Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Asymmetric Weighted Earliness-Tardiness: Scheduling with a Nonrestrictive Common Due Date

Abstract

Single-machine asymmetric weighted earliness--tardiness (AWET) scheduling asks how to sequence jobs around a common synchronization date when early and late completion incur unrelated job-dependent penalties. At the boundary nonrestrictive date d=∑jpj, a compact V-shaped schedule reduces the continuous-time problem to a quadratic choice of a nonempty early set. We establish four complementary results for this model. First, the positive-integer problem is strongly NP-complete by a unary-polynomial reduction from Restricted Exact Cover by 3-Sets. Second, unrestricted AWET admits a polynomial-time (3+2√2+ε)-approximation based on an anchored semidefinite relaxation and deterministic marginal thresholding. Third, when the earliness and tardiness ratio orders are strict reversals, the problem is weakly NP-complete but has an exact two-resource pseudopolynomial dynamic program. Fourth, for fixed total refinements whose ratio permutation is separable, an exact separating-tree recurrence and coordinated geometric trimming yield an FPTAS. The proofs use different manifestations of the same canonical objective: scale-separated prefix penalties, positive-semidefinite minimum-kernel covariance, a dominant completed load square, and a bounded four-coordinate decomposition interface. Together, the results show that the decisive issue is not merely whether the two ratio orders agree, but whether their interaction can be controlled by a global certificate or compressed into a bounded constructive interface.

Related

  1. Strong NP-Hardness and Approximation Algorithm for Weighted Tardiness with Release Dates and Identical Processing Times
    Zhi-Long Chen, Nicholas G. Hall
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Online Packet Scheduling with Deadlines and Learning
    Gianmarco Genalti, Achraf Azize, Vianney Perchet
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Optimal Uniform-like Scheduling of Maintenance
    Yakov Genis, Igor Ushakov
    Reliability: Theory & ApplicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  4. Dropout Universality: Scaling Laws and Optimal Scheduling at the Edge-of-Chaos
    Lucas Fernandez Sarmiento
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsCondensed matterarXiv
  5. DynaSPLIT: Strong tail-optimal scheduling for the M/G/n with heavy-tailed job sizes
    Zhouzi Li, Mor Harchol-Balter, Alan Scheller-Wolf
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{hall2026asymmetric,
  title = {{Asymmetric Weighted Earliness-Tardiness: Scheduling with a Nonrestrictive Common Due Date}},
  author = {Nicholas G. Hall and Hans Kellerer and Miao Song},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.16046},
  eprint = {2609.16046},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16046},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Asymmetric Weighted Earliness-Tardiness: Scheduling with a Nonrestrictive Common Due Date
AU  - Nicholas G. Hall
AU  - Hans Kellerer
AU  - Miao Song
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.16046
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16046
AB  - Single-machine asymmetric weighted earliness--tardiness (AWET) scheduling asks how to sequence jobs around a common synchronization date when early and late completion incur unrelated job-dependent penalties. At the boundary nonrestrictive date d=∑_jp_j, a compact V-shaped schedule reduces the continuous-time problem to a quadratic choice of a nonempty early set. We establish four complementary results for this model. First, the positive-integer problem is strongly NP-complete by a unary-polynomial reduction from Restricted Exact Cover by 3-Sets. Second, unrestricted AWET admits a polynomial-time (3+2√2+ε)-approximation based on an anchored semidefinite relaxation and deterministic marginal thresholding. Third, when the earliness and tardiness ratio orders are strict reversals, the problem is weakly NP-complete but has an exact two-resource pseudopolynomial dynamic program. Fourth, for fixed total refinements whose ratio permutation is separable, an exact separating-tree recurrence and coordinated geometric trimming yield an FPTAS. The proofs use different manifestations of the same canonical objective: scale-separated prefix penalties, positive-semidefinite minimum-kernel covariance, a dominant completed load square, and a bounded four-coordinate decomposition interface. Together, the results show that the decisive issue is not merely whether the two ratio orders agree, but whether their interaction can be controlled by a global certificate or compressed into a bounded constructive interface.
ER  -