Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

A prospective, observational study to evaluate the efficacy of the retrograde intrarenal surgery scoring system for predicting stone-free rate following retrograde intrarenal surgery.

  1. 1Department of Urology, Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
  2. 2Department of Urology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Abstract

Introduction

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is widely performed for renal calculi; however, stone-free outcomes vary according to the stone burden and intrarenal anatomy. The RIRS scoring system was developed to objectively predict the stone-free rate (SFR) using preoperative computed tomography (CT) parameters. This study prospectively evaluated its predictive performance.Methods

In this prospective, observational study, 100 consecutive patients undergoing RIRS at a tertiary center (August 2023-March 2025) were included. Preoperative CT urography assessed stone number, cumulative diameter, density (hounsfield unit), location, renal infundibulo-pelvic angle (RIPA), renal infundibular length (RIL), and renal infundibular width (RIW). Each case received a RIRS score (4-10). Stone-free status (SFS) was assessed at 4 weeks; residual fragments >2 mm were considered failure to achieve SFS. Logistic regression identified the predictors of non-SFS and receiver operating characteristic analysis evaluated diagnostic performance.Results

The overall SFR was 78%. SFR declined with increasing score: 100% (4-5), 96% (6), 55.6% (7), 9% (8), and 0% (9-10) (P < 0.001). Larger stone burden, higher density, acute RIPA, longer RIL, narrower RIW, and higher RIRS score were significantly associated with failure to achieve SFS on the univariate analysis. The score demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve ≈ 0.76). At a cutoff of 5, sensitivity was 51.3%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, negative predictive value was 36.7%, and accuracy was 62%.Conclusions

The RIRS scoring system enables effective preoperative risk stratification, accurately identifying low-risk patients with a high likelihood of clearance and high-risk cases at risk of failure, thereby supporting surgical planning and patient counseling.

Related

  1. Safety and Recovery Profile of Propofol-Based Intravenous Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Adults: A Prospective Single-Center Observational Study
    Muhammad Ahmad Khan, Tariq Mahmood, Mirza Ahmad Raza Baig +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Comparison of the efficacy between modified prone split-leg position and lithotomy position in retrograde intrarenal surgery for upper urinary tract calculi
    Hongfei Li, Chao Li, Jiahang Liu +3
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  3. Combined antegrade and retrograde transarterial approaches for embolization of a traumatic carotid‑cavernous fistula with concomitant middle meningeal arteriovenous fistula
    Radiology case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Breaking the compatibility barrier: cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy during enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Roux-en-Y anatomy.
    Alda Andrade, Ana Rita Ribeiro, Jorge Bezerra +4
    EndoscopyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Cerebral Air Embolism Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Stent Removal: A Rare and Fatal Complication.
    Bavani Senthuran, A Arulmurali, Anuratha Kajendran +2
    Case reports in anesthesiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{mohanty2026prospective,
  title = {{A prospective, observational study to evaluate the efficacy of the retrograde intrarenal surgery scoring system for predicting stone-free rate following retrograde intrarenal surgery.}},
  author = {Subrat Mohanty and Karunya Katragadda and K Pradeep and Gurram Mallikarjuna},
  journal = {Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.4103/iju.iju_61_26},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42910132},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A prospective, observational study to evaluate the efficacy of the retrograde intrarenal surgery scoring system for predicting stone-free rate following retrograde intrarenal surgery.
AU  - Subrat Mohanty
AU  - Karunya Katragadda
AU  - K Pradeep
AU  - Gurram Mallikarjuna
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
JO  - Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
DO  - 10.4103/iju.iju_61_26
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42910132
AB  - Introduction  Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is widely performed for renal calculi; however, stone-free outcomes vary according to the stone burden and intrarenal anatomy. The RIRS scoring system was developed to objectively predict the stone-free rate (SFR) using preoperative computed tomography (CT) parameters. This study prospectively evaluated its predictive performance.Methods  In this prospective, observational study, 100 consecutive patients undergoing RIRS at a tertiary center (August 2023-March 2025) were included. Preoperative CT urography assessed stone number, cumulative diameter, density (hounsfield unit), location, renal infundibulo-pelvic angle (RIPA), renal infundibular length (RIL), and renal infundibular width (RIW). Each case received a RIRS score (4-10). Stone-free status (SFS) was assessed at 4 weeks; residual fragments >2 mm were considered failure to achieve SFS. Logistic regression identified the predictors of non-SFS and receiver operating characteristic analysis evaluated diagnostic performance.Results  The overall SFR was 78%. SFR declined with increasing score: 100% (4-5), 96% (6), 55.6% (7), 9% (8), and 0% (9-10) (P < 0.001). Larger stone burden, higher density, acute RIPA, longer RIL, narrower RIW, and higher RIRS score were significantly associated with failure to achieve SFS on the univariate analysis. The score demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve ≈ 0.76). At a cutoff of 5, sensitivity was 51.3%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, negative predictive value was 36.7%, and accuracy was 62%.Conclusions  The RIRS scoring system enables effective preoperative risk stratification, accurately identifying low-risk patients with a high likelihood of clearance and high-risk cases at risk of failure, thereby supporting surgical planning and patient counseling.
SN  - 0970-1591
SN  - 1998-3824
ER  -