Operative Versus Non-Operative Management for Pancreatic Trauma: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- 1Department of Trauma Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon 21565, Republic of Korea
- 2Department of Traumatology, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon 21565, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pancreatic trauma is uncommon but highly morbid, and management has shifted toward non-operative management (NOM) with endoscopic and percutaneous adjuncts. Existing systematic reviews report heterogeneous findings, and no umbrella review has been published. We therefore synthesized this evidence, comparing operative management (OM) with NOM. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through 3 September 2026, following PRISMA 2020 and PRIOR (PROSPERO CRD420261495303). Eligible studies were systematic reviews comparing OM with NOM in pancreatic trauma. Two reviewers independently performed selection, extraction, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS appraisal. Findings were synthesized narratively, separately for children and adults, with blunt injury as the primary comparison. Results: Six reviews were included (three pediatric, two adult, one mixed). In children, no review demonstrated a statistically significant difference in mortality (odds ratio [OR] for NOM vs. OM, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.42–2.22); NOM succeeded in 87% and was associated with more pseudocysts (OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.84–5.05; OR, 12.46 in grade III or higher injury), two-thirds managed without surgery, and with less fistula (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.82). Adult estimates were crude and highly imprecise (mortality risk ratio for OM vs. NOM, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.04–9.91). Pediatric reviews overlapped heavily (corrected covered area, 38.3%); all six had critically low confidence and high risk of bias. Conclusions: The evidence does not allow the two strategies to be judged equivalent in either population. It is confounded by indication and concentrated in overlapping pediatric cohorts; the key unanswered question concerns stable patients with blunt ductal injury, stratified by ductal location.
Related
- Risk factors for renal cell carcinoma: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Evidence quality assessment of traditional Chinese medicine and integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine for acute upper respiratory infection in children: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Non-operative management in patients with iatrogenic colorectal perforations: protocol for a systematic review
- Factors associated with mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Operative management of abdominal bulge following deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review of repair strategies and outcomes
BibTeX
@article{min2026operative,
title = {{Operative Versus Non-Operative Management for Pancreatic Trauma: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses}},
author = {Soon Ki Min and Mina Lee and Youngmin Kim and Kang Kook Choi and Byungchul Yu and Gil Jae Lee and Wu Seong Kang},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15207865},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7865},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Operative Versus Non-Operative Management for Pancreatic Trauma: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
AU - Soon Ki Min
AU - Mina Lee
AU - Youngmin Kim
AU - Kang Kook Choi
AU - Byungchul Yu
AU - Gil Jae Lee
AU - Wu Seong Kang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15207865
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7865
AB - Background/Objectives: Pancreatic trauma is uncommon but highly morbid, and management has shifted toward non-operative management (NOM) with endoscopic and percutaneous adjuncts. Existing systematic reviews report heterogeneous findings, and no umbrella review has been published. We therefore synthesized this evidence, comparing operative management (OM) with NOM. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through 3 September 2026, following PRISMA 2020 and PRIOR (PROSPERO CRD420261495303). Eligible studies were systematic reviews comparing OM with NOM in pancreatic trauma. Two reviewers independently performed selection, extraction, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS appraisal. Findings were synthesized narratively, separately for children and adults, with blunt injury as the primary comparison. Results: Six reviews were included (three pediatric, two adult, one mixed). In children, no review demonstrated a statistically significant difference in mortality (odds ratio [OR] for NOM vs. OM, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.42–2.22); NOM succeeded in 87% and was associated with more pseudocysts (OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.84–5.05; OR, 12.46 in grade III or higher injury), two-thirds managed without surgery, and with less fistula (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.82). Adult estimates were crude and highly imprecise (mortality risk ratio for OM vs. NOM, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.04–9.91). Pediatric reviews overlapped heavily (corrected covered area, 38.3%); all six had critically low confidence and high risk of bias. Conclusions: The evidence does not allow the two strategies to be judged equivalent in either population. It is confounded by indication and concentrated in overlapping pediatric cohorts; the key unanswered question concerns stable patients with blunt ductal injury, stratified by ductal location.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -