Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
179,152 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYNorth American Spine Society journal

Intraspinal abnormalities in MRI-evaluated congenital scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, geographic variation, vertebral anomaly patterns, and Cobb angle.

  1. 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, King Khalid Road, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia.
  2. 2College of Medicine, King Saud University, King Khalid Road, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia.
  3. 3Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.

Abstract

Background

Intraspinal abnormalities are common in congenital scoliosis, yet estimates and associations with vertebral anomaly patterns and curve severity remain inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of intraspinal abnormalities in congenital scoliosis patients and evaluate relationships with sex, geographic region, vertebral anomaly type, and Cobb angle.Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched through January 1, 2026. Observational studies of congenital scoliosis patients who underwent MRI and reported intraspinal abnormalities were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using MINORS. (PROSPERO: CRD420251276010).Results

Eighteen studies reporting 4,463 patients were included; 1,474 had intraspinal abnormalities. Overall quality was moderate. Pooled prevalence was 35% (95% CI: 29%-40%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 91.1%) and a prediction interval of 16%-60%. Diastematomyelia was most frequent, followed by syringomyelia and tethered cord. Within each vertebral anomaly subgroup, pooled prevalence was 26% for failure of formation, 47% for failure of segmentation, and 40% for mixed defects. In unadjusted study-level comparisons, intraspinal abnormalities were associated with higher odds of failure of segmentation (odds ratio: 1.89 [95% CI: 1.39-2.56]) and mixed abnormalities (1.43 [1.09-1.88]). Cobb angle was higher in patients with intraspinal abnormalities than in those without, but the difference was not statistically significant (mean difference: 3.30° [95% CI: -1.53 to 8.13]; p = .1805).Conclusions

Intraspinal abnormalities affect one-third of congenital scoliosis patients. Failure of segmentation and mixed vertebral anomalies may identify higher-risk subgroups, supporting MRI-based evaluation for diagnosis and surgical planning.

Related

  1. Congenital Genitourinary Abnormalities Associated With Prenatal Drug Exposure
    Lisa B Shields, Kahir Jawad, Corey Moran +1
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCEurope PMC
  2. Prevalence of Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion Among Patients With Adrenal Incidentaloma and Its Association With Metabolic Abnormalities: A Hospital-Based, Analytical, Cross-Sectional Study
    Wardah Ikram
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Prevalence of neural tube defects and major external structural abnormalities by antiretroviral treatment regimen in Botswana in 2014–22: a birth outcomes surveillance study
    Rebecca Zash, Modiegi Diseko, Lewis B Holmes +11
    The Lancet Global HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Evaluation of Perinatal Prevalence, Geographic Disparities, and Survival of Neural Tube Defects — China, 2006–2024
    Wenli Xu, Wenyan Li, Jufen Liu +7
    China CDC weeklyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Association between hypertension prevalence and neighborhood characteristics in Japan using combined claims data and geographic information systems: a neighborhood correlation study from LIFE Study
    Kan Oishi, Rei Ono, Kojiro Ishii +5
    Environmental Health and Preventive MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{algarni2026intraspinal,
  title = {{Intraspinal abnormalities in MRI-evaluated congenital scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, geographic variation, vertebral anomaly patterns, and Cobb angle.}},
  author = {Nizar Algarni and Khalid Alrasheed and Faisal Alkhunein and Mohammed Alorayyidh and Rahaf Alrasheed and Yousef Marwan},
  journal = {North American Spine Society journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100943},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921359},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Intraspinal abnormalities in MRI-evaluated congenital scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, geographic variation, vertebral anomaly patterns, and Cobb angle.
AU  - Nizar Algarni
AU  - Khalid Alrasheed
AU  - Faisal Alkhunein
AU  - Mohammed Alorayyidh
AU  - Rahaf Alrasheed
AU  - Yousef Marwan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/12
JO  - North American Spine Society journal
DO  - 10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100943
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921359
AB  - Background  Intraspinal abnormalities are common in congenital scoliosis, yet estimates and associations with vertebral anomaly patterns and curve severity remain inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of intraspinal abnormalities in congenital scoliosis patients and evaluate relationships with sex, geographic region, vertebral anomaly type, and Cobb angle.Methods  PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched through January 1, 2026. Observational studies of congenital scoliosis patients who underwent MRI and reported intraspinal abnormalities were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using MINORS. (PROSPERO: CRD420251276010).Results  Eighteen studies reporting 4,463 patients were included; 1,474 had intraspinal abnormalities. Overall quality was moderate. Pooled prevalence was 35% (95% CI: 29%-40%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 91.1%) and a prediction interval of 16%-60%. Diastematomyelia was most frequent, followed by syringomyelia and tethered cord. Within each vertebral anomaly subgroup, pooled prevalence was 26% for failure of formation, 47% for failure of segmentation, and 40% for mixed defects. In unadjusted study-level comparisons, intraspinal abnormalities were associated with higher odds of failure of segmentation (odds ratio: 1.89 [95% CI: 1.39-2.56]) and mixed abnormalities (1.43 [1.09-1.88]). Cobb angle was higher in patients with intraspinal abnormalities than in those without, but the difference was not statistically significant (mean difference: 3.30° [95% CI: -1.53 to 8.13]; p = .1805).Conclusions  Intraspinal abnormalities affect one-third of congenital scoliosis patients. Failure of segmentation and mixed vertebral anomalies may identify higher-risk subgroups, supporting MRI-based evaluation for diagnosis and surgical planning.
SN  - 2666-5484
ER  -