Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Nursing Open

Changes in Nursing Students' Clinical Handover Performance Following ISBAR‐Structured Handover Simulation Teaching: A Mixed‐Methods Study

  1. 1Department of Nursing Chang Gung University of Science and Technology Taoyuan Taiwan
  2. 2Department of Nursing New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital (Built and Operated by Chang Gung Medical Foundation) New Taipei Taiwan

Abstract

Background: Clinical handover is critical for patient safety, yet nursing students frequently lack structured training, making it difficult to convey essential information accurately.

Aim: To examine changes in students' communication clarity, confidence and learning experiences following ISBAR (Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) simulation‐based teaching.

Methods: A mixed‐methods design with 57 nursing students combined a single‐group pretest–posttest study and focus group interviews. Data were collected from questionnaires and OSCE (Objective structured clinical examination), and analysed using SPSS 28.0 and content analysis.

Results: Following the ISBAR‐structured handover simulation intervention, post‐intervention scores for communication clarity and confidence were significantly higher than pre‐intervention scores. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: (1) mastering the handover framework to enhance organized expression; (2) scenario simulation strengthening clinical reasoning and adaptability; (3) peer feedback and reflection promoting self‐awareness; and (4) progressive practice building handover confidence.

Conclusions: Communication clarity and confidence improved after ISBAR simulation‐based teaching. Because the design was single‐group and uncontrolled, these changes cannot be attributed exclusively to the intervention; controlled studies are needed.

Implications for Nursing: Incorporating this model into specialist nursing curricula—particularly in high‐risk areas such as obstetrics—through scenario‐based practice is recommended to strengthen communication quality; effects on patient‐safety outcomes were not assessed and warrant future evaluation.

Reporting Method: This study adhered to EQUATOR guidelines and used COREQ for qualitative reporting.

Patient Contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Related

  1. Association Between Structured Obstetric Simulation and OSCE Performance in Undergraduate Medical Students
    Rosa Patricia Cruz-Nieves, Angela Leticia Zambrano-Gutiérrez, Paulina Guadalupe Briseño-Sahagun +3
    Medical Science EducatorPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPhysiologyPMC
  2. Unlocking the power of reflection: how simulation debriefing shapes clinical decision-making and competence in nursing students
    Shaimaa Mohamed Amin, Sameer A. Alkubati, Haitham Mokhtar Mohamed Abdallah +7
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Cognitive biases in nursing students' clinical decision-making: insights from high-fidelity simulation using think-aloud and observational methods
    Naim Abdulmohdi
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. Integrating nutrition counseling into clinical skills training: a simulation-based interprofessional education program for medical and nursing students
    Linjian Huang, Simin Deng, Hanwen Chu +1
    BMC Medical EducationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Analysis of the impact of naturally-acquired immunity on Shigella vaccine performance to inform clinical trials: A simulation-based modeling study
    Avnika B. Amin, Maria Garcia Quesada, Daniel Trudell +4
    PLOS MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyMicrobiologyPLOSDOAJPMC
BibTeX
@article{sun2026changes,
  title = {{Changes in Nursing Students' Clinical Handover Performance Following ISBAR‐Structured Handover Simulation Teaching: A Mixed‐Methods Study}},
  author = {Jui‐Chiung Sun and Min‐Yu Chang and Yi‐Chun Tsai},
  journal = {Nursing Open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/nop2.70955},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70955},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Changes in Nursing Students' Clinical Handover Performance Following ISBAR‐Structured Handover Simulation Teaching: A Mixed‐Methods Study
AU  - Jui‐Chiung Sun
AU  - Min‐Yu Chang
AU  - Yi‐Chun Tsai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Nursing Open
DO  - 10.1002/nop2.70955
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70955
AB  - Background: Clinical handover is critical for patient safety, yet nursing students frequently lack structured training, making it difficult to convey essential information accurately.  Aim: To examine changes in students' communication clarity, confidence and learning experiences following ISBAR (Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) simulation‐based teaching.  Methods: A mixed‐methods design with 57 nursing students combined a single‐group pretest–posttest study and focus group interviews. Data were collected from questionnaires and OSCE (Objective structured clinical examination), and analysed using SPSS 28.0 and content analysis.  Results: Following the ISBAR‐structured handover simulation intervention, post‐intervention scores for communication clarity and confidence were significantly higher than pre‐intervention scores. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: (1) mastering the handover framework to enhance organized expression; (2) scenario simulation strengthening clinical reasoning and adaptability; (3) peer feedback and reflection promoting self‐awareness; and (4) progressive practice building handover confidence.  Conclusions: Communication clarity and confidence improved after ISBAR simulation‐based teaching. Because the design was single‐group and uncontrolled, these changes cannot be attributed exclusively to the intervention; controlled studies are needed.  Implications for Nursing: Incorporating this model into specialist nursing curricula—particularly in high‐risk areas such as obstetrics—through scenario‐based practice is recommended to strengthen communication quality; effects on patient‐safety outcomes were not assessed and warrant future evaluation.  Reporting Method: This study adhered to EQUATOR guidelines and used COREQ for qualitative reporting.  Patient Contribution: No patient or public contribution.
SN  - 2054-1058
ER  -