Predictive coding unifies neural and behavioral signatures of contextual facilitation
Abstract
During comprehension, words that are primed or predictable are processed more quickly and elicit smaller N400 responses than words that are less consistent with their preceding context. Although these behavioral and neural effects are both commonly interpreted as evidence of facilitated processing, they have typically been explained within different computational frameworks that impose seemingly conflicting constraints: behavioral facilitation requires more activity to accumulate over expected representations, allowing a decision threshold to be reached earlier, whereas N400 facilitation requires less neural activity to be generated overall. Here, we show that an implemented model of predictive coding provides a unified mechanistic account of both phenomena and, in doing so, resolves three longstanding puzzles. First, it explains how facilitated processing can simultaneously produce faster behavioral responses and reduced neural activity: expected representations accumulate activity more rapidly in state units while generating less activity in error units. Second, an asymmetry between top-down priors and bottom-up evidence allows context to pre-activate multiple lexical candidates without inducing premature competition or misprediction costs. Third, it reconciles apparently conflicting claims about the timing of contextual facilitation by showing that behavioral and neural measures can reflect different phases along a single continuous trajectory of lexico-semantic processing, rather than distinct processing stages.
Related
- Facilitation and Attenuation of Learning to Novel and Familiar Stimuli Through Contextual Mismatch: Experimental Evidence and a Computational Model
- Behavioral signatures suggest distinct modes of suppressing irrelevant information during tactile temporal attention in human participants
- Computer vision-aided locomotor behavioral analysis identifies therapeutic motor signatures in a mouse model of Huntington disease
- Longitudinal associations between screen time activities and working memory neural signatures in adolescents: Sex differences and contextual moderation.
- Intrinsic connectivity signatures of anxiety sensitivity from connectome based predictive modeling
BibTeX
@misc{eddine2026predictive,
title = {{Predictive coding unifies neural and behavioral signatures of contextual facilitation}},
author = {Samer A. Nour Eddine and Anthony Yacovone and Gina R. Kuperberg},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/auvtf_v2},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/auvtf_v2/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Predictive coding unifies neural and behavioral signatures of contextual facilitation
AU - Samer A. Nour Eddine
AU - Anthony Yacovone
AU - Gina R. Kuperberg
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/12
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/auvtf_v2
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/auvtf_v2/
AB - During comprehension, words that are primed or predictable are processed more quickly and elicit smaller N400 responses than words that are less consistent with their preceding context. Although these behavioral and neural effects are both commonly interpreted as evidence of facilitated processing, they have typically been explained within different computational frameworks that impose seemingly conflicting constraints: behavioral facilitation requires more activity to accumulate over expected representations, allowing a decision threshold to be reached earlier, whereas N400 facilitation requires less neural activity to be generated overall. Here, we show that an implemented model of predictive coding provides a unified mechanistic account of both phenomena and, in doing so, resolves three longstanding puzzles. First, it explains how facilitated processing can simultaneously produce faster behavioral responses and reduced neural activity: expected representations accumulate activity more rapidly in state units while generating less activity in error units. Second, an asymmetry between top-down priors and bottom-up evidence allows context to pre-activate multiple lexical candidates without inducing premature competition or misprediction costs. Third, it reconciles apparently conflicting claims about the timing of contextual facilitation by showing that behavioral and neural measures can reflect different phases along a single continuous trajectory of lexico-semantic processing, rather than distinct processing stages.
ER -