A mismatch in wildfire impact reduction and ecological restoration in western U.S. fuel treatments
- 1University of California, Los Angeles
Abstract
A century of fire suppression has made historically fire-adapted forests across the western U.S. denser and dominated by fire-intolerant trees, leading to severe fires. Fuel treatments aim to reduce wildfire impact and restore fire-adapted forests. Ecological theory suggests these objectives need not align: protecting the existing, fire-maladapted stand may prevent fire-tolerant seedling recruitment. Using Forest Inventory and Analysis data on 81,621 trees and 41,328 seedlings across 11 western U.S. states, we show that fuel treatments increase tree survival, but benefits are largest for fire-intolerant trees, fade within nine years, and come with no seedling composition shift towards fire-tolerant species. Concluding, fuel reduction reduces wildfire impacts but does not restore fire-adapted forests. Without changes in treatment design, long-term resilience will require repeated intervention.
Related
- Effects of Different Ecological Restoration Treatments on Plant Functional Group Characteristics and Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry in Alpine Semi-Humid Sandy Land
- Interactions Between Mycorrhizal Fungi and Mycorrhiza Helper Bacteria: Mechanisms, Ecological Functions, and Potential Applications in Sustainable Agriculture and Ecological Restoration
- Multitrait Screening and SSR Fingerprinting of Calligonum Section Medusa Individuals for Desert Ecological Restoration
- Integrating MaxEnt and MaxNet for climate-resilient habitat restoration: Predicting the ecological niche of Eucalyptus tereticornis in semi-arid landscapes
- From horticultural greening to urban ecological restoration: How to favour herbaceous biodiversity when de-sealing
BibTeX
@misc{metz2026mismatch,
title = {{A mismatch in wildfire impact reduction and ecological restoration in western U.S. fuel treatments}},
author = {T. Metz and J. N. Hendershot and C. Song},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.30.763129},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.763129v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - A mismatch in wildfire impact reduction and ecological restoration in western U.S. fuel treatments
AU - T. Metz
AU - J. N. Hendershot
AU - C. Song
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.30.763129
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.763129v1
AB - A century of fire suppression has made historically fire-adapted forests across the western U.S. denser and dominated by fire-intolerant trees, leading to severe fires. Fuel treatments aim to reduce wildfire impact and restore fire-adapted forests. Ecological theory suggests these objectives need not align: protecting the existing, fire-maladapted stand may prevent fire-tolerant seedling recruitment. Using Forest Inventory and Analysis data on 81,621 trees and 41,328 seedlings across 11 western U.S. states, we show that fuel treatments increase tree survival, but benefits are largest for fire-intolerant trees, fade within nine years, and come with no seedling composition shift towards fire-tolerant species. Concluding, fuel reduction reduces wildfire impacts but does not restore fire-adapted forests. Without changes in treatment design, long-term resilience will require repeated intervention.
ER -