Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Finite-source magnification residuals from a cNFW-inspired perturbation of an effective spinning black hole binary lens

Abstract

We ask whether a cored-NFW-inspired radial perturbation leaves a finite-source magnification residual after refitting the best effective spinning vacuum binary. We compute the source flux by direct image-plane integration and vary the lens scale, separation, mass ratio, two spin magnitudes, two projected spin directions, and one phase shift. After refitting, the caustics and magnification curves are almost identical and the phase shift is nearly zero. Still, a structured residual remains. At the highest resolution, the full-orbit rms residual is 1.61×10−2 and the maximum local residual is 4.41×10−2. Increasing the grid from 800×522 to 1000×653 changes the full-orbit rms by only 3.39×10−5. The residual also survives nine tests with Gaussian, uniform, and tapered sources at three RMS-size factors. Thus, a finite-source residual survives strong geometric degeneracy in this effective model. We do not claim a unique dark-matter detection or a prediction for a physically scaled binary.

Versions

Related

  1. Optimal galaxy magnification: generalized fundamental-plane residuals and number counts are all you need
    Kun Xu, Ravi K. Sheth
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  2. Weak lensing, Big Magnification: Recovering hidden lensing information from galaxy positions
    Alex Alarcon, Carles Sánchez
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyarXiv
  3. Binary-lens amplification of starlight: from magnification flares to quasi-periodic tracking of orbital evolution
    Hanxi Wang, Bence Kocsis, Miguel Zumalacárregui
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  4. Why Azimuthal Averaging Works in Halo Lensing: Symmetry and Power Counting for Nonlinear Shear and Magnification
    Keiichi Umetsu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  5. Two Low-Mass-Ratio Microlensing Planets from High-Magnification Events: KMT-2021-BLG-0247 and MOA-2023-BLG-169
    Kansuke Nunota, Andrew Gould, Takahiro Sumi +56
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesPlanetary science & exoplanetsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{fathi2026finitesource,
  title = {{Finite-source magnification residuals from a cNFW-inspired perturbation of an effective spinning black hole binary lens}},
  author = {Mohsen Fathi},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.23300},
  eprint = {2607.23300},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23300},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Finite-source magnification residuals from a cNFW-inspired perturbation of an effective spinning black hole binary lens
AU  - Mohsen Fathi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.23300
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23300
AB  - We ask whether a cored-NFW-inspired radial perturbation leaves a finite-source magnification residual after refitting the best effective spinning vacuum binary. We compute the source flux by direct image-plane integration and vary the lens scale, separation, mass ratio, two spin magnitudes, two projected spin directions, and one phase shift. After refitting, the caustics and magnification curves are almost identical and the phase shift is nearly zero. Still, a structured residual remains. At the highest resolution, the full-orbit rms residual is 1.61×10^−2 and the maximum local residual is 4.41×10^−2. Increasing the grid from 800×522 to 1000×653 changes the full-orbit rms by only 3.39×10^−5. The residual also survives nine tests with Gaussian, uniform, and tapered sources at three RMS-size factors. Thus, a finite-source residual survives strong geometric degeneracy in this effective model. We do not claim a unique dark-matter detection or a prediction for a physically scaled binary.
ER  -