Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCmedRxiv

Efficacy of physiotherapy in reducing pain in subjects with temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review with network meta-analysis

  1. 1Azienda USL Toscana sud est

Abstract

ObjectiveTemporomandibular disorders are common conditions in the general population. Several therapeutic approaches are available, but there is no consensus on the most effective, particularly in physiotherapy. The objective of this review is to assess the effect of manual therapy and therapeutic exercise in reducing pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders.

Data sourcesFour databases (MEDLINE, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL) were searched up to March 2025.

Review methodsWe included randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of manual therapy and/or therapeutic exercise in individuals with temporomandibular disorders, compared to any other rehabilitation treatment, with pain intensity as the primary outcome. The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare the effect of different rehabilitative approaches.

Results25 randomised clinical trials for a total of 1,540 people were included. The main comparisons were: manual therapy and/or therapeutic exercise vs no treatment or placebo, occlusal splint, and instrumental physiotherapy. In most studies, manual therapy and therapeutic exercise were more effective than controls in reducing pain. However, the network meta-analysis indicated that multimodal treatments were the most effective. The methodological quality of the included studies ranged from 3 to 9 points.

Conclusionmanual therapy and therapeutic exercise are effective strategies for reducing pain in subjects with temporomandibular disorders and should be used as first-line interventions before more invasive treatments; the combination of dry needling and manual therapy appears to be the most effective approach. Nonetheless, the variability in study quality suggests that further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings.

Related

  1. Comparative efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus low-level laser therapy for myogenous temporomandibular disorders: a randomised controlled trial protocol
    Yangjun Dong, Yang Yang, Zhongyi Fang +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Conservative and Minimally Invasive Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders Versus Inactive Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Oana Țănculescu, Eugenia-Larisa Țarevici, Petronela Bodnar +12
    Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Efficacy of combined therapies on degenerative joint disease of the temporomandibular joint: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rodrigo Sousa Uva, Eduardo Januzzi, Miguel De Pedro +1
    Osteoarthritis and cartilage openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Extracellular Matrix Remodeling and Glycoprotein Biomarkers Across Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Integrative Analysis
    Galina Laputková, Ivan Talian, Ján Sabo
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Comparing the safety and efficacy of low-dose versus high-dose tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in neurosurgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gutaybah S Alqarni, Maryam Alamer, Khloud Ahmad Ywsef +8
    Surgical neurology internationalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@misc{alvisi2026efficacy,
  title = {{Efficacy of physiotherapy in reducing pain in subjects with temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review with network meta-analysis}},
  author = {A. Alvisi and A. Casalini and L. Mammana and A. Ugolini},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.11.26365246},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.11.26365246v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Efficacy of physiotherapy in reducing pain in subjects with temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review with network meta-analysis
AU  - A. Alvisi
AU  - A. Casalini
AU  - L. Mammana
AU  - A. Ugolini
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/11
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.11.26365246
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.11.26365246v1
AB  - ObjectiveTemporomandibular disorders are common conditions in the general population. Several therapeutic approaches are available, but there is no consensus on the most effective, particularly in physiotherapy. The objective of this review is to assess the effect of manual therapy and therapeutic exercise in reducing pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders.  Data sourcesFour databases (MEDLINE, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL) were searched up to March 2025.  Review methodsWe included randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of manual therapy and/or therapeutic exercise in individuals with temporomandibular disorders, compared to any other rehabilitation treatment, with pain intensity as the primary outcome. The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare the effect of different rehabilitative approaches.  Results25 randomised clinical trials for a total of 1,540 people were included. The main comparisons were: manual therapy and/or therapeutic exercise vs no treatment or placebo, occlusal splint, and instrumental physiotherapy. In most studies, manual therapy and therapeutic exercise were more effective than controls in reducing pain. However, the network meta-analysis indicated that multimodal treatments were the most effective. The methodological quality of the included studies ranged from 3 to 9 points.  Conclusionmanual therapy and therapeutic exercise are effective strategies for reducing pain in subjects with temporomandibular disorders and should be used as first-line interventions before more invasive treatments; the combination of dry needling and manual therapy appears to be the most effective approach. Nonetheless, the variability in study quality suggests that further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings.
ER  -