Atrial Septostomy and Left Ventricular Venting During Peripheral VA-ECMO
7 affiliations
- 1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
- 2Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
- 3Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
- 4Department of Cardiac Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
- 5Department of Anesthesia, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
- 6Department of Cardiac Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
- 7Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
Abstract
Background: Peripheral venoarterial (VA)–extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) increases left ventricular (LV) afterload, and therefore the risk of LV distension, pulmonary edema, and cardiac stasis. Balloon atrial septostomy (BAS) provides atrial-level unloading, but the durability of LV venting remains uncertain.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of BAS for LV venting in patients requiring peripheral VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock (CS).
Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study of consecutive adults with CS supported with peripheral VA-ECMO who underwent BAS for LV unloading at an academic center (2019-2024). The primary endpoint was LV venting failure, a composite of pulmonary edema, LV distension, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast, LV or aortic root thrombus, stroke due to ECMO, or escalation to additional mechanical support.
Results: A total of 28 patients were included in the study. BAS resulted in a significant reduction in mean left atrial pressure (20.5-13.5 mm Hg; P < 0.001). Durable LV venting was achieved in a subset of patients; however, LV venting failure occurred in 53.6%, driven primarily by pulmonary edema. Pulse-pressure trajectories differed according to eventual LV venting-failure status (interaction P = 0.018). Model-estimated pulse pressure was higher at 48 hours (P = 0.010) and 72 hours (P = 0.031) among patients who ultimately did not experience venting failure.
Conclusions: Among patients receiving peripheral VA-ECMO for CS, BAS achieves atrial-level decompression and may provide durable LV venting in select patients, although venting failure remains common. Observed arterial pulse-pressure trajectories differed according to eventual LV venting failure status.
Related
- Standardized 4-step surgical approach to address atrial fibrillation during coronary artery bypass grafting in a patient with severely reduced left ventricular function: a case report
- Association Between Left Atrial Enlargement and Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients with Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction
- Predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance atrial and ventricular strain for adverse prognosis in patients with myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Transatrial air-assisted epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and management of postprocedural right atrial thrombus.
- Atrial septal defect associated with suspected left ventricular non-compaction supported by histopathological findings in a child
BibTeX
@article{kapoor2026atrial,
title = {{Atrial Septostomy and Left Ventricular Venting During Peripheral VA-ECMO}},
author = {Arjun B Kapoor and Joy Stouffer and Dhruv Sarma and Nanda Nayak and Parth Visrodia and Brandon Petree and Enock Adjei and Amir Teimouri Dereshgi and Emily N Hollis and Jared O'Leary and Bret Alvis and Aaron Williams and Matthew Bacchetta and Aniket S Rali},
journal = {JACC: Advances},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103344},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103344},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Atrial Septostomy and Left Ventricular Venting During Peripheral VA-ECMO
AU - Arjun B Kapoor
AU - Joy Stouffer
AU - Dhruv Sarma
AU - Nanda Nayak
AU - Parth Visrodia
AU - Brandon Petree
AU - Enock Adjei
AU - Amir Teimouri Dereshgi
AU - Emily N Hollis
AU - Jared O'Leary
AU - Bret Alvis
AU - Aaron Williams
AU - Matthew Bacchetta
AU - Aniket S Rali
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
JO - JACC: Advances
DO - 10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103344
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103344
AB - Background: Peripheral venoarterial (VA)–extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) increases left ventricular (LV) afterload, and therefore the risk of LV distension, pulmonary edema, and cardiac stasis. Balloon atrial septostomy (BAS) provides atrial-level unloading, but the durability of LV venting remains uncertain. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of BAS for LV venting in patients requiring peripheral VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study of consecutive adults with CS supported with peripheral VA-ECMO who underwent BAS for LV unloading at an academic center (2019-2024). The primary endpoint was LV venting failure, a composite of pulmonary edema, LV distension, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast, LV or aortic root thrombus, stroke due to ECMO, or escalation to additional mechanical support. Results: A total of 28 patients were included in the study. BAS resulted in a significant reduction in mean left atrial pressure (20.5-13.5 mm Hg; P < 0.001). Durable LV venting was achieved in a subset of patients; however, LV venting failure occurred in 53.6%, driven primarily by pulmonary edema. Pulse-pressure trajectories differed according to eventual LV venting-failure status (interaction P = 0.018). Model-estimated pulse pressure was higher at 48 hours (P = 0.010) and 72 hours (P = 0.031) among patients who ultimately did not experience venting failure. Conclusions: Among patients receiving peripheral VA-ECMO for CS, BAS achieves atrial-level decompression and may provide durable LV venting in select patients, although venting failure remains common. Observed arterial pulse-pressure trajectories differed according to eventual LV venting failure status.
SN - 2772-963X
ER -