Changes in ware–decoration associations in ceramic assemblages from Wacheqsa, Chavín de Huántar, Peru
- 1Dirección de Investigación e Innovación, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Peru.
Abstract
Ceramic differentiation can involve altered associations among continuing attributes without wholesale categorical replacement. At Wacheqsa, Chavín de Huántar, Peru, this study compares ware composition, decorative techniques, and their associations in 1,308 decorated or surface-treated sherd observations from five archaeological contexts. Early Platforms and Water Flood constitute the earlier Urabarroid aggregate; Stone Rooms, Midden, and Late Platforms constitute the later Janabarroid aggregate. These labels describe ceramic affinities within pre-existing context sets, whose stratigraphic networks are only partly connected and whose formation histories differ. On identical common support of nine wares and six techniques (n = 334/822), ware-margin Hellinger distance is 0.430 (95% fixed-count interval 0.392–0.481), technique-margin distance is 0.588 (0.551–0.634), and joint distance is 0.734 (0.714–0.793). A homogeneous-association model rejects a common ware–technique association after aggregate-specific margins are fitted (G2 = 118.59; pboot = 0.0001); the result persists without Midden (G2 = 90.16; pboot = 0.0001). Early Platforms differs from each later context, and stamping/impression is prominent in all three later samples, although those contexts retain distinct joint profiles. Nine of eleven ware categories occur in both aggregates, with pronounced differences in the association of polished wares with incision and stamping/impression. The contrast is consistent with differing decorated repertoires across activity and depositional settings, including contexts associated with collective consumption. Local superpositions and the published chronology support a temporal interpretation, but the contribution of elapsed time cannot be separated from differences in activity and deposition.
Related
- Bio-inspired decoration of Ag nanoparticles on eggshell-derived hierarchical CaO-based flower-like architectures for enhanced antibacterial, photocatalytic, and hemocompatible applications
- Controlled Decoration of Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene with Gold Nanoparticles for Electrocatalysis and Sensing
- Enhanced nonlinear optical properties of Triaza nanostructure through alkali metals decoration: A DFT Study
- Linking environmental variability to diatom assemblages in seasonal wetlands
- Ozone–water contacting by ceramic membranes
BibTeX
@article{mesiamontenegro2026changes,
title = {{Changes in ware–decoration associations in ceramic assemblages from Wacheqsa, Chavín de Huántar, Peru}},
author = {Christian Mesía-Montenegro},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0361889},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361889},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Changes in ware–decoration associations in ceramic assemblages from Wacheqsa, Chavín de Huántar, Peru
AU - Christian Mesía-Montenegro
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/29
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0361889
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361889
AB - Ceramic differentiation can involve altered associations among continuing attributes without wholesale categorical replacement. At Wacheqsa, Chavín de Huántar, Peru, this study compares ware composition, decorative techniques, and their associations in 1,308 decorated or surface-treated sherd observations from five archaeological contexts. Early Platforms and Water Flood constitute the earlier Urabarroid aggregate; Stone Rooms, Midden, and Late Platforms constitute the later Janabarroid aggregate. These labels describe ceramic affinities within pre-existing context sets, whose stratigraphic networks are only partly connected and whose formation histories differ. On identical common support of nine wares and six techniques (n = 334/822), ware-margin Hellinger distance is 0.430 (95% fixed-count interval 0.392–0.481), technique-margin distance is 0.588 (0.551–0.634), and joint distance is 0.734 (0.714–0.793). A homogeneous-association model rejects a common ware–technique association after aggregate-specific margins are fitted (G2 = 118.59; pboot = 0.0001); the result persists without Midden (G2 = 90.16; pboot = 0.0001). Early Platforms differs from each later context, and stamping/impression is prominent in all three later samples, although those contexts retain distinct joint profiles. Nine of eleven ware categories occur in both aggregates, with pronounced differences in the association of polished wares with incision and stamping/impression. The contrast is consistent with differing decorated repertoires across activity and depositional settings, including contexts associated with collective consumption. Local superpositions and the published chronology support a temporal interpretation, but the contribution of elapsed time cannot be separated from differences in activity and deposition.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -