Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBrain structure & function

Quantifying dexterity and grip strength associations between age, cognitive function (MoCA), and cerebellar gray matter volume in healthy adults across the adult lifespan.

  1. 1Department of Psychology, McCausland College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. [email protected].
  2. 2Department of Psychology, McCausland College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Abstract

Cerebellar Crus I/II gray matter volume (GMV) is a structural marker of cognitive aging, and motor performance predicts age-related cognitive decline. Whether grip strength and manual dexterity dissociate in their cerebellar and cognitive correlates is unknown. We computed Pearson partial correlations (age, sex, and race covaried) between grip strength, Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) dexterity, cerebellar Crus I/II GMV, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) subscores in 304 healthy adults aged 20-79 from the University of South Carolina Aging Brain Cohort. GMV was derived from T1-weighted MRI using CAT12 with the AAL3 atlas. After false discovery rate (FDR) correction, dominant 9HPT time correlated with MoCA total score (r=-.240) and memory index (r=-.220; both pFDR<0.001). Grip strength was unrelated to any MoCA measure but correlated bilaterally with Crus II GMV (r=.156-.224, all pFDR≤0.041). Bootstrapped mediation indicated that dexterity statistically accounted for 28.8% of the age-cognition association and Crus II volume for 34.4-41.4% of the age-grip association. Dichotomizing at the MoCA cut-off of 26, each additional second of peg time carried 17.6% higher odds of scoring below cut-off (odds ratio = 1.176, 95% CI [1.062,1.302]) while grip strength carried none. Grip strength, but not dexterity, was independently associated with Crus II GMV, whereas dexterity, but not grip, was associated with cognition. Grip strength and dexterity are therefore not interchangeable indices of motor function. Because the design is cross-sectional, mediation estimates describe shared variance rather than causal pathways, and the pronounced MoCA ceiling likely attenuated the cognitive associations.

Related

  1. Do strategically demanding sports shape hand function alike? Distinct profiles of dexterity and grip strength in basketball and badminton athletes
    Xinpeng Gao, Jinlong Hou, Chengzhe Du +3
    Frontiers in physiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Longitudinal changes in hand dominance and manual dexterity in normal aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI): a kinematic study
    Olena Vasylenko, Claudia Rodríguez-Aranda
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Impact of neuropathy severity on hand function, strength, and dexterity in patients with oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.
    Özge Köseoğlu, Selvi Dinçer, Necla Gürdal +2
    BMC cancerPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
  4. Remote Online-Based Application of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale.
    Sönke Konrad, Johanna Aschmann, Raquel van der Veen +4
    Cerebellum (London, England)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. The associations between muscle strength and executive function among Chinese adolescents
    Lu Li, Mengmeng Zhang, Feng Zhang +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{kannan2026quantifying,
  title = {{Quantifying dexterity and grip strength associations between age, cognitive function (MoCA), and cerebellar gray matter volume in healthy adults across the adult lifespan.}},
  author = {Pranesh Rajesh Kannan and Raghav Pallapothu and Santosh Kudaravalli and Sriya Pallapothu and Roger D Newman-Norlund},
  journal = {Brain structure \& function},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s00429-026-03213-6},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42911437},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Quantifying dexterity and grip strength associations between age, cognitive function (MoCA), and cerebellar gray matter volume in healthy adults across the adult lifespan.
AU  - Pranesh Rajesh Kannan
AU  - Raghav Pallapothu
AU  - Santosh Kudaravalli
AU  - Sriya Pallapothu
AU  - Roger D Newman-Norlund
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Brain structure & function
DO  - 10.1007/s00429-026-03213-6
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42911437
AB  - Cerebellar Crus I/II gray matter volume (GMV) is a structural marker of cognitive aging, and motor performance predicts age-related cognitive decline. Whether grip strength and manual dexterity dissociate in their cerebellar and cognitive correlates is unknown. We computed Pearson partial correlations (age, sex, and race covaried) between grip strength, Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) dexterity, cerebellar Crus I/II GMV, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) subscores in 304 healthy adults aged 20-79 from the University of South Carolina Aging Brain Cohort. GMV was derived from T1-weighted MRI using CAT12 with the AAL3 atlas. After false discovery rate (FDR) correction, dominant 9HPT time correlated with MoCA total score (r=-.240) and memory index (r=-.220; both pFDR<0.001). Grip strength was unrelated to any MoCA measure but correlated bilaterally with Crus II GMV (r=.156-.224, all pFDR≤0.041). Bootstrapped mediation indicated that dexterity statistically accounted for 28.8% of the age-cognition association and Crus II volume for 34.4-41.4% of the age-grip association. Dichotomizing at the MoCA cut-off of 26, each additional second of peg time carried 17.6% higher odds of scoring below cut-off (odds ratio = 1.176, 95% CI [1.062,1.302]) while grip strength carried none. Grip strength, but not dexterity, was independently associated with Crus II GMV, whereas dexterity, but not grip, was associated with cognition. Grip strength and dexterity are therefore not interchangeable indices of motor function. Because the design is cross-sectional, mediation estimates describe shared variance rather than causal pathways, and the pronounced MoCA ceiling likely attenuated the cognitive associations.
SN  - 1863-2653
SN  - 1863-2661
ER  -