Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Identification of invariant determinants to improve care pathways: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals

Abstract

IntroductionCare pathways support the coordination and delivery of care, but their optimization requires a better understanding of the factors that influence their organization and evolution. This study aimed to define determinants of care pathways (DCPs) and identify invariant determinants of care pathways (IDCPs).MethodsA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 21 French healthcare professionals, including clinicians, academics, and institutional stakeholders. Data were analyzed thematically in accordance with COREQ guidelines.ResultsTwo main themes were identified. The first concerned the characteristics of DCPs and comprised three subthemes: their distinction from health determinants (HDs), the relevance of identifying DCPs, and their contribution to care-pathway modeling. Participants characterized HDs as factors influencing individual or population health status, whereas DCPs were described as factors primarily shaping the organization, accessibility, continuity and progression of care. Both may vary and interact over time. The second theme concerned the identification of IDCPs and comprised four categories: health status, systemic and organizational determinants, social and environmental determinants, and individual and psychological determinants. These categories were considered to be systematically present across care pathways, although their specific manifestations and effects varied according to the patient, context and stage of care.ConclusionsIDCPs provide a common analytical framework for analyzing and optimizing CPs. Systematically considering these categories, together with HDs and specific DCPs, may help identify modifiable points of disruption and support the design, evaluation and modeling of more coordinated and patient-centered care.

Related

  1. How healthcare professionals manage uncertainty around hormone replacement therapy (dis-)continuation: the TAPER qualitative Study
    S. Hillman, L. Jones, N. Kuypers +1
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
  2. Accessibility of essential medicines and vaccines among fisherfolk, artisanal miners and pastoralists in Mainland Tanzania: a qualitative study of barriers and strategies from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and community leaders.
    Lawrencia D Mushi, Noel O Otieno
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  3. What is an ideal mHealth for post-discharge home care of CHD: perspectives from primary caregivers, healthcare professionals, and project technical consultants: a qualitative research study
    Ruijie YangLan, Fang Ma, Qinglan Li +2
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. Qualitative Assessment of Access to Community Mental Health Centers from the Perspectives of Patients, Patient Relatives, and Healthcare Professionals
    Sultan Kökcealan, Yeşim Maçça Polat, Ayşe Okanlı +3
    Psikiyatride Güncel YaklaşımlarPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthDOAJ
  5. Identifying the needs and optimal support for healthcare professionals after in-hospital cardiac arrest: a qualitative study
    Sacha L. K. Roest, Kristian Krogh, Bo Løfgren +1
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@article{vigneulles2026identification,
  title = {{Identification of invariant determinants to improve care pathways: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals}},
  author = {Benjamin du Sartz de Vigneulles and Romain Lan and Florence Carrouel and Bérénice Perroud and Gérard Mick and Claude Dussart},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1978824},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1978824},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Identification of invariant determinants to improve care pathways: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals
AU  - Benjamin du Sartz de Vigneulles
AU  - Romain Lan
AU  - Florence Carrouel
AU  - Bérénice Perroud
AU  - Gérard Mick
AU  - Claude Dussart
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1978824
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1978824
AB  - IntroductionCare pathways support the coordination and delivery of care, but their optimization requires a better understanding of the factors that influence their organization and evolution. This study aimed to define determinants of care pathways (DCPs) and identify invariant determinants of care pathways (IDCPs).MethodsA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 21 French healthcare professionals, including clinicians, academics, and institutional stakeholders. Data were analyzed thematically in accordance with COREQ guidelines.ResultsTwo main themes were identified. The first concerned the characteristics of DCPs and comprised three subthemes: their distinction from health determinants (HDs), the relevance of identifying DCPs, and their contribution to care-pathway modeling. Participants characterized HDs as factors influencing individual or population health status, whereas DCPs were described as factors primarily shaping the organization, accessibility, continuity and progression of care. Both may vary and interact over time. The second theme concerned the identification of IDCPs and comprised four categories: health status, systemic and organizational determinants, social and environmental determinants, and individual and psychological determinants. These categories were considered to be systematically present across care pathways, although their specific manifestations and effects varied according to the patient, context and stage of care.ConclusionsIDCPs provide a common analytical framework for analyzing and optimizing CPs. Systematically considering these categories, together with HDs and specific DCPs, may help identify modifiable points of disruption and support the design, evaluation and modeling of more coordinated and patient-centered care.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -