Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,761 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Clinical deep sequencing to diagnose pathogenic mosaic variants in malformations of cortical development and epilepsy

2 more authors
  1. 1Boston Children's Hospital

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesDeep sequencing of brain tissue in the research setting has established that mosaic variants are a major cause of malformations of cortical development (MCDs) and epilepsy. However, genetic testing in the clinical setting primarily detects germline variants using clinically accessible samples. We aimed to determine the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of deep sequencing in the clinical setting to identify pathogenic mosaic variants for this population.

MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort analysis of individuals at Boston Childrens Hospital with MCDs with or without epilepsy who received clinical deep sequencing between September 2017 and February 2026. Demographic, clinical, and genetic testing data were abstracted from the medical record. For individuals without systemic features, we classified brain tissue as an affected tissue sample. For individuals with systemic features, we classified brain or relevant non-brain tissue as affected. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of clinical deep sequencing performed using affected vs unaffected tissue samples. The secondary outcome was the clinical utility of genetic diagnoses.

ResultsOur cohort included 37 individuals (19/37 (51%) female, 18/37 (49%) male) with MCDs, of whom 35/37 (95%) had epilepsy (25 with brain tissue samples available from epilepsy surgery) and 8/37 (22%) had systemic features. Most (35/37 (95%)) had dysplasia phenotypes on MRI and 12/27 (44%) with pathology available had Focal Cortical Dysplasia Type I or II. The diagnostic yield was 53% (17/32; 16 mosaic and 1 germline variant) when clinical deep sequencing was performed using an affected tissue sample vs 0% (0/6) using an unaffected tissue sample (p=0.016). Of the diagnosed cases, 13/17 (76%) had testing performed on brain tissue (1 with systemic features) and 4/17 (24%) on non-brain tissue (3 buccal and 1 duodenal tissue, all with systemic features). All but one diagnosis involved the mTOR pathway. All diagnoses had clinical utility.

DiscussionClinical deep sequencing, when performed using an affected tissue sample, has high diagnostic yield and clinical utility for individuals with MCDs, especially dysplasia phenotypes, and epilepsy. Our findings support implementation of clinical deep sequencing for this population, especially as the genetic diagnoses have implications for emerging precision therapies.

Related

  1. Development of type-specific amplicon schemes for whole-genome sequencing of seasonal human coronaviruses from clinical samples
    Anja Ošep, Hannah Goldswain, Alen Suljič +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  2. Preservation of Non-nidal Medial Veins During Microsurgical Resection of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Technical Considerations and Early Clinical Outcomes
    Md. Moshiur Rahman, Robert Ahmed Khan, Md. Rokibul Islam +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Whole-genome sequencing of 197 cases with Parkinson’s disease reveals novel pathogenic variants in the Indian population
    Hiba Ali, Banashree Mondal, Andie Pinto +16
    NPJ Parkinson's DiseasePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedNeurologyPMC
  4. Contrast‑enhanced ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of vascular malformations in the head and neck: Initial clinical experience in a paediatric case series
    Fritjof Lentge, Philipp Jehn, Omar Abu-Fares +4
    Ultrasound: Journal of the British Medical Ultrasound SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMCEurope PMC
  5. A case of renal hypouricemia type 1 associated with compound heterozygous URAT1/SLC22A12 variants A209V and F379L: clinical evidence for their pathogenic significance
    Naoyuki Otani, Marie Yamamoto, Tomoaki Takata +10
    CEN case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{stone2026clinical,
  title = {{Clinical deep sequencing to diagnose pathogenic mosaic variants in malformations of cortical development and epilepsy}},
  author = {K. Stone and G. Prinzing and A. Lai and L. Smith and B. R. Sheidley and M. M. Corliss and K. Bowling and Y. Cao and K. Wiltrout and S. S. D. Stone and H. Lidov and E. Yang and A. Poduri and A. M. D'Gama},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.01.26361943},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.01.26361943v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Clinical deep sequencing to diagnose pathogenic mosaic variants in malformations of cortical development and epilepsy
AU  - K. Stone
AU  - G. Prinzing
AU  - A. Lai
AU  - L. Smith
AU  - B. R. Sheidley
AU  - M. M. Corliss
AU  - K. Bowling
AU  - Y. Cao
AU  - K. Wiltrout
AU  - S. S. D. Stone
AU  - H. Lidov
AU  - E. Yang
AU  - A. Poduri
AU  - A. M. D'Gama
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.01.26361943
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.01.26361943v1
AB  - Background and ObjectivesDeep sequencing of brain tissue in the research setting has established that mosaic variants are a major cause of malformations of cortical development (MCDs) and epilepsy. However, genetic testing in the clinical setting primarily detects germline variants using clinically accessible samples. We aimed to determine the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of deep sequencing in the clinical setting to identify pathogenic mosaic variants for this population.  MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort analysis of individuals at Boston Childrens Hospital with MCDs with or without epilepsy who received clinical deep sequencing between September 2017 and February 2026. Demographic, clinical, and genetic testing data were abstracted from the medical record. For individuals without systemic features, we classified brain tissue as an affected tissue sample. For individuals with systemic features, we classified brain or relevant non-brain tissue as affected. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of clinical deep sequencing performed using affected vs unaffected tissue samples. The secondary outcome was the clinical utility of genetic diagnoses.  ResultsOur cohort included 37 individuals (19/37 (51%) female, 18/37 (49%) male) with MCDs, of whom 35/37 (95%) had epilepsy (25 with brain tissue samples available from epilepsy surgery) and 8/37 (22%) had systemic features. Most (35/37 (95%)) had dysplasia phenotypes on MRI and 12/27 (44%) with pathology available had Focal Cortical Dysplasia Type I or II. The diagnostic yield was 53% (17/32; 16 mosaic and 1 germline variant) when clinical deep sequencing was performed using an affected tissue sample vs 0% (0/6) using an unaffected tissue sample (p=0.016). Of the diagnosed cases, 13/17 (76%) had testing performed on brain tissue (1 with systemic features) and 4/17 (24%) on non-brain tissue (3 buccal and 1 duodenal tissue, all with systemic features). All but one diagnosis involved the mTOR pathway. All diagnoses had clinical utility.  DiscussionClinical deep sequencing, when performed using an affected tissue sample, has high diagnostic yield and clinical utility for individuals with MCDs, especially dysplasia phenotypes, and epilepsy. Our findings support implementation of clinical deep sequencing for this population, especially as the genetic diagnoses have implications for emerging precision therapies.
ER  -