Does female personality drive mate preference and reproduction in wild house mice?
Abstract
Personality, consistent individual behavioural variation, shapes how individuals move and engage with their socioecological environment, potentially influencing how they assess and choose mates. This makes personality a potential target of sexual selection. Indeed, personality is linked to partner choice, pair formation and mating outcomes in both human and non-human animals. However, it remains unclear whether personality shapes mating outcomes through active mate choice, or indirectly, by shaping which individuals encounter one another. Distinguishing between these pathways requires tracking mate choice across its successive stages, from preference and selectivity to realised reproduction. Here, we studied wild house mice in controlled mate preference assays and observed their matings in large semi-natural populations, allowing us to disentangle the stages of mate choice and test whether patterns from controlled conditions hold under naturalistic ones. Personality predicted female selectivity only in the controlled assay and produced assortative mating only in semi-natural conditions. Personality thus shapes different stages of mating depending on socioecological context, with assortative mating arising from personality-dependent space use rather than active preference. More broadly, personality may shape not mate preference itself but the processes generating it, so assessing its role in sexual selection requires tracking the full pathway from preference to reproduction.
Related
- Assessing a natural gene drive for population control in house mice
- House fly proto-Y chromosomes differentially affect courtship success regardless of social context and female type
- Eosinophils drive intestinal remodelling and innate defence in reproduction
- House Dust Mite Induces Distinct Cellular and Extracellular Vesicle-Associated miRNA Signatures in BEAS-2B Cells: Targeted Analysis of IL-4 Responses
- Differential Gene Expression in the Tropical House Cricket and Its Iridovirus in Healthy versus Diseased Specimens
BibTeX
@misc{darmis2026does,
title = {{Does female personality drive mate preference and reproduction in wild house mice?}},
author = {Fragkiskos Darmis and Anja Guenther and Alexandros Vezyrakis},
howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.32942/x2k97n},
url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15394/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Does female personality drive mate preference and reproduction in wild house mice?
AU - Fragkiskos Darmis
AU - Anja Guenther
AU - Alexandros Vezyrakis
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
PB - EcoEvoRxiv
DO - 10.32942/x2k97n
UR - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15394/
AB - Personality, consistent individual behavioural variation, shapes how individuals move and engage with their socioecological environment, potentially influencing how they assess and choose mates. This makes personality a potential target of sexual selection. Indeed, personality is linked to partner choice, pair formation and mating outcomes in both human and non-human animals. However, it remains unclear whether personality shapes mating outcomes through active mate choice, or indirectly, by shaping which individuals encounter one another. Distinguishing between these pathways requires tracking mate choice across its successive stages, from preference and selectivity to realised reproduction. Here, we studied wild house mice in controlled mate preference assays and observed their matings in large semi-natural populations, allowing us to disentangle the stages of mate choice and test whether patterns from controlled conditions hold under naturalistic ones. Personality predicted female selectivity only in the controlled assay and produced assortative mating only in semi-natural conditions. Personality thus shapes different stages of mating depending on socioecological context, with assortative mating arising from personality-dependent space use rather than active preference. More broadly, personality may shape not mate preference itself but the processes generating it, so assessing its role in sexual selection requires tracking the full pathway from preference to reproduction.
ER -