Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Development and validation of dysphagia knowledge and self-reported competence questionnaire for nurses

4 affiliations
  1. 1Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Science, Riphah InternationalUniversity, Islamabad, Pakistan
  2. 2Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
  3. 3Department of Speech Pathology, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  4. 4National Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Islamabad, Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Dysphagia is a common condition across healthcare settings and is associated with serious complications. Nurses play a key role in early identification and safe management. However, substantial gaps exist in nurses’ knowledge and competence. The scope of existing dysphagia questionnaires is limited, and most are designed for specialised populations. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive tool to assess nurses’ knowledge and perceived competence in dysphagia care. Methods: The Dysphagia Knowledge and Self-reported Competence Questionnaire for Nurses (DKSCQ-N) was developed and validated in two phases. Phase 1 included item generation through literature review, mapping items across six domains, and expert evaluation using a Table of Specification and the Content Validity Index. Cognitive interviews with nurses were conducted to assess clarity, relevance and usability. In Phase 2, data were collected from 537 nurses from hospitals across Pakistan to establish reliability and construct validity. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and convergent validity. Results: Expert review demonstrated strong content validity (S-CVI = 0.95). Minor revisions were made after cognitive interviews to improve clarity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a 21-item, two-factor model with acceptable fit (χ2/df = 4.062, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.921, RMSEA = 0.076, GFI = 0.88). Both factors demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. Significant correlation between the signs and symptoms, complication and management domains of DKSCQ-N and Dysphagia knowledge Scale supported convergent validity. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.906) and test-retest reliability indicated excellent stability over two-weeks period (ICC = 0.829). Conclusion: The DKSCQ-N is a valid and reliable instrument to assess dysphagia knowledge and self-reported competence of nurses. It provides a comprehensive and contextually relevant measure that can help identify learning needs and assess training outcomes in hospital settings.

Related

  1. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and measurement invariance of the First Aid Willingness Questionnaire (FAWQ) among Turkish adolescents
    Harun Özbey, Özlem Çalışır, Meral Bayat +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textAlgebra & number theoryStatisticsPLOSEurope PMC
  2. A cross-sectional validation study of the verran and snyder-halpern sleep scale and the factors influencing sleep questionnaire in Dutch hospitals
    Christel T. A. J. Derks, Jessica J. J. Cramer-Kruit, Paul Lodder +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyStatisticsPLOS
  3. Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire to evaluate the professional behavior of medical residents
    Shahsanam Gheibi, Mohammad Heidari, Alireza Alemi +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceStatisticsPLOS
  4. The double-edged sword of human-AI collaboration on design students’ competence development: The mediating roles of challenge and hindrance appraisals and the asymmetric moderation of teacher AI leadership
    Xiang Wang, MingXing Li, Jia Du +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceStatisticsPLOS
  5. Reconstructing the Human Development Index at the Individual Level from Survey Microdata: Development and Validation of a Methodology
    Tcharlies Bachmann Schmitz, Natalia Veronez da Cunha, Isabelle Ferreira
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{mubeen2026development,
  title = {{Development and validation of dysphagia knowledge and self-reported competence questionnaire for nurses}},
  author = {Raffa Mubeen and Asghar Khan and Humaira Shamim Kiyani and Ayesha Kamal Butt and Hans Bogaardt and Sadaf Noveen},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358250},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358250},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and validation of dysphagia knowledge and self-reported competence questionnaire for nurses
AU  - Raffa Mubeen
AU  - Asghar Khan
AU  - Humaira Shamim Kiyani
AU  - Ayesha Kamal Butt
AU  - Hans Bogaardt
AU  - Sadaf Noveen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358250
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358250
AB  - Background: Dysphagia is a common condition across healthcare settings and is associated with serious complications. Nurses play a key role in early identification and safe management. However, substantial gaps exist in nurses’ knowledge and competence. The scope of existing dysphagia questionnaires is limited, and most are designed for specialised populations. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive tool to assess nurses’ knowledge and perceived competence in dysphagia care. Methods: The Dysphagia Knowledge and Self-reported Competence Questionnaire for Nurses (DKSCQ-N) was developed and validated in two phases. Phase 1 included item generation through literature review, mapping items across six domains, and expert evaluation using a Table of Specification and the Content Validity Index. Cognitive interviews with nurses were conducted to assess clarity, relevance and usability. In Phase 2, data were collected from 537 nurses from hospitals across Pakistan to establish reliability and construct validity. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and convergent validity. Results: Expert review demonstrated strong content validity (S-CVI = 0.95). Minor revisions were made after cognitive interviews to improve clarity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a 21-item, two-factor model with acceptable fit (χ2/df = 4.062, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.921, RMSEA = 0.076, GFI = 0.88). Both factors demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. Significant correlation between the signs and symptoms, complication and management domains of DKSCQ-N and Dysphagia knowledge Scale supported convergent validity. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.906) and test-retest reliability indicated excellent stability over two-weeks period (ICC = 0.829). Conclusion: The DKSCQ-N is a valid and reliable instrument to assess dysphagia knowledge and self-reported competence of nurses. It provides a comprehensive and contextually relevant measure that can help identify learning needs and assess training outcomes in hospital settings.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -