Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Innovations Agronomiques

Multi-criteria assessment uses

Abstract

Characterizing the uses of multicriteria evaluation methods meets several objectives and is based on a set of criteria. These must be updated to take account of the evolution of evaluation conditions and needs, particularly in terms of purposes. Diagnosis of uses and functional tool testing approaches, based on the notion of activity, provide a basis to deepen and expand this characterization. A proposed representation intended to encourage the adaptation of methods could also be relevant to help evaluators choose their method. Finally, all the objectives that require knowledge of uses could also benefit from the opportunities offered by the development of participatory approaches.

Related

  1. Methodological Challenges of Multi-Criteria Assessment in Agri-Food Systems: Some Perspectives
    Joël Aubin, Christine Leclercq, Clotilde Rouillon +3
    Innovations AgronomiquesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Seasonal Aridity Characterisation and AHP-Weighted Multi-Criteria Land Suitability Assessment for Cotton in a Semi-Arid Taluka of Saurashtra, Gujarat, India
    Hardeep Kumar, N. K. Gontia, Pritam Das +1
    Journal of Scientific Research and ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. Optimization of UV-C irradiation time for biologically treated saline wastewater using artificial neural networks and a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework
    Mohammadnabi Omidvar, Farshad Farahbod
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  4. Integrating land-use dynamics, water quality, and multi-criteria ecological suitability for fish sanctuary prioritization in three major river basins of Bangladesh
    Murad Ahmed Farukh, M. Zulfikar Rahman, Md. Abdus Salam +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  5. Comparative analysis of 13 types of adsorbent materials for water pollutant removal via a multi-criteria evaluation of performance cost circular economy green chemistry and durability
    Said Meftah, Khadija Meftah, Mourad Addich +1
    Discover EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text13 citedHydrology & soilsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{leclercq2026multicriteria,
  title = {{Multi-criteria assessment uses}},
  author = {Christine Leclercq},
  journal = {Innovations Agronomiques},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.17180/ciag-2026-vol115-art09},
  url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05809724v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Multi-criteria assessment uses
AU  - Christine Leclercq
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - Innovations Agronomiques
DO  - 10.17180/ciag-2026-vol115-art09
UR  - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05809724v1
AB  - Characterizing the uses of multicriteria evaluation methods meets several objectives and is based on a set of criteria. These must be updated to take account of the evolution of evaluation conditions and needs, particularly in terms of purposes. Diagnosis of uses and functional tool testing approaches, based on the notion of activity, provide a basis to deepen and expand this characterization. A proposed representation intended to encourage the adaptation of methods could also be relevant to help evaluators choose their method. Finally, all the objectives that require knowledge of uses could also benefit from the opportunities offered by the development of participatory approaches.
SN  - 1958-5853
SN  - 1958-5853
ER  -