Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Cost Analysis of Vasopressin Use in Septic Shock and Predictive Performance of GOSSIS in ICU Mortality

  1. 1University of Pittsburgh

Abstract

Background: Vasopressin is a commonly used adjunctive therapy in the management of septic shock. While vasopressin may provide clinical benefits, at times its acquisition cost has risen to being substantially more expensive than other second-line vasopressors such as epinephrine, phenylephrine, or dopamine. Additionally, mortality prediction tools such as the Global Open-Source Severity of Illness Score (GOSSIS) have emerged as a valuable resource to guide resource allocation in critical care. This study aimed to evaluate the healthcare costs associated with vasopressin use and assess the predictive performance of GOSSIS in patients with septic shock. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study of adult ICU patients with septic shock treated throughout the UPMC Health System from January 2021 to January 2022. Patients who received norepinephrine as a first-line vasopressor followed by either vasopressin or an alternative vasopressor were included. Generalized linear models with a log link and gamma distribution were used to compare adjusted total healthcare costs. Recycled predictions were used to estimate marginal cost differences. GOSSIS performance was evaluated by comparing predicted versus observed ICU mortality across risk groups. Results: Among 3,898 eligible patients, 1,060 received vasopressin and 2,838 received alternative second-line vasopressors. Vasopressin use was associated with significantly higher adjusted hospital costs (cost ratio = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.20). The estimated marginal cost difference was $5,887 per patient. Drug costs accounted for a greater proportion of total hospitalization costs among vasopressin users (20% vs. 12%). GOSSIS demonstrated strong calibration, with predicted ICU mortality closely aligning with observed rates across all severity strata. Conclusions: Vasopressin use in septic shock was associated with a 14% increase in hospitalization costs compared to alternative second-line vasopressors. The GOSSIS demonstrated strong predictive validity for ICU mortality, supporting its potential use in guiding resource allocation decisions in critically ill populations.

Related

  1. Association Between Vasopressor Discontinuation Sequence and Clinical Outcomes in Septic Shock: Norepinephrine Versus Vasopressin in the MIMIC-IV Database
    Lixian Jin, Yancong Wu, Hao Wang
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Effects of perfusion-guided permissive hypotension and early vasopressin initiation in adults with septic shock: protocol for a multicentre 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial in Japanese intensive care units
    Akira Endo, Kazuma Yamakawa, Takashi Tagami +27
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefPMC
  3. Factors Associated With Mortality Among Septic Hospital Ward Patients
    Matthew R. Dettmer, Shuaiqi Huang, Xiaofeng Wang +1
    Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Hepatic biomarker trajectories and mortality in septic adults with type 2 diabetes and recorded dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor exposure versus metformin-based therapy: A propensity-score-matched cohort study.
    Aristomenis G Alevizopoulos, Georgios G Anastasiou, Paraskevas Nomikos +1
    Metabolism openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  5. A laboratory-based selected logistic model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock.
    Liying Zhang, Pu Chen, Jie Li +2
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@misc{suh2026cost,
  title = {{Cost Analysis of Vasopressin Use in Septic Shock and Predictive Performance of GOSSIS in ICU Mortality}},
  author = {K. Suh and S. Wang and C. Donadee and A. Boeltz and I. J. Barbash and X. Guo and S. Alam and C. Horvat and V. Collier and R. Rivosecchi},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.03.26367179},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.03.26367179v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cost Analysis of Vasopressin Use in Septic Shock and Predictive Performance of GOSSIS in ICU Mortality
AU  - K. Suh
AU  - S. Wang
AU  - C. Donadee
AU  - A. Boeltz
AU  - I. J. Barbash
AU  - X. Guo
AU  - S. Alam
AU  - C. Horvat
AU  - V. Collier
AU  - R. Rivosecchi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.03.26367179
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.03.26367179v1
AB  - Background: Vasopressin is a commonly used adjunctive therapy in the management of septic shock. While vasopressin may provide clinical benefits, at times its acquisition cost has risen to being substantially more expensive than other second-line vasopressors such as epinephrine, phenylephrine, or dopamine. Additionally, mortality prediction tools such as the Global Open-Source Severity of Illness Score (GOSSIS) have emerged as a valuable resource to guide resource allocation in critical care. This study aimed to evaluate the healthcare costs associated with vasopressin use and assess the predictive performance of GOSSIS in patients with septic shock. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study of adult ICU patients with septic shock treated throughout the UPMC Health System from January 2021 to January 2022. Patients who received norepinephrine as a first-line vasopressor followed by either vasopressin or an alternative vasopressor were included. Generalized linear models with a log link and gamma distribution were used to compare adjusted total healthcare costs. Recycled predictions were used to estimate marginal cost differences. GOSSIS performance was evaluated by comparing predicted versus observed ICU mortality across risk groups. Results: Among 3,898 eligible patients, 1,060 received vasopressin and 2,838 received alternative second-line vasopressors. Vasopressin use was associated with significantly higher adjusted hospital costs (cost ratio = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.20). The estimated marginal cost difference was $5,887 per patient. Drug costs accounted for a greater proportion of total hospitalization costs among vasopressin users (20% vs. 12%). GOSSIS demonstrated strong calibration, with predicted ICU mortality closely aligning with observed rates across all severity strata. Conclusions: Vasopressin use in septic shock was associated with a 14% increase in hospitalization costs compared to alternative second-line vasopressors. The GOSSIS demonstrated strong predictive validity for ICU mortality, supporting its potential use in guiding resource allocation decisions in critically ill populations.
ER  -