Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Relational Multiplicity in Group Synchrony: Properties, Cognitive Demands, and Methodological Framework

Abstract

Interpersonal synchrony has typically been studied as temporal alignment between two individuals, yet much social coordination unfolds in groups. We argue that the shift from dyads to groups is structural rather than merely quantitative and lies in relational multiplicity: each individual can coordinate simultaneously and differentially with multiple others, allowing heterogeneous coupling topologies, subgroups, coalitions, and changing role configurations to emerge. Distributed, selective, and flexible synchrony are properties that describe this multi-relational architecture. This shift creates a distinct explanatory target: not simply how strongly individuals synchronize, but how multiple local interpersonal alignments are selectively organized and reorganized to produce system-level coordination. Addressing this target requires linking cognitive and neural processes that support social selection to network-based approaches that quantify synchrony as weighted, potentially directed, temporal, and multimodal patterns of coupling across group members. From this perspective, successful group coordination should not be expected to correspond to uniformly high synchrony, but to context-appropriate configuration and reconfiguration of synchrony across members, signals, and time.

Related

  1. Interpersonal Synchrony During a Client-Therapist Role-Play Interaction: The Role of Modalities, Facets, and Relational Context.
    Noha M Yassen, Jacobien M van Peer, Ger P J Keijsers +2
    PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCPMC
  2. Physiological Synchrony Across Modalities Within and Between Individuals: A Methodological Exploration of Crossmodality.
    Wolfgang Tschacher, Anu Tourunen, Petra Nyman-Salonen +1
    PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  3. Do methodological limitations and confounding factors explain the apparent acceleration of cognitive decline in older adults taking omega-3 fatty acid supplements?
    Simon Dyall, Mélanie Plourde
    The Journal of prevention of Alzheimer's diseasePeer-reviewedCC BYGeneral biologyHAL
  4. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the self-regulated learning scale in clinical nursing practice for nursing students: A methodological study
    Ali Bazzi, Zahra Dizaji, Zahra Mozaffari +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceAlgebra & number theoryPLOS
  5. A Dynamic State‐Based Framework for Quantifying Triadic Autonomic Synchrony During Group Decision‐Making
    Yubraj Gupta, Stefanie Suttkus, Uwe Altmann +4
    PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{carollo2026relational,
  title = {{Relational Multiplicity in Group Synchrony: Properties, Cognitive Demands, and Methodological Framework}},
  author = {Alessandro Carollo and Ilanit Gordon},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/6b3hg_v1},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6b3hg_v1/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Relational Multiplicity in Group Synchrony: Properties, Cognitive Demands, and Methodological Framework
AU  - Alessandro Carollo
AU  - Ilanit Gordon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/04
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/6b3hg_v1
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6b3hg_v1/
AB  - Interpersonal synchrony has typically been studied as temporal alignment between two individuals, yet much social coordination unfolds in groups. We argue that the shift from dyads to groups is structural rather than merely quantitative and lies in relational multiplicity: each individual can coordinate simultaneously and differentially with multiple others, allowing heterogeneous coupling topologies, subgroups, coalitions, and changing role configurations to emerge. Distributed, selective, and flexible synchrony are properties that describe this multi-relational architecture. This shift creates a distinct explanatory target: not simply how strongly individuals synchronize, but how multiple local interpersonal alignments are selectively organized and reorganized to produce system-level coordination. Addressing this target requires linking cognitive and neural processes that support social selection to network-based approaches that quantify synchrony as weighted, potentially directed, temporal, and multimodal patterns of coupling across group members. From this perspective, successful group coordination should not be expected to correspond to uniformly high synchrony, but to context-appropriate configuration and reconfiguration of synchrony across members, signals, and time.
ER  -