Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDClinical transplantation

Survival and Functional Status Outcomes in Heart Transplant Recipients: An Analysis of Organs From Donors Who Overdosed.

  1. 1M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.
  2. 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Arts & Sciences, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.

Abstract

Introduction

Escalating deaths associated with the opioid crisis has increased availability of transplant organs from donors who died of a drug overdose, yet perception of these organs as "increased risk" contributes to their unnecessary discard. Previous research addressing this issue has focused solely on survival outcomes, but quality of life is also a crucial factor in determining transplant success.Methods

In this study, a secondary analysis of data representing adult, first-time heart transplant recipients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between January 1, 2016, and March 1, 2020 was conducted. Logistic regression modeled one-year survival and functional status at one-year, and Cox proportional hazards modeled survival time post-transplant. Non-inferiority testing compared survival and functional status outcomes for overdose donor (n = 2240) and non-overdose donor (n = 9427) organ recipients.Results

When not controlling for significant covariates, one-year survival rates, post-transplant survival time, and one-year Karnofsky scores were at least as good or better for overdose donor organ recipients compared to non-overdose organ recipients based on a-priori non-inferiority thresholds; estimated OR for one-year survival is 1.0207 (95% CI [0.863, 1.213]), estimated hazards ratio is 0.9425 (95% CI [0.823, 1.079]), and estimated OR for having high one-year functional status is 0.9035 (95% CI [0.769, 1.066]). Controlling for significant covariates, one-year survival (OR 0.9613, 95% CI [0.790, 1.176]) and functional status (OR 1.0181, 95% CI [0.855, 1.218]) remained at least as good or better for overdose donor recipients; survival time was also estimated to be as good or better for overdose organ recipients when controlling for significant covariates (HR 0.9611, 95% CI [0.828, 1.115]), but not to the level of statistical significance based on the non-inferiority threshold.Conclusion

Overall, post-transplant survival times, one-year survival rates, and one-year functional status are similar for overdose and non-overdose organ heart transplant recipients. These findings support a broader utilization of the drug overdose donor pool, especially as the demand for heart transplantation increases.

Related

  1. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Bloodstream Infection in Hematologic Malignancies and Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Case-Control Study
    Open forum infectious diseasesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Long‐Term Proton Pump Inhibitors in Lung Transplant Recipients: Near‐Universal Use Without Clear Impact on Clinical Outcomes Over a 20‐Year Observational Study
    Chen Yang Kevin Zhang, Rayoun Ramendra, Meghan Aversa +7
    Clinical transplantationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Waitlist mortality and post transplant survival amongst non-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation high-urgency heart transplant recipients before and after the 2018 policy change.
    John P White, Joseph Song, Samuel T Kim +9
    JTCVS openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  4. Association of delayed graft function with cardiovascular outcomes in kidney transplant recipients
    Thomas Beaudrey, Estelle Aymes, Olivier Thaunat +19
    American Journal of TransplantationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND9 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaHAL
  5. Evaluating the 2023 safety-net kidney policy: Eligibility and outcomes of heart transplant recipients in the United States.
    Hedwig Zappacosta, Malini Daniel, Natalie Tan +4
    JTCVS openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{siebert2026survival,
  title = {{Survival and Functional Status Outcomes in Heart Transplant Recipients: An Analysis of Organs From Donors Who Overdosed.}},
  author = {Jennifer L Siebert and James D Mendez and Jennifer Yost and Paul W Bernhardt},
  journal = {Clinical transplantation},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1111/ctr.70725},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42912513},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Survival and Functional Status Outcomes in Heart Transplant Recipients: An Analysis of Organs From Donors Who Overdosed.
AU  - Jennifer L Siebert
AU  - James D Mendez
AU  - Jennifer Yost
AU  - Paul W Bernhardt
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Clinical transplantation
DO  - 10.1111/ctr.70725
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42912513
AB  - Introduction  Escalating deaths associated with the opioid crisis has increased availability of transplant organs from donors who died of a drug overdose, yet perception of these organs as "increased risk" contributes to their unnecessary discard. Previous research addressing this issue has focused solely on survival outcomes, but quality of life is also a crucial factor in determining transplant success.Methods  In this study, a secondary analysis of data representing adult, first-time heart transplant recipients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between January 1, 2016, and March 1, 2020 was conducted. Logistic regression modeled one-year survival and functional status at one-year, and Cox proportional hazards modeled survival time post-transplant. Non-inferiority testing compared survival and functional status outcomes for overdose donor (n = 2240) and non-overdose donor (n = 9427) organ recipients.Results  When not controlling for significant covariates, one-year survival rates, post-transplant survival time, and one-year Karnofsky scores were at least as good or better for overdose donor organ recipients compared to non-overdose organ recipients based on a-priori non-inferiority thresholds; estimated OR for one-year survival is 1.0207 (95% CI [0.863, 1.213]), estimated hazards ratio is 0.9425 (95% CI [0.823, 1.079]), and estimated OR for having high one-year functional status is 0.9035 (95% CI [0.769, 1.066]). Controlling for significant covariates, one-year survival (OR 0.9613, 95% CI [0.790, 1.176]) and functional status (OR 1.0181, 95% CI [0.855, 1.218]) remained at least as good or better for overdose donor recipients; survival time was also estimated to be as good or better for overdose organ recipients when controlling for significant covariates (HR 0.9611, 95% CI [0.828, 1.115]), but not to the level of statistical significance based on the non-inferiority threshold.Conclusion  Overall, post-transplant survival times, one-year survival rates, and one-year functional status are similar for overdose and non-overdose organ heart transplant recipients. These findings support a broader utilization of the drug overdose donor pool, especially as the demand for heart transplantation increases.
SN  - 0902-0063
SN  - 1399-0012
ER  -