Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

On Carmichael Numbers Constructed from Consecutive Jacobsthal Numbers

Abstract

We prove that no Carmichael number has the form N=(2mJn+1)(2mJn+1+1)(2mJn+2+1), where Jn=(2n−(−1)n)/3 is the Jacobsthal sequence, m,n≥1, and all three factors are prime. Assuming that such an N is Carmichael, Korselt's criterion yields divisibility conditions relating consecutive Jacobsthal numbers to powers of two. Combining these conditions with the Binet formula and a finite case analysis for n≤4, we obtain a contradiction. Consequently, this family contains no Carmichael numbers.

Related

  1. Matrix representations and arithmetic properties of jacobsthal numbers via binary 3x3 matrices
    Wilson Arley Martinez, Samin Ingrith Ceron
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. A Note on Carmichael Numbers of the form $ N=(d+1)(3d+1)(4d+1)$
    Hayat Bensella
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. The Prime Wavelet Tree: Compressing the Carmichael Numbers
    Ankur Gupta, Jonathan Webster, Sylvia Webster
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. A Korselt Characterization of Carmichael Numbers of the Form (aCn+1)(aCn+1+1)(aCn+2+1)
    Hayat Bensella
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Idempotence in Carmichael and Giuga numbers and its application to the Agoh-Giuga conjecture
    Miguel Ángel López
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{bensella2026carmichael,
  title = {{On Carmichael Numbers Constructed from Consecutive Jacobsthal Numbers}},
  author = {Hayat Bensella},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.26065},
  eprint = {2610.26065},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26065},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - On Carmichael Numbers Constructed from Consecutive Jacobsthal Numbers
AU  - Hayat Bensella
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.26065
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26065
AB  - We prove that no Carmichael number has the form N=(2^mJ_n+1)(2^mJ_n+1+1)(2^mJ_n+2+1), where J_n=(2^n−(−1)^n)/3 is the Jacobsthal sequence, m,n≥1, and all three factors are prime. Assuming that such an N is Carmichael, Korselt's criterion yields divisibility conditions relating consecutive Jacobsthal numbers to powers of two. Combining these conditions with the Binet formula and a finite case analysis for n≤4, we obtain a contradiction. Consequently, this family contains no Carmichael numbers.
ER  -