Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Mathematics

Student Psychology-Based Optimization Algorithm Enhanced by Teaching–Learning Mechanism for Global Optimization and Real-World Issues

  1. 1Institute of Education, University College London, London WC1H 6BT, UK
  2. 2School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China

Abstract

Student Psychology-Based Optimization (SPBO) provides a simple human-inspired search framework, but its dependence on random subject-wise learning behaviors, limited peer interaction, and insufficient utilization of historical information may restrict its performance on complex multimodal optimization problems. To address these limitations, this study proposes a Multi-Strategy Improved Student Psychology-Based Optimization algorithm, termed MLSPBO. Three complementary learning mechanisms are incorporated into the original framework. First, a multi-teacher hierarchical guidance strategy constructs a rank-weighted collective teaching reference to reduce excessive dependence on a single elite individual and provide diversified search directions. Second, a rank-adaptive peer mutual-learning strategy enables individuals with different performance levels to adopt differentiated learning behaviors, thereby enhancing information exchange and population diversity. Third, a self-reflection and remedial learning strategy exploits historical best information and search stagnation to strengthen local refinement and escape from unfavorable regions. The performance of MLSPBO is evaluated on the CEC2020 and CEC2022 benchmark suites under 10- and 20-dimensional settings and compared with nine representative metaheuristic algorithms. MLSPBO obtains the best or tied-best mean results on 7/10 and 9/10 CEC2020 functions and on 11/12 functions under both CEC2022 settings. Its Friedman mean ranks are 1.30, 1.10, 1.33, and 1.17, respectively, consistently ranking first among all compared methods. In addition, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test yields an aggregated 39 wins, 3 ties, and 2 losses against the original SPBO. The practical performance of MLSPBO was further evaluated using a three-dimensional robotic arm path planning problem. Its mean cost was 291.34, approximately 5.44% lower than that obtained by NDO and 6.10% lower than that of the original SPBO. The results suggest that the proposed method is not limited to numerical benchmark optimization and can also provide reliable solutions for constrained robotic path-planning tasks.

Related

  1. A new algorithm for topology optimization using a level-set method
    Samuel Amstutz, Heiko Andrä
    Journal of Computational PhysicsPeer-reviewedLicence not stated349 citedGeneral mathematicsHAL
  2. Optimization of Quadratic Sieve Algorithm Implementation for Large Integer Factorization
    Zihan Guan, Xiaodong Zhuang, Nikos E. Mastorakis
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. Pre-training of Bayesian Optimization Algorithm through Bayesian Optimization
    Satoshi Katayama, Shoyo Hunt, Shintaro Masuda +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Sparse descent subspace-Newton thresholding algorithm for sparse optimization problems
    Zhong-Feng Sun, Nan Meng, Yun-Bin Zhao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Depth analysis of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm with a Grover mixer
    Bojko N. Bakalov, Dimitar Grantcharov
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@article{li2026student,
  title = {{Student Psychology-Based Optimization Algorithm Enhanced by Teaching–Learning Mechanism for Global Optimization and Real-World Issues}},
  author = {Rutong Li and Kou Lei},
  journal = {Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/math14203683},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/20/3683},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Student Psychology-Based Optimization Algorithm Enhanced by Teaching–Learning Mechanism for Global Optimization and Real-World Issues
AU  - Rutong Li
AU  - Kou Lei
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/10
JO  - Mathematics
DO  - 10.3390/math14203683
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/20/3683
AB  - Student Psychology-Based Optimization (SPBO) provides a simple human-inspired search framework, but its dependence on random subject-wise learning behaviors, limited peer interaction, and insufficient utilization of historical information may restrict its performance on complex multimodal optimization problems. To address these limitations, this study proposes a Multi-Strategy Improved Student Psychology-Based Optimization algorithm, termed MLSPBO. Three complementary learning mechanisms are incorporated into the original framework. First, a multi-teacher hierarchical guidance strategy constructs a rank-weighted collective teaching reference to reduce excessive dependence on a single elite individual and provide diversified search directions. Second, a rank-adaptive peer mutual-learning strategy enables individuals with different performance levels to adopt differentiated learning behaviors, thereby enhancing information exchange and population diversity. Third, a self-reflection and remedial learning strategy exploits historical best information and search stagnation to strengthen local refinement and escape from unfavorable regions. The performance of MLSPBO is evaluated on the CEC2020 and CEC2022 benchmark suites under 10- and 20-dimensional settings and compared with nine representative metaheuristic algorithms. MLSPBO obtains the best or tied-best mean results on 7/10 and 9/10 CEC2020 functions and on 11/12 functions under both CEC2022 settings. Its Friedman mean ranks are 1.30, 1.10, 1.33, and 1.17, respectively, consistently ranking first among all compared methods. In addition, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test yields an aggregated 39 wins, 3 ties, and 2 losses against the original SPBO. The practical performance of MLSPBO was further evaluated using a three-dimensional robotic arm path planning problem. Its mean cost was 291.34, approximately 5.44% lower than that obtained by NDO and 6.10% lower than that of the original SPBO. The results suggest that the proposed method is not limited to numerical benchmark optimization and can also provide reliable solutions for constrained robotic path-planning tasks.
SN  - 2227-7390
ER  -