Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYGlobal health action

Caesarean section use and inequalities in Bangladesh in regional context: comparisons with West Bengal and Nepal.

  1. 1Maternal and Child Health Division, International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  2. 2Rural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

Background

Caesarean section (CS) can be life-saving when medically indicated, but its rapid increase raises concerns about overuse and unequal access.Objective

To characterise CS prevalence, facility patterns, socioeconomic inequality, and associated factors in Bangladesh, and descriptively compare these patterns with Nepal and West Bengal, India.Methods

We analysed cross-sectional data from the 2022 Bangladesh and Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys and the West Bengal sample of India's National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-2021). Analyses included each woman's most recent live birth in the preceding 5 years. We estimated weighted prevalence, concentration indices, and adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using survey-weighted modified Poisson regression.Results

CS prevalence was highest in Bangladesh (44.6%), followed by West Bengal (34.8%) and Nepal (19.3%). Among facility births, the proportions delivered by CS were 69.3%, 37.4%, and 23.9%, respectively. Private for-profit facility delivery showed the strongest association with CS use in Bangladesh (APR 5.86; 95% CI 5.26-6.54), West Bengal (APR 3.02), and Nepal (APR 2.65). CS use was concentrated among wealthier women, with concentration indices of 0.20, 0.24, and 0.35, respectively. In Bangladesh, CS use was also associated with urban residence and more antenatal care visits; maternal age showed stronger associations in West Bengal and Nepal.Conclusions

Bangladesh had higher CS use than West Bengal and Nepal, alongside high private-facility CS rates and substantial wealth-related inequality. Policies should strengthen monitoring and clinical audit to identify and review potentially unnecessary CS while ensuring timely access to medically indicated CS for disadvantaged women.

Related

  1. Caesarean section in Bangladesh, 2012-13 to 2025: facility birth, the private sector and small-area geography
    F. S. Hossain, K. Nahar, F. Zuhora +5
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
  2. Decomposing the Caesarean section trend in Bangladesh (2012-2025): A multivariate Linear Probability Model analysis
    M. A. Limon
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  3. Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexamethasone as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine for Wound Infiltration After Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anaesthesia
    Shabnam Goyal, Pooja Gunwal, Deepak K Saini +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Second Stage Caesarean Section and Subsequent Preterm Birth
    Keyi Lau, Vanessa El-Achi, Jenny M Yang
    The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  5. Successful caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia in a pregnant woman with guillain-barré syndrome: a case report from a resource-limited setting.
    Shilpa A Naik, Prathvi B, Ranjan R K
    BMC anesthesiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{aktar2026caesarean,
  title = {{Caesarean section use and inequalities in Bangladesh in regional context: comparisons with West Bengal and Nepal.}},
  author = {Shaki Aktar and Monjur Rahman},
  journal = {Global health action},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1080/16549716.2026.2750044},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908384},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Caesarean section use and inequalities in Bangladesh in regional context: comparisons with West Bengal and Nepal.
AU  - Shaki Aktar
AU  - Monjur Rahman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Global health action
DO  - 10.1080/16549716.2026.2750044
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908384
AB  - Background  Caesarean section (CS) can be life-saving when medically indicated, but its rapid increase raises concerns about overuse and unequal access.Objective  To characterise CS prevalence, facility patterns, socioeconomic inequality, and associated factors in Bangladesh, and descriptively compare these patterns with Nepal and West Bengal, India.Methods  We analysed cross-sectional data from the 2022 Bangladesh and Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys and the West Bengal sample of India's National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-2021). Analyses included each woman's most recent live birth in the preceding 5 years. We estimated weighted prevalence, concentration indices, and adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using survey-weighted modified Poisson regression.Results  CS prevalence was highest in Bangladesh (44.6%), followed by West Bengal (34.8%) and Nepal (19.3%). Among facility births, the proportions delivered by CS were 69.3%, 37.4%, and 23.9%, respectively. Private for-profit facility delivery showed the strongest association with CS use in Bangladesh (APR 5.86; 95% CI 5.26-6.54), West Bengal (APR 3.02), and Nepal (APR 2.65). CS use was concentrated among wealthier women, with concentration indices of 0.20, 0.24, and 0.35, respectively. In Bangladesh, CS use was also associated with urban residence and more antenatal care visits; maternal age showed stronger associations in West Bengal and Nepal.Conclusions  Bangladesh had higher CS use than West Bengal and Nepal, alongside high private-facility CS rates and substantial wealth-related inequality. Policies should strengthen monitoring and clinical audit to identify and review potentially unnecessary CS while ensuring timely access to medically indicated CS for disadvantaged women.
SN  - 1654-9716
SN  - 1654-9880
ER  -