Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFood science & nutrition

Nutrient-, Food-Group-, and Food-Item-Level Dietary Signatures of Psoriasis Comorbidity Among Adults With Anxiety Disorder: An Explainable Machine Learning Study.

  1. 1The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an China.
  2. 2Department of Anesthesiology (Xiamen Anesthesia Quality Control Center), The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine Xiamen University Xiamen China.

Abstract

Psoriasis and anxiety disorders frequently co-occur, yet the dietary features associated with this comorbidity remain poorly characterized. This cross-sectional study compared nutrient-, food-group-, and food-item-level dietary representations among adults with medication-defined anxiety disorder using linked National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), Food Patterns Equivalents Database/MyPyramid Equivalents Database (FPED/MPED), and What We Eat in America (WWEIA) data. Three analytic datasets were constructed at the nutrient level (n = 1016; 37 psoriasis-comorbidity cases), food-group level (n = 1215; 46 cases), and food-item level (n = 1257; 46 cases). Each dataset was divided using a fixed stratified 7:3 training-validation split. Correlation filtering, shadow-feature selection, scaling, class-imbalance handling, and hyperparameter tuning were confined to the training workflow, with five-fold stratified cross-validation and an untouched validation set. Seven models, including conventional multivariable logistic regression, were compared. In locked validation, the nutrient-level logistic regression model showed the strongest validation signal (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC-ROC] 0.645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.464-0.811; area under the precision-recall curve [AUC-PR] 0.063; Brier score 0.176). The food-group logistic regression model (AUC-ROC 0.396, 95% CI 0.256-0.539) and the food-item extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model (AUC-ROC 0.401, 95% CI 0.273-0.537) provided more limited validation signals in the present sample. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses of the cross-validation-selected models identified niacin, carbohydrate intake, β-cryptoxanthin, fat-related variables, hypertension, body mass index, and selected food categories as influential model features. These contributions are best interpreted as model-derived signals that prioritize candidate dietary and clinical features for further study. Together, the findings highlight nutrient-level dietary information as the most promising representation for subsequent development of nutrition-informed risk assessment in adults with anxiety. Larger prospective cohorts and external validation may further strengthen the clinical applicability of these signals.

Related

  1. Hospitalized patients lack pathogen-specific comorbidity signatures: general vulnerability and case fatality drive differences in mortality
    J. Bahnsen Schmidt, F. B. Hertz, S. Haussler
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: Comorbidity, Biomarkers, Circuits, and Treatment Strategies
    Xiao‐Yang Zhang, Zi‐Hao Li, Li‐Ping Shen +7
    MedCommPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  3. Does chronotype influence the odds of diabetes comorbidity in bipolar disorder? A cross-sectional analysis of the Our Future Health cohort.
    D. Swiffen, A. Mudra Rakshasa-Loots, C. Steyn +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  4. Psychiatric comorbidity in dissociative identity disorder: A meta-analysis
    E. Mitchell, A. Kazi, A. Watson +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  5. Anisometropia, Strabismus, and Amblyopia in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Their Comorbidity.
    Xiu Nian Chen, Yuzhou Zhang, Xiu Juan Zhang +11
    Ophthalmology sciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{gao2026nutrient,
  title = {{Nutrient-, Food-Group-, and Food-Item-Level Dietary Signatures of Psoriasis Comorbidity Among Adults With Anxiety Disorder: An Explainable Machine Learning Study.}},
  author = {Canni Gao and Xinxin Duan and Mei Luan and Weijie Huang and Guangdong Wang and Zhihong Xu},
  journal = {Food science \& nutrition},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/fsn3.72482},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909865},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Nutrient-, Food-Group-, and Food-Item-Level Dietary Signatures of Psoriasis Comorbidity Among Adults With Anxiety Disorder: An Explainable Machine Learning Study.
AU  - Canni Gao
AU  - Xinxin Duan
AU  - Mei Luan
AU  - Weijie Huang
AU  - Guangdong Wang
AU  - Zhihong Xu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Food science & nutrition
DO  - 10.1002/fsn3.72482
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909865
AB  - Psoriasis and anxiety disorders frequently co-occur, yet the dietary features associated with this comorbidity remain poorly characterized. This cross-sectional study compared nutrient-, food-group-, and food-item-level dietary representations among adults with medication-defined anxiety disorder using linked National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), Food Patterns Equivalents Database/MyPyramid Equivalents Database (FPED/MPED), and What We Eat in America (WWEIA) data. Three analytic datasets were constructed at the nutrient level (n = 1016; 37 psoriasis-comorbidity cases), food-group level (n = 1215; 46 cases), and food-item level (n = 1257; 46 cases). Each dataset was divided using a fixed stratified 7:3 training-validation split. Correlation filtering, shadow-feature selection, scaling, class-imbalance handling, and hyperparameter tuning were confined to the training workflow, with five-fold stratified cross-validation and an untouched validation set. Seven models, including conventional multivariable logistic regression, were compared. In locked validation, the nutrient-level logistic regression model showed the strongest validation signal (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC-ROC] 0.645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.464-0.811; area under the precision-recall curve [AUC-PR] 0.063; Brier score 0.176). The food-group logistic regression model (AUC-ROC 0.396, 95% CI 0.256-0.539) and the food-item extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model (AUC-ROC 0.401, 95% CI 0.273-0.537) provided more limited validation signals in the present sample. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses of the cross-validation-selected models identified niacin, carbohydrate intake, β-cryptoxanthin, fat-related variables, hypertension, body mass index, and selected food categories as influential model features. These contributions are best interpreted as model-derived signals that prioritize candidate dietary and clinical features for further study. Together, the findings highlight nutrient-level dietary information as the most promising representation for subsequent development of nutrition-informed risk assessment in adults with anxiety. Larger prospective cohorts and external validation may further strengthen the clinical applicability of these signals.
SN  - 2048-7177
ER  -