Potential Biodiversity Footprint Reductions from Intended Shifts to Plant-Based Meals.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, Nijmegen6525AJ, The Netherlands.
- 2Unilever Foods Innovation Centre Wageningen, Bronland 14, Wageningen6708WH, The Netherlands.
- 3Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen6708WH, The Netherlands.
- 4Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Sciences, Unilever R&D, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, BedfordshireMK44 1LQ, U.K.
Abstract
Adopting plant-based diets can mitigate biodiversity loss by reducing the demand for land required for feed and livestock. Yet, most assessments rely on hypothetical dietary scenarios that potentially overestimate biodiversity gains. We conducted a large-scale consumer survey across three countries (NLD, GBR, and USA) and estimated the biodiversity footprints of current and intended future diets using the loss of mean species abundance (MSA-loss) and the loss of global species richness (RSR-loss) as indicators. Over half of the respondents expressed no intention to reduce meat or dairy consumption. Among those intending to replace meat with plant-based alternatives, biodiversity footprints based on MSA-loss associated with the consumption of meat and plant-based alternatives in main meals would decrease by up to 34% on average. When considering all respondents, the average reduction in MSA-loss from meat and meat alternatives in the three countries would be 13%. We found similar results for current and intended future consumption of dairy and their plant-based alternatives. RSR-loss showed the same patterns as MSA-loss, although dairy alternatives would contribute a large share of the total biodiversity footprint based on RSR-loss in the USA. Our findings show that intended dietary shifts may not match hypothetical dietary scenarios and that achieving sustainable dietary shifts to reduce biodiversity loss remains a considerable challenge.
Related
- Climate Warming Patterns Predict Potential Residency Shifts
- Potential exposure risk of global timber production, carbon stocking, and biodiversity to forest pests
- Comparing the Index of Biodiversity Potential (IBP) in managed and unmanaged temperate lowland forests
- Age Associated Shifts Toward Anaerobic Taxa and Amino Acid Degradation Potential in the Canine Oral Microbiome
- Biostimulant potential of Limnospira platensis biomass fermented with lactic acid bacteria in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): strain characterization, biochemical shifts, and growth promotion
BibTeX
@article{zheng2026potential,
title = {{Potential Biodiversity Footprint Reductions from Intended Shifts to Plant-Based Meals.}},
author = {Hanzhong Zheng and Koen J J Kuipers and Selwyn Hoeks and Mark A J Huijbregts and Nicole Neufingerl and Elizabeth H Zandstra and Sarah Sim},
journal = {Environmental science \& technology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1021/acs.est.6c02675},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42917020},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Potential Biodiversity Footprint Reductions from Intended Shifts to Plant-Based Meals.
AU - Hanzhong Zheng
AU - Koen J J Kuipers
AU - Selwyn Hoeks
AU - Mark A J Huijbregts
AU - Nicole Neufingerl
AU - Elizabeth H Zandstra
AU - Sarah Sim
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Environmental science & technology
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.6c02675
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42917020
AB - Adopting plant-based diets can mitigate biodiversity loss by reducing the demand for land required for feed and livestock. Yet, most assessments rely on hypothetical dietary scenarios that potentially overestimate biodiversity gains. We conducted a large-scale consumer survey across three countries (NLD, GBR, and USA) and estimated the biodiversity footprints of current and intended future diets using the loss of mean species abundance (MSA-loss) and the loss of global species richness (RSR-loss) as indicators. Over half of the respondents expressed no intention to reduce meat or dairy consumption. Among those intending to replace meat with plant-based alternatives, biodiversity footprints based on MSA-loss associated with the consumption of meat and plant-based alternatives in main meals would decrease by up to 34% on average. When considering all respondents, the average reduction in MSA-loss from meat and meat alternatives in the three countries would be 13%. We found similar results for current and intended future consumption of dairy and their plant-based alternatives. RSR-loss showed the same patterns as MSA-loss, although dairy alternatives would contribute a large share of the total biodiversity footprint based on RSR-loss in the USA. Our findings show that intended dietary shifts may not match hypothetical dietary scenarios and that achieving sustainable dietary shifts to reduce biodiversity loss remains a considerable challenge.
SN - 0013-936X
SN - 1520-5851
ER -