Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Ecology and Evolution

Artificial Light at Night Alters Both of Nocturnal and Diurnal Pollination Networks in Alpine Meadows

  1. 1College of Life Science Northwest Normal University Lanzhou China

Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) is an increasingly pervasive driver of global change that disrupts natural diel rhythms and alters species interactions. However, its effects on plant–pollinator networks across coupled day–night systems remain poorly understood, particularly in environmentally sensitive alpine ecosystems. Here, we conducted a field manipulation experiment in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau, comparing illuminated and unlit conditions, and constructed temporally explicit pollination networks by integrating diurnal and nocturnal interactions. Despite no detectable changes in plant community composition, ALAN significantly restructured pollinator‐mediated interactions. At night, visitation by Lepidoptera (primarily moths), the dominant pollinators, declined sharply (−57.5%), coinciding with an overall reduction in visitation frequency (−35.4%) and a substantial decrease in network nestedness (−64.7%). In contrast, Diptera visitation increased markedly (+179.6%), partially offsetting the reduction in total visitation associated with the decline in Lepidoptera visitation. ALAN also increased nocturnal network modularity by 12.8%, indicating greater compartmentalization of nocturnal plant–pollinator interactions. Notably, these effects extended beyond the nocturnal period. During the day, total visitation remained unchanged, but strong shifts in pollinator composition emerged: Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Coleoptera declined (−20.0%, −51.8%, and −61.7%, respectively), whereas Diptera increased (+46.3%). These changes were accompanied by a significant increase in network connectance (+16.1%), whereas nestedness and modularity remained unaffected by ALAN. The decline in nocturnal nestedness was primarily driven by reductions in Lepidoptera, whereas the increase in diurnal connectance was associated with increased Diptera visitation and reduced Hymenoptera visitation. Together, our results demonstrate that ALAN reorganizes plant–pollinator networks through differential responses among pollinator groups, with some groups declining while others increase in visitation and cross‐diel cascading effects, thereby altering the organization of species interactions across both nocturnal and diurnal pollination systems. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating diel dynamics into ecological network research and underscore the need to mitigate light pollution in vulnerable alpine ecosystems.

Related

  1. Beyond the curfew : Diurnal coral reef fish and mesopredator behavioural modifications under artificial light at night in the wild intensifies nocturnal predator-prey interactions
    Thibaut Roost, Erin Campbell-Hooper, Frédéric Zuberer +4
    Marine Pollution BulletinPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyHAL
  2. The dark side of herbivorous insects in Neotropical savannas: plant–herbivore networks across diurnal and nocturnal periods
    Jefferson Bruno B. Souza-Oliveira, Leonardo V. A. Costa, Wesley Dáttilo +1
    OecologiaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyPMC
  3. Pygmy blue whale feeding drives greater nocturnal than diurnal song production
    Andrew M. Davenport, Michele Thums, K. Curt S. Jenner +5
    Royal Society Open SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. Nocturnal vocalizations in diurnal birds: a systematic review of current knowledge, research gaps and future directions
    Cristian Pérez-Granados, Esther Sebastián-González, Krzysztof Deoniziak +5
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEcologyEvolutionary biologyEcoEvoRxiv
  5. The effectiveness of artificial pollination in various representatives of the genus Pisum L.
    A.O. Vasylenko, N.O. Vus, L.M. Shevchenko +4
    The Journal of V.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series «Biology»Peer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral biologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{lu2026artificial,
  title = {{Artificial Light at Night Alters Both of Nocturnal and Diurnal Pollination Networks in Alpine Meadows}},
  author = {Ningna Lu and Yinyin Wang and Wei Cai and Yangyang Chen and Lifang Yin and Xiuke Chen and Jie Cao and Qianqian Luo},
  journal = {Ecology and Evolution},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/ece3.74368},
  url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.74368},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Artificial Light at Night Alters Both of Nocturnal and Diurnal Pollination Networks in Alpine Meadows
AU  - Ningna Lu
AU  - Yinyin Wang
AU  - Wei Cai
AU  - Yangyang Chen
AU  - Lifang Yin
AU  - Xiuke Chen
AU  - Jie Cao
AU  - Qianqian Luo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Ecology and Evolution
DO  - 10.1002/ece3.74368
UR  - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.74368
AB  - Artificial light at night (ALAN) is an increasingly pervasive driver of global change that disrupts natural diel rhythms and alters species interactions. However, its effects on plant–pollinator networks across coupled day–night systems remain poorly understood, particularly in environmentally sensitive alpine ecosystems. Here, we conducted a field manipulation experiment in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau, comparing illuminated and unlit conditions, and constructed temporally explicit pollination networks by integrating diurnal and nocturnal interactions. Despite no detectable changes in plant community composition, ALAN significantly restructured pollinator‐mediated interactions. At night, visitation by Lepidoptera (primarily moths), the dominant pollinators, declined sharply (−57.5%), coinciding with an overall reduction in visitation frequency (−35.4%) and a substantial decrease in network nestedness (−64.7%). In contrast, Diptera visitation increased markedly (+179.6%), partially offsetting the reduction in total visitation associated with the decline in Lepidoptera visitation. ALAN also increased nocturnal network modularity by 12.8%, indicating greater compartmentalization of nocturnal plant–pollinator interactions. Notably, these effects extended beyond the nocturnal period. During the day, total visitation remained unchanged, but strong shifts in pollinator composition emerged: Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Coleoptera declined (−20.0%, −51.8%, and −61.7%, respectively), whereas Diptera increased (+46.3%). These changes were accompanied by a significant increase in network connectance (+16.1%), whereas nestedness and modularity remained unaffected by ALAN. The decline in nocturnal nestedness was primarily driven by reductions in Lepidoptera, whereas the increase in diurnal connectance was associated with increased Diptera visitation and reduced Hymenoptera visitation. Together, our results demonstrate that ALAN reorganizes plant–pollinator networks through differential responses among pollinator groups, with some groups declining while others increase in visitation and cross‐diel cascading effects, thereby altering the organization of species interactions across both nocturnal and diurnal pollination systems. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating diel dynamics into ecological network research and underscore the need to mitigate light pollution in vulnerable alpine ecosystems.
SN  - 2045-7758
SN  - 2045-7758
ER  -