary care hospital – An institutional experience
    Govindasamy Revathi, Subramanian Kalaivani Selvi, Saravanan Srivani +1
    Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{mazilu2026cytology,
  title = {{Cytology, High-Risk HPV Genotyping, and Histology in Cervical Pathology: A Retrospective Cohort Study.}},
  author = {Maria-Daniela Vasieș Mazilu and Elena-Lavinia Rusu and Jasmina-Sorina Chiriac and Alexandra-Corina Faur and Elena-Rodica Heredea and Veronica-Daniela Chiriac},
  journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16193204},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882358},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cytology, High-Risk HPV Genotyping, and Histology in Cervical Pathology: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
AU  - Maria-Daniela Vasieș Mazilu
AU  - Elena-Lavinia Rusu
AU  - Jasmina-Sorina Chiriac
AU  - Alexandra-Corina Faur
AU  - Elena-Rodica Heredea
AU  - Veronica-Daniela Chiriac
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/diagnostics16193204
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882358
AB  - Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer prevention relies on cytology, high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing, and histological confirmation, but these modalities may disagree. We quantified test concordance and determinants of CIN2+ in a specialized gynecologic referral cohort with very low HPV vaccination coverage. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 172 women evaluated for suspected or established cervical pathology between 2022 and 2024. Of these, 160 had a definitive HPV result and 130 had histology; histology-based performance analyses used complete cases and are conditional on biopsy verification. Cytology was categorized by the Bethesda system, HR-HPV genotypes were recorded, and histology was dichotomized as CIN2+ versus ≤CIN1. Results: Among 160 women with definitive HPV results, 109 (68.1%) were HPV-positive. HPV-positive women were younger (median 33 vs. 43 years, p < 0.001) and, among biopsied women, more frequently had CIN2+ (70.2% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.001). Cyto-histological agreement was fair (65.0%, κ = 0.32). HPV16/18 was strongly associated with CIN2+ (OR 6.85, 95% CI 2.54-18.49). Within histologically verified complete cases, HPV DNA positivity had the highest apparent sensitivity (91.7%), whereas HPV16/18 had the highest PPV (86.0%). Conclusions: Cytology and HR-HPV testing provide complementary information in this referral-enriched cohort. Because disease prevalence was high and biopsy verification was selective, predictive values and apparent diagnostic-performance estimates should not be extrapolated directly to population screening; external validation in primary-screening populations is required.
SN  - 2075-4418
ER  -